Intentional Normativism Meets Normative Supervenience and the Because Constraint

被引:3
作者
Laurier, Daniel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
D O I
10.1017/S001221731100031X
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
I explain and rebut four objections to the claim that attributions of intentional attitudes are normative judgments, all stemming, directly or indirectly, from the widespread assumption that the normative supervenes on the non-normative.
引用
收藏
页码:315 / 331
页数:17
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1993, SUPERVENIENCE MIND E
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2002, CONCEIVABILITY POSSI
  • [3] Boghossian P., 2005, Philosophy - Science - Scientific Philosophy. Main Lectures and Colloquia of Gap.5, Fifth International Congress of the Society for Analytical Philosophy, Bielefeld, P205
  • [4] Boghossian Paul., 2003, Philosophical Issues, V13, P32
  • [5] Broome J, 2000, NORMATIVITY, P78
  • [6] Does thought imply ought?
    Bykvist, Krister
    Hattiangadi, Anandi
    [J]. ANALYSIS, 2007, 67 (04) : 277 - 285
  • [7] REFERENCE AND DEFINITE DESCRIPTIONS
    DONNELLAN, KS
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL REVIEW, 1966, 75 (03) : 281 - 304
  • [8] Gibbard Allan., 1994, Philosophical Issues, V5, P95
  • [9] Is meaning normative?
    Hattiangadi, A
    [J]. MIND & LANGUAGE, 2006, 21 (02) : 220 - 240
  • [10] Korsgaard C.M., 1996, SOURCES NORMATIVITY