Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:6
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Dosimetric evaluation of off-axis fields and angular transmission for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    van den Dobbelsteen, M.
    Hackett, S. L.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    van Asselen, B.
    Oolbekkink, S.
    Woodings, S. J.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2022, 67 (20)
  • [12] Measurement of isocenter alignment accuracy and image distortion of an 0.35 T MR-Linac system
    Dorsch, S.
    Mann, P.
    Elter, A.
    Runz, A.
    Spindeldreier, C. K.
    Klueter, S.
    Karger, C. P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2019, 64 (20)
  • [13] Multicentric characterisation of lateral beam profiles generated by 6FFF beam of three 0.35 T MR-linac systems
    Sebastiano, Menna
    Randa, El Gawhary
    Lorenzo, Placidi
    Flaviovincenzo, Quaranta
    Cristian, Borrazzo
    Marica, Masi
    Matteo, Nardini
    Maria, Rago
    Luca, Indovina
    Davide, Cusumano
    Antonella, Fogliata
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 119
  • [14] Performance of a cylindrical diode array for use in a 1.5 T MR-linac
    Houweling, A. C.
    de Vries, J. H. W.
    Wolthaus, J.
    Woodings, S.
    Kok, J. G. M.
    van Asselen, B.
    Smit, K.
    Bel, A.
    Lagendijk, J. J. W.
    Raaymakers, B. W.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2016, 61 (03) : N80 - N89
  • [15] Clinical Implementation of a 0.35T MR-Linac in Spain: Initial Experience and Toxicity Assessment
    Gonsalves, Daniela
    Rincon, Diego
    Ocanto, Abrahams
    Torres, Lisselott
    Montijano, Miguel
    Fernandez, Castalia
    Sevilla, Beatriz
    Amorin, Marina
    Guijarro, Marcos
    Gonzales, Jose A.
    Begara, Jose
    Meilan, Eduardo
    Gomez, Alberto
    Esteban, David
    Romero, Sigfredo
    Dominguez, Jesus
    Sanz, David
    Rodriguez, Julia
    Sanchez, Alicia
    Gongora, Francisco
    Lopez, Escarlata
    Counago, Felipe
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S1967 - S1969
  • [16] Feasibility of using a commercial collapsed cone dose engine for 1.5T MR-LINAC online independent dose verification
    Li, Yongbao
    Wang, Bin
    Ding, Shouliang
    Liu, Hongdong
    Liu, Biaoshui
    Xia, Yunfei
    Song, Ting
    Huang, Xiaoyan
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 80 : 288 - 296
  • [17] On the feasibility of absolute 3D dosimetry using LiF thermoluminescence detectors and polymer gels on a 0.35T MR-LINAC
    Schwahofer, A.
    Mann, P.
    Spindeldreier, C. K.
    Karger, C. P.
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2020, 65 (21)
  • [18] Influence and optimization strategy of the magnetic field in 1.5 T MR-linac liver stereotactic radiotherapy
    Liu, Xin
    Yin, Peijun
    Li, Tengxiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Zhenjiang
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [19] Performance of the HYPERSCINT scintillation dosimetry research platform for the 1.5 T MR-linac
    Uijtewaal, Prescilla
    Cote, Benjamin
    Foppen, Thomas
    de Vries, Wilfred
    Woodings, Simon
    Borman, Pim
    Lambert-Girard, Simon
    Therriault-Proulx, Francois
    Raaymakers, Bas
    Fast, Martin
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2023, 68 (04)
  • [20] Out-of-field dose assessment for a 1.5 T MR-Linac with optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters
    Zhang, Yan
    Yan, Shaojie
    Cui, Zhen
    Wang, Yungang
    Li, Zhenjiang
    Yin, Yong
    Li, Baosheng
    Quan, Hong
    Zhu, Jian
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2021, 48 (07) : 4027 - 4037