Everything comes at a price: Considerations in modeling effort-based choice

被引:2
作者
Bialaszek, Wojciech [1 ]
Marcowski, Przemyslaw [1 ]
Mizak, Szymon [1 ]
机构
[1] SWPS Univ Social Sci & Humanities, Ctr Behav Res Decis Making, Inst Psychol, DecisionLab, Warsaw, Poland
关键词
Effort; Effort discounting; Effort paradox; Models of effort-based choice; PHYSICAL-ACTIVITY; MONETARY REWARDS; COGNITIVE EFFORT; DECISION-MAKING; SELF-CONTROL; HYPOTHETICAL REWARDS; DELAY; COST; REAL; MOTIVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.beproc.2022.104692
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
When observing human behavior, one of the key factors determining choice is effort. It is often assumed that people prefer an easier course of action when the alternative yields the same benefits. However, recent research demonstrates that this is not always the case: effort is not always costly and can also add value. A promising avenue to study effort-based choice is to utilize formal decision models that enable quantitative modeling. In this paper, we aim to present an overview of the current approaches to modeling effort-based choice and discuss some considerations that stem from theoretical and practical issues (present and previous) in studies on the role of effort, focusing on the connections and discrepancies between formal models and the findings from the body of empirical research. Considering that effort can, in some circumstances, act as a cost and as a benefit, reconciling these discrepancies is a practical and theoretical challenge that can ultimately lead to better predictions and increased model validity. Our review identifies and discusses these discrepancies providing direction for future empirical research.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   Role of Ratings of Perceived Exertion during Self-Paced Exercise: What are We Actually Measuring? [J].
Abbiss, Chris R. ;
Peiffer, Jeremiah J. ;
Meeusen, Romain ;
Skorski, Sabrina .
SPORTS MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (09) :1235-1243
[2]   Subjective (dis)utility of effort: mentally and physically demanding tasks [J].
Ackerman, Phillip L. ;
Tatel, Corey E. ;
Lyndgaard, Sibley F. .
COGNITIVE RESEARCH-PRINCIPLES AND IMPLICATIONS, 2020, 5 (01)
[3]   Rapid, precise, and reliable measurement of delay discounting using a Bayesian learning algorithm [J].
Ahn, Woo-Young ;
Gu, Hairong ;
Shen, Yitong ;
Haines, Nathaniel ;
Hahn, Hunter A. ;
Teater, Julie E. ;
Myung, Jay I. ;
Pitt, Mark A. .
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2020, 10 (01)
[4]   SPECIOUS REWARD - BEHAVIORAL THEORY OF IMPULSIVENESS AND IMPULSE CONTROL [J].
AINSLIE, G .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1975, 82 (04) :463-496
[5]   Preference for rewards that follow greater effort and greater delay [J].
Alessandri, Jerome ;
Darcheville, Jean-Claude ;
Delevoye-Turrell, Yvonne ;
Zentall, Thomas R. .
LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 2008, 36 (04) :352-358
[6]  
[Anonymous], J BIOMOL STRUCT 0424
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Reinforcement learning and decision making conference
[8]   THE EFFECT OF SEVERITY OF INITIATION ON LIKING FOR A GROUP [J].
ARONSON, E ;
MILLS, J .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1959, 59 (02) :177-181
[9]  
Ashour Mohamed, INT J HYDROGEN ENERG, V120, P439, DOI [10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.12.009, DOI 10.1016/J.IJHYDENE.2021.02.203, 10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.03.052]
[10]   Comparison of multiplicative and additive hyperbolic and hyperboloid discounting models in delayed lotteries involving gains and losses [J].
Bialaszek, Wojciech ;
Marcowski, Przemyslaw ;
Cox, David J. .
PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (05)