Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates

被引:101
作者
Hewett, David G. [1 ]
Rex, Douglas K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
TRANSPARENT CAP; WITHDRAWAL TIMES; WHITE-LIGHT; NARROW-BAND; MUCOSAL RESECTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; WIDE-ANGLE; IMPACT; HOOD; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.030
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Failures of adenoma detection diminish the effectiveness of colonoscopy. Objective: This study investigated the impact of cap-fitted colonoscopy (CFC) on the adenoma miss rate at colonoscopy. Design: Randomized, tandem colonoscopy study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: This study involved patients undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: Patients were randomized to undergo cap-fitted (n = 52) or regular, high-definition (n = 48) colonoscopy before undergoing a second colonoscopy by the alternate method. During CFC, a plastic cap or hood was attached to the tip of the colonoscope, which was used to flatten haustral folds and improve mucosal exposure. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the miss rate for adenomas between patients who underwent CFC first and patients who underwent regular colonoscopy first. Results: A total of 238 adenomas were detected in 67 patients (67%), with a combined overall miss rate of 27.7%, comprising 66 missed adenomas in 38 patients. Patients undergoing initial CFC had a significantly lower miss rate for all adenomas compared with that of patients undergoing regular colonoscopy (21% vs 33%, P = .039). Miss rates with CFC were significantly lower for adenomas of <= 5 mm (22% vs 35%; P = .037). There was no significant difference in per-patient miss rates between the initial CFC group (51%, n = 18) and the initial regular colonoscopy group (63%, n = 20, P = .36). Limitations: Single-center study with two endoscopists. Conclusion: CFC reduces miss rates for all adenomas and specifically for small adenomas. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00577083) (Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:775-81.)
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 781
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   Narrow-Band Versus White-Light High Definition Television Endoscopic Imaging for Screening Colonoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial [J].
Adler, Andreas ;
Aschenbeck, Jens ;
Yenerim, Timur ;
Mayr, Michael ;
Aminalai, Alireza ;
Drossel, Rolf ;
Schroeder, Andreas ;
Scheel, Matthias ;
Wiedenmann, Bertram ;
Roesch, Thomas .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (02) :410-416
[2]   The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration [J].
Altman, DG ;
Schulz, KF ;
Moher, D ;
Egger, M ;
Davidoff, F ;
Elbourne, D ;
Gotzsche, PC ;
Lang, T .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) :663-694
[3]   Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy [J].
Barclay, Robert L. ;
Vicari, Joseph J. ;
Doughty, Andrea S. ;
Johanson, John F. ;
Greenlaw, Roger L. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) :2533-2541
[4]   Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: Initial experiences from a pilot study [J].
Dafnis, GM .
ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (05) :381-384
[5]   Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group [J].
DeMarco, Daniel C. ;
Odstrcil, Elizabeth ;
Lara, Luis F. ;
Bass, David ;
Herdman, Chase ;
Kinney, Timothy ;
Gupta, Kapil ;
Wolf, Leon ;
Dewar, Thomas ;
Deas, Thomas M. ;
Mehta, Manoj K. ;
Anwer, M. Badar ;
Pellish, Randall ;
Hamilton, J. Kent ;
Polter, Daniel ;
Reddy, K. Gautham ;
Hanan, Ira .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) :542-550
[6]   A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique [J].
East, J. E. ;
Stavrindis, M. ;
Thomas-Gibson, S. ;
Guenther, T. ;
Tekkis, P. P. ;
Saunders, B. P. .
ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 28 (06) :768-776
[7]   Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: A randomized controlled trial [J].
Fatima, Hala ;
Rex, Douglas K. ;
Rothstein, Richard ;
Rahmani, Emad ;
Nehme, Omar ;
Dewitt, John ;
Helper, Debra ;
Toor, Arifa ;
Bensen, Steven .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (01) :109-114
[8]   Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial [J].
Harada, Yoshihiro ;
Hirasawa, Dai ;
Fujita, Naotaka ;
Noda, Yutaka ;
Kobayashi, Go ;
Ishida, Kazuhiko ;
Yonechi, Makoto ;
Ito, Kei ;
Suzuki, Takashi ;
Sugawara, Toshiki ;
Horaguchi, Jun ;
Takasawa, Osamu ;
Obana, Takashi ;
Oohira, Tetsuya ;
Onochi, Kengo ;
Kanno, Yoshihide ;
Kuroha, Masatake ;
Iwai, Wataru .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (03) :637-644
[9]   Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps:: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies [J].
Heresbach, D. ;
Barrioz, T. ;
Lapalus, M. G. ;
Coumaros, D. ;
Bauret, P. ;
Potier, P. ;
Sautereau, D. ;
Boustiere, C. ;
Grimaud, J. C. ;
Barthelemy, C. ;
See, J. ;
Serraj, I. ;
Halluin, P. N. D. ;
Branger, B. ;
Ponchan, T. .
ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (04) :284-290
[10]   Does Colonoscopy Work? [J].
Hewett, David G. ;
Kahi, Charles J. ;
Rex, Douglas K. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (01) :67-77