Social stigma and compounded losses: quality-of-life issues for multiple-birth families

被引:67
作者
Ellison, MA [1 ]
Hall, JE [1 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Reprod Endocrine Unit, Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Sch Med, Boston, MA 02114 USA
关键词
multiple births; infertility; social stigma; qualitative research;
D O I
10.1016/S0015-0282(03)00659-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine the quality-of-life domains most impacted by multiple births. Design: Focus groups, qualitative research. Setting: Human volunteers in a medical research environment. Patient(s): Forty-three mothers, 29 raising multiple-birth children, 13 raising singletons, identified from random and convenience samples. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Maternal self-reports of the psychosocial sequelae of multiple or singleton births, based on qualitative data analysis of transcribed group discussions. Result(s): The quality-of-life domains that were most impacted by raising multiple birth children were social stigma, pregnancy loss, marital satisfaction, children's health, unmet family needs, parenting stress, maternal depression, and the infertility experience. Conclusion(s): Qualitative methods identified two novel quality-of-life domains in iatrogenic multiple birth families: social stigma and compounded losses. An unexpected finding was the potential for increased marital solidification as parents coped with the inordinate stresses of multiple births. As anticipated, children's health, unmet family needs, maternal depression, and parental stress were key areas of concern. In addition, the infertility experience had a lasting impact. These findings are significant, given that at least 38% of all assisted conceptions result in a multiple birth. This study lays the groundwork for further research on the impact of iatrogenic multiple births. (C) 2003 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:405 / 414
页数:10
相关论文
共 51 条
[31]   Practice patterns among board-certified reproductive endocrinologists regarding high-order multiple gestations: A United States National Survey [J].
Hock, DL ;
Seifer, DB ;
Kontopoulos, E ;
Ananth, CV .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (05) :763-770
[32]   Multiple births: how are we doing? [J].
Jones, HW .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (01) :17-21
[33]  
Krueger R., 2009, Focus Groups: A practical guide for applied research
[34]   Preeclampsia in multiple gestation: The role of assisted reproductive technologies [J].
Lynch, A ;
McDuffie, R ;
Murphy, J ;
Faber, K ;
Orleans, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 99 (03) :445-451
[35]   AN AGENDA FOR MEETING THE SPECIAL NEEDS OF MULTIPLE BIRTH FAMILIES [J].
MALMSTROM, PM ;
BIALE, R .
ACTA GENETICAE MEDICAE ET GEMELLOLOGIAE, 1990, 39 (04) :507-514
[36]  
Martin JA., 2000, Nat. Vital Stat. Syst, V50, P1
[37]   Psychosocial adjustment and the quality of the mother-child relationship at four months postpartum after conception by in vitro fertilization [J].
McMahon, CA ;
Ungerer, JA ;
Tennant, C ;
Saunders, D .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 68 (03) :492-500
[38]   MATERNAL REACTIONS TO THE BIRTH OF TRIPLETS [J].
ROBIN, M ;
BYDLOWSKI, M ;
CAHEN, F ;
JOSSE, D .
ACTA GENETICAE MEDICAE ET GEMELLOLOGIAE, 1991, 40 (01) :41-51
[39]   High-order multiple pregnancy: is it a matter of inaction or a consequence of practice patterns? [J].
Rosenwaks, Z ;
Chung, PH .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2003, 79 (01) :25-26
[40]   Pregnancy complications and maternal cardiovascular risk: opportunities for intervention and screening? [J].
Sattar, N ;
Greer, IA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 325 (7356) :157-160