Cap-fitted colonoscopy: a randomized, tandem colonoscopy study of adenoma miss rates

被引:102
作者
Hewett, David G. [1 ]
Rex, Douglas K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Indiana Univ Sch Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol Hepatol, Indianapolis, IN USA
关键词
TRANSPARENT CAP; WITHDRAWAL TIMES; WHITE-LIGHT; NARROW-BAND; MUCOSAL RESECTION; CONTROLLED-TRIAL; WIDE-ANGLE; IMPACT; HOOD; EFFICACY;
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2010.04.030
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Failures of adenoma detection diminish the effectiveness of colonoscopy. Objective: This study investigated the impact of cap-fitted colonoscopy (CFC) on the adenoma miss rate at colonoscopy. Design: Randomized, tandem colonoscopy study. Setting: University hospital. Patients: This study involved patients undergoing elective screening or surveillance colonoscopy. Intervention: Patients were randomized to undergo cap-fitted (n = 52) or regular, high-definition (n = 48) colonoscopy before undergoing a second colonoscopy by the alternate method. During CFC, a plastic cap or hood was attached to the tip of the colonoscope, which was used to flatten haustral folds and improve mucosal exposure. Main Outcome Measurements: The primary outcome measure was the miss rate for adenomas between patients who underwent CFC first and patients who underwent regular colonoscopy first. Results: A total of 238 adenomas were detected in 67 patients (67%), with a combined overall miss rate of 27.7%, comprising 66 missed adenomas in 38 patients. Patients undergoing initial CFC had a significantly lower miss rate for all adenomas compared with that of patients undergoing regular colonoscopy (21% vs 33%, P = .039). Miss rates with CFC were significantly lower for adenomas of <= 5 mm (22% vs 35%; P = .037). There was no significant difference in per-patient miss rates between the initial CFC group (51%, n = 18) and the initial regular colonoscopy group (63%, n = 20, P = .36). Limitations: Single-center study with two endoscopists. Conclusion: CFC reduces miss rates for all adenomas and specifically for small adenomas. (Clinical trial registration number: NCT00577083) (Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:775-81.)
引用
收藏
页码:775 / 781
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
  • [1] Narrow-Band Versus White-Light High Definition Television Endoscopic Imaging for Screening Colonoscopy: A Prospective Randomized Trial
    Adler, Andreas
    Aschenbeck, Jens
    Yenerim, Timur
    Mayr, Michael
    Aminalai, Alireza
    Drossel, Rolf
    Schroeder, Andreas
    Scheel, Matthias
    Wiedenmann, Bertram
    Roesch, Thomas
    [J]. GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2009, 136 (02) : 410 - 416
  • [2] The revised CONSORT statement for reporting randomized trials: Explanation and elaboration
    Altman, DG
    Schulz, KF
    Moher, D
    Egger, M
    Davidoff, F
    Elbourne, D
    Gotzsche, PC
    Lang, T
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (08) : 663 - 694
  • [3] Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy
    Barclay, Robert L.
    Vicari, Joseph J.
    Doughty, Andrea S.
    Johanson, John F.
    Greenlaw, Roger L.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (24) : 2533 - 2541
  • [4] Technical considerations and patient comfort in total colonoscopy with and without a transparent cap: Initial experiences from a pilot study
    Dafnis, GM
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 32 (05) : 381 - 384
  • [5] Impact of experience with a retrograde-viewing device on adenoma detection rates and withdrawal times during colonoscopy: the Third Eye Retroscope study group
    DeMarco, Daniel C.
    Odstrcil, Elizabeth
    Lara, Luis F.
    Bass, David
    Herdman, Chase
    Kinney, Timothy
    Gupta, Kapil
    Wolf, Leon
    Dewar, Thomas
    Deas, Thomas M.
    Mehta, Manoj K.
    Anwer, M. Badar
    Pellish, Randall
    Hamilton, J. Kent
    Polter, Daniel
    Reddy, K. Gautham
    Hanan, Ira
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2010, 71 (03) : 542 - 550
  • [6] A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique
    East, J. E.
    Stavrindis, M.
    Thomas-Gibson, S.
    Guenther, T.
    Tekkis, P. P.
    Saunders, B. P.
    [J]. ALIMENTARY PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 28 (06) : 768 - 776
  • [7] Cecal insertion and withdrawal times with wide-angle versus standard colonoscopes: A randomized controlled trial
    Fatima, Hala
    Rex, Douglas K.
    Rothstein, Richard
    Rahmani, Emad
    Nehme, Omar
    Dewitt, John
    Helper, Debra
    Toor, Arifa
    Bensen, Steven
    [J]. CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (01) : 109 - 114
  • [8] Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial
    Harada, Yoshihiro
    Hirasawa, Dai
    Fujita, Naotaka
    Noda, Yutaka
    Kobayashi, Go
    Ishida, Kazuhiko
    Yonechi, Makoto
    Ito, Kei
    Suzuki, Takashi
    Sugawara, Toshiki
    Horaguchi, Jun
    Takasawa, Osamu
    Obana, Takashi
    Oohira, Tetsuya
    Onochi, Kengo
    Kanno, Yoshihide
    Kuroha, Masatake
    Iwai, Wataru
    [J]. GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2009, 69 (03) : 637 - 644
  • [9] Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps:: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies
    Heresbach, D.
    Barrioz, T.
    Lapalus, M. G.
    Coumaros, D.
    Bauret, P.
    Potier, P.
    Sautereau, D.
    Boustiere, C.
    Grimaud, J. C.
    Barthelemy, C.
    See, J.
    Serraj, I.
    Halluin, P. N. D.
    Branger, B.
    Ponchan, T.
    [J]. ENDOSCOPY, 2008, 40 (04) : 284 - 290
  • [10] Does Colonoscopy Work?
    Hewett, David G.
    Kahi, Charles J.
    Rex, Douglas K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL COMPREHENSIVE CANCER NETWORK, 2010, 8 (01): : 67 - 77