Impact of reservoir geochemistry on low salinity waterflooding: Global sensitivity analysis

被引:6
|
作者
Elgendy, Ahmed M. S. [1 ]
Porta, Giovanni M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Eni SpA, Via Emilia 1, I-20097 Milan, Italy
[2] Politecn Milan, Dipartimento Ingn Civile & Ambientale, Piazza Leonardo da Vinci 32, I-20133 Milan, Italy
关键词
EOR; Global sensitivity analysis; Low salinity; Geochemical modelling and Numerical; simulation; IMPROVED OIL-RECOVERY; CARBONATE RESERVOIRS; WATER INJECTION; CRUDE-OIL; WETTABILITY; EXPANSION; MECHANISM; MINERALS; INSIGHTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.petrol.2021.109056
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Low salinity waterflooding (LSW) has been receiving an increasing attention in the industry as it has several advantages over alternative strategies to enhanced oil recovery (EOR), i.e. i) outperforms conventional EOR methods in terms of additional oil recovery, ii) involves lower chemical costs, iii) it is environmentally friendly, and iv) requires a relatively simple field process implementation. We quantify low salinity effect (LSE) on oil recovery upon employing a mechanistic geochemical model under parametric uncertainty. Our ultimate goal is to characterize the impact of the reservoir rock and fluid properties on the performance of LSW. To this end, we propose a geochemical model of LSW built within a commercial compositional reservoir simulator. The model is designed to account for geochemical processes recently identified through experimental and pore-scale analyses, i.e. double layer expansion, multiple ion exchange and mineral dissolution/precipitation. The geochemical model outputs were first compared with two low salinity coreflood experiments reported in the literature and then applied to predict oil recovery under parametric uncertainty. Our study encompasses the effect of formation water ionic concentrations, rock mineralogy and reservoir temperature on LSW performance. Global sensitivity indices were calculated considering reasonable intervals of variability of the studied parameters. Our analysis focuses on the total oil recovery at three different time scales: 6 months (before water breakthrough), 2 years (after water breakthrough), and 10 years (the end of the injection). The results are discussed in the frame of quantitative screening criteria development, which is necessary to assess whether a given reservoir may be a promising candidate for LSW. Our results indicate that reservoir temperature is the parameter which demonstrated the most significant impact on the LSW performance. Ion concentration also displays a significant influence on oil recovery, and we identify different chemical species in carbonate and sandstone environments. On the contrary, mineral composition shows a limited influence on oil recovery. In particular, our results show that clay presence might be not essential for LSW to be effective in sandstone reservoirs. We discuss the impact of our results in the context of experimental design aimed at an improved constraining of LSW parameterization. Our study suggests that reservoir fluid composition (e.g., concentration of Ca2+, SO42+ and Na+), in addition to reservoir temperature, should be prioritized in future experimental campaigns to better understand its influence on LSW under different reservoir and operation conditions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Low salinity waterflooding for a carbonate reservoir: Experimental evaluation and numerical interpretation
    Nasralla, Ramez A.
    Mahani, Hassan
    van der Linde, Hilbert A.
    Marcelis, Fons H. M.
    Masalmeh, Shehadeh K.
    Sergienko, Ekaterina
    Brussee, Niels J.
    Pieterse, Sebastiaan G. J.
    Basu, Saptarshi
    JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2018, 164 : 640 - 654
  • [2] Analysis of Low Salinity Waterflooding in Bastrykskoye Field
    Ahmetgareev, V.
    Zeinijahromi, A.
    Badalyan, A.
    Khisamov, R.
    Bedrikovetsky, P.
    PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 33 (05) : 561 - 570
  • [3] A critical review of carbonate reservoir wettability modification during low salinity waterflooding
    Perekaboere Ivy Sagbana
    Kwame Sarkodie
    Wilberforce Aggrey Nkrumah
    Petroleum, 2023, 9 (03) : 317 - 330
  • [4] Pore-scale imaging and analysis of low salinity waterflooding in a heterogeneous carbonate rock at reservoir conditions
    Selem, Ahmed M.
    Agenet, Nicolas
    Gao, Ying
    Raeini, Ali Q.
    Blunt, Martin J.
    Bijeljic, Branko
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2021, 11 (01)
  • [5] A critical review of carbonate reservoir wettability modification during low salinity waterflooding
    Sagbana, Perekaboere Ivy
    Sarkodie, Kwame
    Nkrumah, Wilberforce Aggrey
    PETROLEUM, 2023, 9 (03) : 317 - 330
  • [6] Pore-scale imaging and analysis of low salinity waterflooding in a heterogeneous carbonate rock at reservoir conditions
    Ahmed M. Selem
    Nicolas Agenet
    Ying Gao
    Ali Q. Raeini
    Martin J. Blunt
    Branko Bijeljic
    Scientific Reports, 11
  • [7] Visualizing low-salinity waterflooding
    1600, Society of Petroleum Engineers (SPE) (66):
  • [8] Modeling Low-Salinity Waterflooding
    Jerauld, Gary R.
    Lin, C. Y.
    Webb, Kevin J.
    Seccombe, Jim C.
    SPE RESERVOIR EVALUATION & ENGINEERING, 2008, 11 (06) : 1000 - 1012
  • [9] Quantifying the Low Salinity Waterflooding Effect
    Chaabi, Omar
    Al Kobaisi, Mohammed
    Haroun, Mohamed
    ENERGIES, 2021, 14 (07)
  • [10] Macroscale Modeling of Geochemistry Influence on Polymer and Low-Salinity Waterflooding in Carbonate Oil Reservoirs
    Limaluka, Angelo Kennedy Lino
    Elakneswaran, Yogarajah
    Hiroyoshi, Naoki
    ACS OMEGA, 2024,