Biosecurity-Based Interventions and Strategies To Reduce Campylobacter spp. on Poultry Farms

被引:175
|
作者
Newell, D. G. [1 ,2 ]
Elvers, K. T. [3 ]
Dopfer, D. [4 ]
Hansson, I. [5 ]
Jones, P. [6 ]
James, S. [3 ]
Gittins, J. [7 ]
Stern, N. J. [8 ]
Davies, R. [2 ]
Connerton, I. [9 ]
Pearson, D. [10 ]
Salvat, G. [11 ]
Allen, V. M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Foodborne Zoonoses Consultancy, Andover, England
[2] Vet Labs Agcy, Addlestone, Surrey, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Cent Vet Inst, Lelystad, Netherlands
[5] Natl Vet Inst, CRL Campylobacter, S-75007 Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Reading, Reading, Berks, England
[7] ADAS Pwllpeiran, Aberystwyth SY23 4AB, Dyfed, Wales
[8] ARS, Russell Res Ctr, USDA, Athens, GA USA
[9] Univ Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, England
[10] VION Agr Ltd, Livingston, Scotland
[11] AFSSA, Lab Etude & Rech Avicoles Porcines & Piscicoles, Ploufragan, France
关键词
BROILER-CHICKEN FLOCKS; RISK-FACTORS; PARTIAL DEPOPULATION; POTENTIAL SOURCES; FLY SCREENS; JEJUNI; COLONIZATION; PREVALENCE; CONTAMINATION; TRANSMISSION;
D O I
10.1128/AEM.01090-10
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
The prevention and control of Campylobacter colonization of poultry flocks are important public health strategies for the control of human campylobacteriosis. A critical review of the literature on interventions to control Campylobacter in poultry on farms was undertaken using a systematic approach. Although the focus of the review was on aspects appropriate to the United Kingdom poultry industry, the research reviewed was gathered from worldwide literature. Multiple electronic databases were employed to search the literature, in any language, from 1980 to September 2008. A primary set of 4,316 references was identified and scanned, using specific agreed-upon criteria, to select relevant references related to biosecurity-based interventions. The final library comprised 173 references. Identification of the sources of Campylobacter in poultry flocks was required to inform the development of targeted interventions to disrupt transmission routes. The approach used generally involved risk factor-based surveys related to culture-positive or -negative flocks, usually combined with a structured questionnaire. In addition, some studies, either in combination or independently, undertook intervention trials. Many of these studies were compromised by poor design, sampling, and statistical analysis. The evidence for each potential source and route of transmission on the poultry farm was reviewed critically, and the options for intervention were considered. The review concluded that, in most instances, biosecurity on conventional broiler farms can be enhanced and this should contribute to the reduction of flock colonization. However, complementary, non-biosecurity-based approaches will also be required in the future to maximize the reduction of Campylobacter-positive flocks at the farm level.
引用
收藏
页码:8605 / 8614
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Farm level risk factors for fluoroquinolone resistance in E. coli and thermophilic Campylobacter spp. on poultry farms
    Taylor, N. M.
    Wales, A. D.
    Ridley, A. M.
    Davies, R. H.
    AVIAN PATHOLOGY, 2016, 45 (05) : 559 - 568
  • [22] MLST Genotypes and Antibiotic Resistance of Campylobacter spp. Isolated from Poultry in Grenada
    Stone, Diana
    Davis, Margaret
    Baker, Katherine
    Besser, Tom
    Roopnarine, Rohini
    Sharma, Ravindra
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 2013
  • [23] Detection and quantification of Campylobacter spp. in Brazilian poultry processing plants
    Borges, Karen A.
    Cisco, Isabel C.
    Furian, Thales Q.
    Tedesco, Denise C.
    Rodrigues, Laura B.
    do Nascimento, Vladimir P.
    dos Santos, Luciana R.
    JOURNAL OF INFECTION IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES, 2020, 14 (01): : 109 - 113
  • [24] Campylobacter spp. isolation from infected poultry livers with and without necrotic lesions
    Lemos, Andre
    Morais, Luisa
    Fontes, Maria da Conceicao
    Pires, Isabel
    Vieira-Pinto, Madalena
    FOOD CONTROL, 2015, 50 : 236 - 242
  • [25] On farm interventions to minimise Campylobacter spp. contamination in chicken
    Lu, T.
    Marmion, M.
    Ferone, M.
    Wall, P.
    Scannell, A. G. M.
    BRITISH POULTRY SCIENCE, 2021, 62 (01) : 53 - 67
  • [26] INVESTIGATION OF Salmonella SPP. AND THERMOPHILIC Campylobacter SPP. IN FEEDS FROM COMMERCIAL LAYER FARMS IN BANDIRMA
    Gunaydin, Elcin
    Cokal, Yavuz
    Goncagul, Gulsen
    FRESENIUS ENVIRONMENTAL BULLETIN, 2021, 30 (7A): : 9438 - 9442
  • [27] Persistence of Campylobacter spp. in Poultry Flocks after Disinfection, Virulence, and Antimicrobial Resistance Traits of Recovered Isolates
    Gharbi, Manel
    Bejaoui, Awatef
    Hamrouni, Safa
    Arfaoui, Amel
    Maaroufi, Abderrazak
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2023, 12 (05):
  • [28] Campylobacter spp. prevalence and fluoroquinolone resistance in chicken layer farms
    Sasaki, Yoshimasa
    Iwata, Taketoshi
    Uema, Masashi
    Yonemitsu, Kenzo
    Igimi, Shizunobu
    Asakura, Hiroshi
    JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 84 (06) : 743 - 746
  • [29] Salmonella spp. and Campylobacter spp. in poultry feces and carcasses in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso
    Kagambega, Asseta
    Thibodeau, Alexandre
    Trinetta, Valentina
    Soro, Daniel K.
    Sama, Florent N.
    Bako, Evariste
    Bouda, Caroline S.
    N'Diaye, Aissata Wereme
    Fravalo, Philippe
    Barro, Nicolas
    FOOD SCIENCE & NUTRITION, 2018, 6 (06): : 1601 - 1606
  • [30] PRESENCE OF CAMPYLOBACTER AND SALMONELLA SPP. IN POULTRY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES FROM FARM TO RETAIL IN HUNGARY
    Tozser, D.
    Szakmar, K.
    Szima, R.
    Erdosi, O.
    Szili, Zs
    Laczay, P.
    ACTA ALIMENTARIA, 2019, 48 (04) : 488 - 494