Simulation-based framework to evaluate resistivity of cooling strategies in buildings against overheating impact of climate change

被引:46
作者
Rahif, R. [1 ]
Hamdy, M. [2 ]
Homaei, S. [2 ]
Zhang, C. [3 ]
Holzer, P. [4 ]
Attia, S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liege, Fac Appl Sci, Dept UEE, Sustainable Bldg Design Lab, Liege, Belgium
[2] Norwegian Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Trondheim, Norway
[3] Aalborg Univ, Dept Built Environm, Thomas Manns Vej 23, DK-9220 Aalborg, Denmark
[4] Inst Bldg Res & Innovat, Wipplingerstr 23-03, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
关键词
Thermal comfort; Global warming; Overheating; Cooling strategy; Climate change; AIR-CONDITIONING SYSTEM; ENERGY PERFORMANCE; OFFICE BUILDINGS; THERMAL COMFORT; CONSUMPTION; VAV; BENCHMARKING; MITIGATION; DWELLINGS; TYPOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108599
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Over the last decades overheating in buildings has become a major concern. The situation is expected to worsen due to the current rate of climate change. Many efforts have been made to evaluate the future thermal performance of buildings and cooling technologies. In this paper, the term "climate change overheating resistivity " of cooling strategies is defined, and the calculation method is provided. A comprehensive simulation-based framework is then introduced, enabling the evaluation of a wide range of active and passive cooling strategies. The framework is based on the Indoor Overheating Degree (IOD), Ambient Warmness Degree (AWD), and Climate Change Overheating Resistivity (CCOR) as principal indicators allowing a multi-zonal approach in the quantification of indoor overheating risk and resistivity to climate change. To test the proposed framework, two air-based cooling strategies including a Variable Refrigerant Flow (VRF) unit coupled with a Dedicated Outdoor Air System (DOAS) (C01) and a Variable Air Volume (VAV) system (C02) are compared in six different locations/climates. The case study is a shoe box model representing a double-zone office building. In general, the C01 shows higher CCOR values between 2.04 and 19.16 than the C02 in different locations. Therefore, the C01 shows superior resistivity to the overheating impact of climate change compared to C02. The maximum CCOR value of 37.46 is resulted for the C01 in Brussels, representing the most resistant case, whereas the minimum CCOR value of 9.24 is achieved for the C02 in Toronto, representing the least resistant case.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 87 条
  • [71] Nudging the adaptive thermal comfort model
    Parkinson, Thomas
    de Dear, Richard
    Brager, Gail
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2020, 206
  • [72] Investigating the potential of overheating in UK dwellings as a consequence of extant climate change
    Peacock, A. D.
    Jenkins, D. P.
    Kane, D.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2010, 38 (07) : 3277 - 3288
  • [73] Review on Time-Integrated Overheating Evaluation Methods for Residential Buildings in Temperate Climates of Europe
    Rahif, R.
    Amaripadath, D.
    Attia, S.
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2021, 252
  • [74] Raustad R.A.`, 2013, Tech. Rep.
  • [75] Modelling the long-term effect of climate change on a zero energy and carbon dioxide building through energy efficiency and renewables
    Rey-Hernandez, Javier M.
    Yousif, Charles
    Gatt, Damien
    Velasco-Gomez, Eloy
    San Jose-Alonso, Julio
    Javier Rey-Martinez, Francisco
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2018, 174 : 85 - 96
  • [76] The potential of phase change materials to reduce domestic cooling energy loads for current and future UK climates
    Sajjadian, Seyed Masoud
    Lewis, John
    Sharples, Stephen
    [J]. ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2015, 93 : 83 - 89
  • [77] Energy simulation approach to air-conditioning system evaluation
    Sekhar, SC
    Yat, CJ
    [J]. BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 33 (06) : 397 - 408
  • [78] A review of existing building benchmarks and the development of a set of reference office buildings for England and Wales
    Shahrestani, Mehdi
    Yao, Runming
    Cook, Geoffrey K.
    [J]. INTELLIGENT BUILDINGS INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 6 (01) : 41 - 64
  • [79] AN OVERVIEW OF CMIP5 AND THE EXPERIMENT DESIGN
    Taylor, Karl E.
    Stouffer, Ronald J.
    Meehl, Gerald A.
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 93 (04) : 485 - 498
  • [80] Torcelini P., 2008, DOE commercial building benchmark models