A structural comparison of the colicin immunity proteins Im7 and Im9 gives new insights into the molecular determinants of immunity-protein specificity

被引:73
作者
Dennis, CA
Videler, H
Pauptit, RA
Wallis, R
James, R
Moore, GR
Kleanthous, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Anglia, Sch Biol Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[2] Zeneca Pharmaceut, Prot Struct Lab, Macclesfield SK10 4TG, Cheshire, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Dept Biochem, Oxford OX1 3QU, England
[4] Univ E Anglia, Sch Chem Sci, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
关键词
D O I
10.1042/bj3330183
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We report the first detailed comparison of two immunity proteins which, in conjunction with recent protein engineering data, begins to explain how these structurally similar proteins are able to bind and inhibit the endonuclease domain of colicin E9 (E9 DNase) with affinities that differ by 12 orders of magnitude. In the present work, we have determined the X-ray structure of the Escherichia coli colicin E7 immunity protein Im7 to 2.0 Angstrom resolution by molecular replacement, using as a trial model the recently determined NMR solution structure of Im9. Whereas the two proteins adopt similar four-helix structures, subtle structural differences, in particular involving a conserved tyrosine residue critical for E9 DNase binding, and the identity of key residues in the specificity helix, lie at the heart of their markedly different ability to bind the E9 DNase. Two other crystal structures were reported recently for Im7; in one, Im7 was a monomer and was very similar to the structure reported here, whereas in the other it was a dimer to which functional significance was assigned. Since this previous work suggested that Im7 could exist either as a monomer or a dimer, we used analytical ultracentrifugation to investigate this question further. Under a variety of solution conditions, we found that Im7 only ever exists in solution as a monomer, even up to protein concentrations of 15 mg/ml, casting doubt on the functional significance of the crystallographically observed dimer. This work provides a structural framework with which we can understand immunity-protein specificity, and in addition we believe it to be the first successfully refined crystal structure solved by molecular replacement using an NMR trial model with less than 100% sequence identity.
引用
收藏
页码:183 / 191
页数:9
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   THE CCP4 SUITE - PROGRAMS FOR PROTEIN CRYSTALLOGRAPHY [J].
BAILEY, S .
ACTA CRYSTALLOGRAPHICA SECTION D-BIOLOGICAL CRYSTALLOGRAPHY, 1994, 50 :760-763
[2]   CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE OF INTERLEUKIN-8 - SYMBIOSIS OF NMR AND CRYSTALLOGRAPHY [J].
BALDWIN, ET ;
WEBER, IT ;
STCHARLES, R ;
XUAN, JC ;
APPELLA, E ;
YAMADA, M ;
MATSUSHIMA, K ;
EDWARDS, BFP ;
CLORE, GM ;
GRONENBORN, AM ;
WLODAWER, A .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1991, 88 (02) :502-506
[4]   SOLUTION OF THE PHASE PROBLEM IN THE X-RAY-DIFFRACTION METHOD FOR PROTEINS WITH THE NUCLEAR MAGNETIC-RESONANCE SOLUTION STRUCTURE AS INITIAL MODEL - PATTERSON SEARCH AND REFINEMENT FOR THE ALPHA-AMYLASE INHIBITOR TENDAMISTAT [J].
BRAUN, W ;
EPP, O ;
WUTHRICH, K ;
HUBER, R .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1989, 206 (04) :669-676
[5]   SOLUTION OF A PROTEIN CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE WITH A MODEL OBTAINED FROM NMR INTERPROTON DISTANCE RESTRAINTS [J].
BRUNGER, AT ;
CAMPBELL, RL ;
CLORE, GM ;
GRONENBORN, AM ;
KARPLUS, M ;
PETSKO, GA ;
TEETER, MM .
SCIENCE, 1987, 235 (4792) :1049-1053
[6]   The crystal structure of the immunity protein of colicin E7 suggests a possible colicin-interacting surface [J].
Chak, KF ;
Safo, MK ;
Ku, WY ;
Hsieh, SY ;
Yuan, HS .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (13) :6437-6442
[7]  
Cohn E.J., 1943, PROTEINS AMINO ACIDS, P370
[8]  
COOPER PC, 1984, J GEN MICROBIOL, V130, P209
[9]  
CRAMER WA, 1995, ANNU REV BIOPH BIOM, V24, P611, DOI 10.1146/annurev.biophys.24.1.611
[10]   CRYSTAL PACKING IN 6 CRYSTAL FORMS OF PANCREATIC RIBONUCLEASE [J].
CROSIO, MP ;
JANIN, J ;
JULLIEN, M .
JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY, 1992, 228 (01) :243-251