Acceptability and design of video-based research on healthcare communication: Evidence and recommendations

被引:56
作者
Parry, Ruth [1 ]
Pino, Marco [1 ]
Faull, Christina [2 ,3 ]
Feathers, Luke [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Hlth Sci, Nottingham, England
[2] LOROS Hosp Care Leicestershire & Rutland, Leicester, Leics, England
[3] Med Univ Hosp Leicester, Leicester, Leics, England
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
ETHICS; CONSULTATIONS; INTERVENTION; CONVERSATION; PHOTOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.1016/j.pec.2016.03.013
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives: To contribute to understandings about acceptability and risks entailed in video-based research on healthcare communication. To generate recommendations for non-covert video-based research on healthcare communication - with a focus on maximising its acceptability to participants, and managing and reducing its risks. Methods: A literature review and synthesis of (a) empirical research on participant acceptability and risks of video recording; (b) regulations of professional and governmental bodies; (c) reviews and commentaries; (d) guidance and recommendations. These were gathered across several academic and professional fields (including medical, educational, and social scientific). Results: 36 publications were included in the review and synthesis (7 regulatory documents, 7 empirical, 4 reviews/commentaries, 18 guidance/recommendations). In the context of research aiming in some way to improve healthcare communication: Most people regard video-based research as acceptable and worthwhile, whilst also carrying risks. Concerns that recording could be detrimental to healthcare delivery are not confirmed by existing evidence. Numerous procedures to enhance acceptability and feasibility have been documented, and our recommendations collate these. Conclusion and practice implications: The recommendations are designed to support deliberations and decisions about individual studies and to support ethical scrutiny of proposed research studies. Whilst preliminary, it is nevertheless the most comprehensive and detailed currently available. (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1284
页数:14
相关论文
共 52 条
  • [1] Adomat R, 1999, Nurs Stand, V14, P37
  • [2] [Anonymous], SOCIOLOGICAL RES ONL
  • [3] [Anonymous], WORKING PAPER SERIES
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, HDB CONVERSATION ANA, DOI [10.1002/9781118325001.ch3/summary, DOI 10.1002/9781118325001.CH3/SUMMARY, 10.1002/9781118325001.ch3, DOI 10.1002/9781118325001.CH3]
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2010, INT COMMITTE MED J U
  • [6] Antaki C., 2011, Applied conversation analysis: Intervention and change in institutional talk
  • [7] Association of Social Anthropologists of the UK and the Commonwealth, 2011, ETH GUID GOOD RES PR
  • [8] Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review
    Barnett-Page, Elaine
    Thomas, James
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2009, 9
  • [9] Systematic reviews in the social sciences. A practical guide.
    Beelmann, Andreas
    [J]. EUROPEAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 2006, 11 (03) : 244 - 245
  • [10] Clinical photography and patient rights: the need for orthopraxy
    Berle, I.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS, 2008, 34 (02) : 89 - 92