Influence of fluoride- or triclosan-based desensitizing agents on adhesion of resin cements to dentin

被引:10
作者
Dundar, Mine [1 ]
Cal, Ebru [1 ]
Gokce, Bulent [1 ]
Turkun, Murat [2 ]
Ozcan, Mutlu [3 ]
机构
[1] Ege Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Sch Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Ege Univ, Dept Conservat Dent, Sch Dent, TR-35100 Izmir, Turkey
[3] Univ Zurich, Ctr Dent & Oral Med, Clin Fixed & Removable Prosthodont & Dent Mat Sci, Dent Mat Unit, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Adhesives; Ceramics; Desensitizers; Resin cement; Shear bond strength; SHEAR BOND STRENGTH; CAVITY DISINFECTANTS; DEMINERALIZED DENTIN; COMPOSITE RESIN; LUTING AGENTS; RESTORATIONS; SYSTEMS; ENAMEL; SURFACE; HEMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00784-009-0328-7
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Effect of desensitizers on the bond strength of resin cements to dentin was evaluated. Intact premolars (N=90) were embedded in polymethyl methacrylate; dentin surfaces were exposed, and they were randomly divided into two main groups of cements (Duolink (D), Variolink II (V); n=45 per group) and then into three desensitizer subgroups (n=15 per subgroup). Teeth in controls (C) were treated according to cements' adhesion protocols; the other two groups received either fluoride[Aqua-Prep F (F)] or triclosan-based [Seal&Protect (T)] desensitizers. Ceramic disks (Empress 2) were adhered; specimens were thermocycled (x5,000 cycles, 5-55 +/- 1 degrees C, dwell time 30 s) and subjected to shear bond strength test (MPa +/- SD) in a universal testing machine (crosshead speed 1 mm/min). Failure types were classified using scanning electron microscope. For V, application of both desensitizers (29.6 +/- 7.8 and 22.8 +/- 2.8 for F and T, respectively) did not present significantly different results than that of the VC (21.2 +/- 2.3; p>0.05, one-way ANOVA). In D, F (20.6 +/- 2.4) showed significantly higher results (p<0.05) than those in T (16.1 +/- 3.9) and DC group (15.2 +/- 2.3). V showed significantly higher results than D (p<0.05, Bonferroni). F and T did not negatively affect the bond strength results with D and V. Adhesive failures were more frequent with both T (84%) and F (66%) in D; cohesive failures in the cement (88%) were more commonly observed with F in V. Both F and T desensitizers can be safely used prior to final cementation but F in combination with V seems to be more reliable, considering both the bond strength and the failure types.
引用
收藏
页码:579 / 586
页数:8
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
al-Salehi S K, 1997, Quintessence Int, V28, P717
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, 11405 ISOTS
[3]  
Arrais César Augusto Galvão, 2004, J. Appl. Oral Sci., V12, P144, DOI 10.1590/S1678-77572004000200012
[4]   THE CAUSE OF POSTRESTORATIVE SENSITIVITY AND ITS PREVENTION [J].
BRANNSTROM, M .
JOURNAL OF ENDODONTICS, 1986, 12 (10) :475-481
[5]  
Brannstrom M, 1996, Quintessence Int, V27, P673
[6]  
BRANNSTROM M, 1987, OPER DENT, V12, P158
[7]   Effect of an antibacterial adhesive on the bond strength of three different luting resin composites [J].
Cal, Ebru ;
Tuerkuen, L. Sebnem ;
Tuerkuen, Murat ;
Toman, Muhittin ;
Toksavul, Suna .
JOURNAL OF DENTISTRY, 2006, 34 (06) :372-380
[8]  
Cardoso Paulo Eduardo Capel, 2002, J Adhes Dent, V4, P291
[9]   FORMATION OF PHOSPHATE-CONTAINING CALCIUM-FLUORIDE AT THE EXPENSE OF ENAMEL, HYDROXYAPATITE AND FLUORAPATITE [J].
CHRISTOFFERSEN, J ;
CHRISTOFFERSEN, MR ;
ARENDS, J ;
LEONARDSEN, ES .
CARIES RESEARCH, 1995, 29 (03) :223-230
[10]   Influence of bond quality on failure load of leucite- and lithia disilicate-based ceramics [J].
Clelland, Nancy L. ;
Ramirez, Adriana ;
Katsube, Noriko ;
Seghi, Robert R. .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 97 (01) :18-24