Quantifying ecological and social drivers of ecological surprise

被引:16
|
作者
Filbee-Dexter, Karen [1 ]
Symons, Celia C. [2 ]
Jones, Kristal [3 ]
Haig, Heather A. [4 ]
Pittman, Jeremy [5 ]
Alexander, Steven M. [3 ,6 ]
Burke, Matthew J. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Norwegian Inst Water Res, Marine Sect, Oslo, Norway
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Natl Socioenvironm Synth Ctr, Annapolis, MD USA
[4] Univ Regina, Dept Biol, Limnol Lab, Regina, SK, Canada
[5] Univ Waterloo, Sch Planning, Fac Environm, Waterloo, ON, Canada
[6] Stockholm Univ, Stockholm Resilience Ctr, Stockholm, Sweden
[7] McGill Univ, Dept Nat Resource Sci, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[8] McGill Univ, McGill Sch Environm, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
ecological surprise; eutrophication; fishery collapse; mountain pine beetle; natural resource management; social-ecological system; spatial temporal mismatch; structural equation model; MANAGING ECOSYSTEMS; REGIME SHIFTS; SYSTEMS; RESILIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY; CONSERVATION; GOVERNANCE; FISHERIES; SHALLOW; FISH;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2664.13171
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
1. A key challenge facing ecologists and ecosystem managers is understanding what drives unexpected shifts in ecosystems and limits the effectiveness of human interventions. Research that integrates and analyses data from natural and social systems can provide important insight for unravelling the complexity of these dynamics. It is, therefore, a critical step towards the development of evidence-based, whole-system management approaches. 2. To examine our ability to influence ecosystems that are behaving in unexpected ways, we explore three prominent cases of "ecological surprise." We captured the social-ecological systems (SES) using key variables and interactions from Ostrom's SES framework, which integrates broader ecosystem processes (e.g. climate, connectivity), management variables (e.g. quotas, restrictions, monitoring), resource use behaviours (e.g. harvesting) and the resource unit (e.g. trees, fish, clean water) being managed. 3. Structural equation modelling revealed that management interventions often influenced resource use behaviours (e.g. rules and limits strongly affected harvest or pollution), but they did not have a significant effect on the abundance of the managed resource. Instead, most resource variability was related to ecological processes and feedbacks operating at broader spatial or temporal scales than management interventions, which locked the resource system into the degraded state.
引用
收藏
页码:2135 / 2146
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Quantifying drivers of change in social-ecological systems: land management impacts wildfire probability in forests of the western US
    Katherine J. Siegel
    Laurel Larsen
    Connor Stephens
    William Stewart
    Van Butsic
    Regional Environmental Change, 2022, 22
  • [12] Quantifying chaos for ecological stoichiometry
    Duarte, Jorge
    Januario, Cristina
    Martins, Nuno
    Sardanyes, Josep
    CHAOS, 2010, 20 (03)
  • [13] Quantifying economic and ecological sustainability
    Fath, Brian D.
    OCEAN & COASTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 108 : 13 - 19
  • [14] Quantifying the evidence for ecological synergies
    Darling, Emily S.
    Cote, Isabelle M.
    ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2008, 11 (12) : 1278 - 1286
  • [15] Ignorance and Surprise: Science, Society, and Ecological Design
    Ingram, Mrill
    SCIENCE AS CULTURE, 2012, 21 (04) : 582 - 586
  • [16] Ecological Drivers of Community Cohesion
    Gokhale, Chaitanya S.
    Velasque, Mariana
    Denton, Jai A.
    MSYSTEMS, 2023, 8 (01)
  • [17] Quantifying the sharing economy An approach for measuring the ecological, social, and economic effects
    Wruk, Dominika
    Oberg, Achim
    Friedrich-Schieback, Marina
    GAIA-ECOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES FOR SCIENCE AND SOCIETY, 2019, 28 : 184 - 189
  • [18] Inference of ecological and social drivers of human brain-size evolution
    Gonzalez-Forero, Mauricio
    Gardner, Andy
    NATURE, 2018, 557 (7706) : 554 - +
  • [19] Drivers of global mangrove loss and gain in social-ecological systems
    Valerie Hagger
    Thomas A. Worthington
    Catherine E. Lovelock
    Maria Fernanda Adame
    Tatsuya Amano
    Benjamin M. Brown
    Daniel A. Friess
    Emily Landis
    Peter J. Mumby
    Tiffany H. Morrison
    Katherine R. O’Brien
    Kerrie A. Wilson
    Chris Zganjar
    Megan I. Saunders
    Nature Communications, 13
  • [20] Conceptualizing social-ecological drivers of change in urban forest patches
    Johnson, Lea R.
    Johnson, Michelle L.
    Aronson, Myla F. J.
    Campbell, Lindsay K.
    Carr, Megan E.
    Clarke, Mysha
    D'Amico, Vincent
    Darling, Lindsay
    Erker, Tedward
    Fahey, Robert T.
    King, Kristen L.
    Lautar, Katherine
    Locke, Dexter H.
    Morzillo, Anita T.
    Pincetl, Stephanie
    Rhodes, Luke
    Schmit, John Paul
    Scott, Lydia
    Sonti, Nancy F.
    URBAN ECOSYSTEMS, 2021, 24 (04) : 633 - 648