Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin

被引:10
作者
Dundar, Mine [1 ]
Cal, Ebru [1 ]
Gokce, Bulent [1 ]
Turkun, Murat [2 ]
Ozcan, Mutlu [3 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Conservat Dent, Sch Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Dent Mat Unit, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Adhesives; Ceramics; Desensitizers; Resin cement; Shear bond strength; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; CAVITY DISINFECTANTS; DEMINERALIZED DENTIN; COMPOSITE RESIN; LUTING AGENTS; RESTORATIONS; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL; SURFACE; HEMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-009-0328-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Effect of desensitizers on the bond strength of resin cements to dentin was evaluated. Intact premolars (N=90) were embedded in polymethyl methacrylate; dentin surfaces were exposed, and they were randomly divided into two main groups of cements (Duolink (D), Variolink II (V); n=45 per group) and then into three desensitizer subgroups (n=15 per subgroup). Teeth in controls (C) were treated according to cements' adhesion protocols; the other two groups received either fluoride[Aqua-Prep F (F)] or triclosan-based [Seal&Protect (T)] desensitizers. Ceramic disks (Empress 2) were adhered; specimens were thermocycled (x5,000 cycles, 5-55 +/- 1 degrees C, dwell time 30 s) and subjected to shear bond strength test (MPa +/- SD) in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed 1 mm/min). Failure types were classified using scanning electron microscope. For V, application of both desensitizers (29.6 +/- 7.8 and 22.8 +/- 2.8 for F and T, respectively) did not present significantly different results than that of the VC (21.2 +/- 2.3; p>0.05, one-way ANOVA). In D, F (20.6 +/- 2.4) showed significantly higher results (p<0.05) than those in T (16.1 +/- 3.9) and DC group (15.2 +/- 2.3). V showed significantly higher results than D (p<0.05, Bonferroni). F and T did not negatively affect the bond strength results with D and V. Adhesive failures were more frequent with both T (84%) and F (66%) in D; cohesive failures in the cement (88%) were more commonly observed with F in V. Both F and T desensitizers can be safely used prior to final cementation but F in combination with V seems to be more reliable, considering both the bond strength and the failure types.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[31]   ADHESION TESTING OF DENTIN BONDING AGENTS - A REVIEW [J].
PASHLEY, DH ;
SANO, H ;
CIUCCHI, B ;
YOSHIYAMA, M ;
CARVALHO, RM .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1995, 11 (02) :117-125
[32]   Effects of HEMA on water evaporation from water-HEMA mixtures [J].
Pashley, EL ;
Zhang, Y ;
Lockwood, PE ;
Rueggeberg, FA ;
Pashley, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1998, 14 (01) :6-10
[33]  
Perdigao J, 1994, Am J Dent, V7, P81
[34]  
Pilo R, 2001, OPER DENT, V26, P569
[35]  
Reis A, 2003, J ADHES DENT, V5, P183
[36]  
Richardson D, 1991, Int J Prosthodont, V4, P219
[37]  
Ritter A V, 2000, J Esthet Dent, V12, P85, DOI 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2000.tb00205.x
[38]  
Say EC, 2004, QUINTESSENCE INT, V35, P56
[39]   Effect of ceramic surface treatment on the shear bond strengths of two resin luting agents to all-ceramic materials [J].
Saygili, G ;
Sahmali, S .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 30 (07) :758-764
[40]   Effect of desensitizers on bond strength of adhesive luting agents to dentin [J].
Soeno, K ;
Taira, Y ;
Matsumura, H ;
Atsuta, M .
JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION, 2001, 28 (12) :1122-1128