Quantifying ecological and social drivers of ecological surprise

被引:16
|
作者
Filbee-Dexter, Karen [1 ]
Symons, Celia C. [2 ]
Jones, Kristal [3 ]
Haig, Heather A. [4 ]
Pittman, Jeremy [5 ]
Alexander, Steven M. [3 ,6 ]
Burke, Matthew J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Water Res, Marine Sect, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Natl Socioenvironm Synth Ctr, Annapolis, MD USA
[4] Univ Regina, Dept Biol, Limnol Lab, Regina, SK, Canada
[5] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Fac Environm, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[6] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] McGill Univ, McGill Sch Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
ecological surprise; eutrophication; fishery collapse; mountain pine beetle; natural resource management; social-ecological system; spatial temporal mismatch; structural equation model; MANAGING ECOSYSTEMS; REGIME SHIFTS; SYSTEMS; RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; FISHERIES; SHALLOW; FISH;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13171
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. A key challenge facing ecologists and ecosystem managers is understanding what drives unexpected shifts in ecosystems and limits the effectiveness of human interventions. Research that integrates and analyses data from natural and social systems can provide important insight for unravelling the complexity of these dynamics. It is, therefore, a critical step towards the development of evidence-based, whole-system management approaches. 2. To examine our ability to influence ecosystems that are behaving in unexpected ways, we explore three prominent cases of "ecological surprise." We captured the social-ecological systems (SES) using key variables and interactions from Ostrom's SES framework, which integrates broader ecosystem processes (e.g. climate, connectivity), management variables (e.g. quotas, restrictions, monitoring), resource use behaviours (e.g. harvesting) and the resource unit (e.g. trees, fish, clean water) being managed. 3. Structural equation modelling revealed that management interventions often influenced resource use behaviours (e.g. rules and limits strongly affected harvest or pollution), but they did not have a significant effect on the abundance of the managed resource. Instead, most resource variability was related to ecological processes and feedbacks operating at broader spatial or temporal scales than management interventions, which locked the resource system into the degraded state.
引用
收藏
页码:2135 / 2146
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Social and ecological drivers of behavior that prevents aquatic invasive species transport
    Moore, Alison
    Ford, Danika
    Golebie, Elizabeth
    Joffe-Nelson, North
    Hitzroth, Greg
    Huegelmann, Amanda
    King, Sarah
    Stein, Jeffrey A.
    van Riper, Carena J.
    BIOLOGICAL INVASIONS, 2024, 26 (06) : 1845 - 1859
  • [22] The Social, Economic, and Ecological Drivers of Planning and Management of Urban River Parks
    Zingraff-Hamed, Aude
    Serra-Llobet, Anna
    Kondolf, G. Mathias
    FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE CITIES, 2022, 4
  • [23] Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution
    Mauricio González-Forero
    Andy Gardner
    Nature, 2018, 557 : 554 - 557
  • [24] Forging linkages between social drivers and ecological processes in the residential landscape
    Souto, Leesa A.
    Listopad, Claudia M. C. S.
    Bohlen, Patrick J.
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2019, 185 : 96 - 106
  • [25] Seasonal grouping dynamics in a territorial vulture: ecological drivers and social consequences
    Thijs van Overveld
    Laura Gangoso
    Marina García-Alfonso
    Willem Bouten
    Manuel de la Riva
    José Antonio Donázar
    Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 2020, 74
  • [26] Conceptualizing social-ecological drivers of change in urban forest patches
    Lea R. Johnson
    Michelle L. Johnson
    Myla F. J. Aronson
    Lindsay K. Campbell
    Megan E. Carr
    Mysha Clarke
    Vincent D’Amico
    Lindsay Darling
    Tedward Erker
    Robert T. Fahey
    Kristen L. King
    Katherine Lautar
    Dexter H. Locke
    Anita T. Morzillo
    Stephanie Pincetl
    Luke Rhodes
    John Paul Schmit
    Lydia Scott
    Nancy F. Sonti
    Urban Ecosystems, 2021, 24 : 633 - 648
  • [27] Seasonal grouping dynamics in a territorial vulture: ecological drivers and social consequences
    van Overveld, Thijs
    Gangoso, Laura
    Garcia-Alfonso, Marina
    Bouten, Willem
    de la Riva, Manuel
    Donazar, Jose Antonio
    BEHAVIORAL ECOLOGY AND SOCIOBIOLOGY, 2020, 74 (02)
  • [28] Drivers and trajectories of social and ecological change in the Karoo, South Africa</n>
    Walker, Cherryl
    Milton, Suzanne J.
    O'Connor, Tim G.
    Maguire, Judy M.
    Dean, W. Richard J.
    AFRICAN JOURNAL OF RANGE & FORAGE SCIENCE, 2018, 35 (3-4) : 157 - 177
  • [29] Social-ecological drivers of metropolitan residents' comfort living with wildlife
    Haight, Jeffrey D.
    Larson, Kelli L.
    Clark, Jeffrey A. G.
    Lewis, Jesse S.
    Hall, Sharon J.
    FRONTIERS IN CONSERVATION SCIENCE, 2023, 4
  • [30] Drivers of global mangrove loss and gain in social-ecological systems
    Hagger, Valerie
    Worthington, Thomas A.
    Lovelock, Catherine E.
    Adame, Maria Fernanda
    Amano, Tatsuya
    Brown, Benjamin M.
    Friess, Daniel A.
    Landis, Emily
    Mumby, Peter J.
    Morrison, Tiffany H.
    O'Brien, Katherine R.
    Wilson, Kerrie A.
    Zganjar, Chris
    Saunders, Megan, I
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2022, 13 (01)