Commissioning a secondary dose calculation software for a 0.35 T MR-linac

被引:6
|
作者
Price, Alex T. [1 ]
Knutson, Nels C. [1 ]
Kim, Taeho [1 ]
Green, Olga L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Washington Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiat Oncol, Campus Box 8224,4921 Parkview Pl, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2022年 / 23卷 / 03期
关键词
MRgRT; MRI-guided radiation therapy; quality assurance; secondary dose calculations; THERAPY PHYSICS COMMITTEE; MAGNETIC-FIELD; MEGAVOLTAGE PHOTON; RADIOTHERAPY; ACCELERATOR; AIR; MALIGNANCIES; PERFORMANCE; DOSIMETRY; SCANNER;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.13452
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Secondary external dose calculations for a 0.35 T magnetic resonance image-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) are needed within the radiation oncology community to follow safety standards set forth within the field. We evaluate the commercially available software, RadCalc, in its ability to accurately perform monitor unit dose calculations within a magnetic field. We also evaluate the potential effects of a 0.35 T magnetic field upon point dose calculations. Monitor unit calculations were evaluated with (wMag) and without (noMag) a magnetic field considerations in RadCalc for the ViewRay MRIdian. The magnetic field is indirectly accounted for by using asymmetric profiles for calculation. The introduction of double-stacked multi-leaf collimator leaves was also included in the monitor unit calculations and a single transmission value was determined. A suite of simple and complex geometries with a variety field arrangements were calculated for each method to demonstrate the effect of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit calculations. Finally, 25 patient-specific treatment plans were calculated using each method for comparison. All simple geometries calculated in RadCalc were within 2% of treatment planning system (TPS) values for both methods, except for a single noMag off-axis comparison. All complex muilt-leaf collimator (MLC) pattern calculations were within 5%. All complex phantom geometry calculations were within 5% except for a single field within a lung phantom at a distal point. For the patient calculations, the noMag method average percentage difference was 0.09 +/- 2.5% and the wMag average percentage difference was 0.08 +/- 2.5%. All results were within 5% for the wMag method. We performed monitor unit calculations for a 0.35 T MRgRT system using a commercially available secondary monitor unit dose calculation software and demonstrated minimal impact of the 0.35 T magnetic field on monitor unit dose calculations. This is the first investigation demonstrating successful calculations of dose using RadCalc in the low-field 0.35 T ViewRay MRIdian system.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning
    Chea, Michel
    Croise, Mathilde
    Huet, Christelle
    Bassinet, Celine
    Benadjaoud, Mohamed-Amine
    Jenny, Catherine
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2024, 19 (01)
  • [2] MR compatible detectors assessment for a 0.35 T MR-linac commissioning
    Michel Chea
    Mathilde Croisé
    Christelle Huet
    Céline Bassinet
    Mohamed-Amine Benadjaoud
    Catherine Jenny
    Radiation Oncology, 19
  • [3] Elekta Unity MR-linac commissioning: mechanical and dosimetry tests
    Tsuneda, Masato
    Abe, Kota
    Fujita, Yukio
    Ikeda, Yohei
    Furuyama, Yoshinobu
    Uno, Takashi
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH, 2023, 64 (01) : 73 - 84
  • [4] Electron streaming dose measurements and calculations on a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Patterson, Elizabeth
    Powers, Marcus
    Metcalfe, Peter E.
    Cutajar, Dean
    Oborn, Bradley M.
    Baines, John A.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (07):
  • [5] Optimization of treatment workflow for 0.35T MR-Linac system
    Behzadipour, Mojtaba
    Palta, Jatinder
    Ma, Tianjun
    Yuan, Lulin
    Kim, Siyong
    Kirby, Suzanne
    Torkelson, Laurel
    Baker, James
    Koenig, Tammy
    Khalifa, Mateb Al
    Hawranko, Robert
    Richeson, Dylan
    Fields, Emma
    Weiss, Elisabeth
    Song, William Y.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2024, 25 (08):
  • [6] Out-of-field dose and its constituent components for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Yang, Bin
    Tang, Ka Keung
    Huang, Chen-Yu
    Geng, Hui
    Lam, Wai Wang
    Wong, Yeung Sum
    Tse, Mei Yan
    Lau, Ka Ki
    Cheung, Kin Yin
    Yu, Siu Ki
    PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2021, 66 (22)
  • [7] Dose Calculation Accuracy of Beam Models in RadCalc for a 1.5 T MR-Linac
    Sung, Jiwon
    Choi, Yeonho
    Kim, Jun Won
    Lee, Ho
    CANCERS, 2024, 16 (03)
  • [8] Commissioning measurements on an Elekta Unity MR-Linac
    Powers, Marcus
    Baines, John
    Crane, Robert
    Fisher, Chantelle
    Gibson, Stephen
    Marsh, Linda
    Oar, Bronwyn
    Shoobridge, Ariadne
    Simpson-Page, Emily
    Van der Walt, Marchant
    de Vine, Glenn
    PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES IN MEDICINE, 2022, 45 (02) : 457 - 473
  • [9] Commissioning of a 1.5T Elekta Unity MR-linac: A single institution experience
    Snyder, Jeffrey E.
    St-Aubin, Joel
    Yaddanapudi, Sridhar
    Boczkowski, Amanda
    Dunkerley, David A. P.
    Graves, Stephen A.
    Hyer, Daniel E.
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2020, 21 (07): : 160 - 172
  • [10] MRI commissioning of 1.5T MR-linac systems - a multi-institutional study
    Tijssen, Rob H. N.
    Philippens, Marielle E. P.
    Paulson, Eric S.
    Glitzner, Markus
    Chugh, Brige
    Wetscherek, Andreas
    Dubec, Michael
    Wang, Jihong
    van der Heide, Uulke A.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2019, 132 : 114 - 120