Sociodemographic Disparities in Tobacco Retailer Density in the United States, 2000-2017

被引:17
|
作者
Mills, Sarah D. [1 ,2 ]
Kong, Amanda Y. [1 ,3 ,4 ]
Reimold, Alexandria E. [1 ]
Baggett, Chris D. [2 ,5 ]
Wiesen, Christopher A. [6 ]
Golden, Shelley D. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Behav, 305 Rosenau Hall CB 7440, Chapel Hill, NC 27549 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Lineberger Comprehens Canc Ctr, Chapel Hill, NC 27549 USA
[3] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, Dept Family & Prevent Med, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[4] Univ Oklahoma, Hlth Sci Ctr, TSET Hlth Promot Res Ctr, Stephenson Canc Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[5] Univ N Carolina, Gillings Sch Global Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Chapel Hill, NC 27549 USA
[6] Univ N Carolina, Odum Inst, Chapel Hill, NC 27549 USA
关键词
OUTLET DENSITY; SOCIOECONOMIC-STATUS; SMOKING-CESSATION; HEALTH; ETHNICITY; DEMOGRAPHICS; ASSOCIATION; NATIONWIDE; BEHAVIORS; PROXIMITY;
D O I
10.1093/ntr/ntac020
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Studies find differences in tobacco retailer density according to neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics, raising issues of social justice, but not all research is consistent. Aims and Methods This study examined associations between tobacco retailer density and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics in the United States at four timepoints (2000, 2007, 2012, and 2017) and investigated if associations remained stable over time. Data on tobacco retailers came from the National Establishment Time-Series Database. Adjusted log-linear models examined the relationship between retailer density and census tract sociodemographic characteristics (% non-Hispanic Black [Black], % Hispanic, % vacant housing units, median household income), controlling for percentage of youth, urbanicity, and US region. To examine whether the relationship between density and sociodemographic characteristics changed over time, additional models were estimated with interaction terms between each sociodemographic characteristic and year. Results Tobacco retailer density ranged from 1.22 to 1.44 retailers/1000 persons from 2000 to 2017. There were significant, positive relationships between tobacco retailer density and the percentage of Black (standardized exp(b) = 1.05 [95% CI: 1.04% to 1.07%]) and Hispanic (standardized exp(b) = 1.06 [95% CI: 1.05% to 1.08%]) residents and the percentage of vacant housing units (standardized exp(b) =1.08 [95% CI: 1.07% to 1.10%]) in a census tract. Retailer density was negatively associated with income (standardized exp(b) = 0.84 [95% CI: 0.82% to 0.86%]). From 2000 to 2017, the relationship between retailer density and income and vacant housing units became weaker. Conclusions Despite the weakening of some associations, there are sociodemographic disparities in tobacco retailer density from 2000 to 2017, which research has shown may contribute to inequities in smoking. Implications This study examines associations between tobacco retailer density and neighborhood sociodemographic characteristics in the United States at four timepoints from 2000 to 2017. Although some associations weakened, there are sociodemographic disparities in tobacco retailer density over the study period. Research suggests that sociodemographic disparities in retailer density may contribute to inequities in smoking. Findings from this study may help identify which communities should be prioritized for policy intervention and regulation.
引用
收藏
页码:1291 / 1299
页数:9
相关论文
共 34 条
  • [1] Sociodemographic inequities in tobacco retailer density: Do neighboring places matter?
    Kong, Amanda Y.
    Delamater, Paul L.
    Gottfredson, Nisha C.
    Ribisl, Kurt M.
    Baggett, Chris D.
    Golden, Shelley D.
    HEALTH & PLACE, 2021, 71
  • [2] Reducing Disparities in Tobacco Retailer Density by Banning Tobacco Product Sales Near Schools
    Ribisl, Kurt M.
    Luke, Douglas A.
    Bohannon, Doneisha L.
    Sorg, Amy A.
    Moreland-Russell, Sarah
    NICOTINE & TOBACCO RESEARCH, 2017, 19 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [3] Increasing socioeconomic disparities in tobacco smoking decline among French adolescents (2000-2017)
    Janssen, Eric
    Le Nezet, Olivier
    Shah, Jalpa
    Chyderiotis, Sandra
    Brissot, Alex
    Philippon, Antoine
    Legleye, Stephane
    Spilka, Stanislas
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 42 (04) : E449 - E457
  • [4] Levels, Trends, and Risk Factors for Stillbirths in the United States: 2000-2017
    Wolfson, Carrie
    Qian, Jiage
    Creanga, Andreea A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2024, 41 : e601 - e611
  • [5] Epidemiology of Geographic Disparities of Myocardial Infarction Among Older Adults in the United States: Analysis of 2000-2017 Medicare Data
    Yu, Bin
    Akushevich, Igor
    Yashkin, Arseniy P.
    Kravchenko, Julia
    FRONTIERS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2021, 8
  • [6] Sociodemographic disparities in the management of type 2 diabetes in the United States
    Tan, Xi
    Lee, Lulu K.
    Huynh, Stephanie
    Pawaskar, Manjiri
    Rajpathak, Swapnil
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2020, 36 (06) : 967 - 976
  • [7] Evaluating how licensing-law strategies will impact disparities in tobacco retailer density: a simulation in Ohio
    Craigmile, Peter F.
    Onnen, Nathaniel
    Schwartz, Elli
    Glasser, Allison
    Roberts, Megan E.
    TOBACCO CONTROL, 2021, 30 (E2) : E96 - E103
  • [8] Exposure to Traffic Density during Pregnancy and Birth Weight in a National Cohort, 2000-2017
    Virginia Canto, Marcelle
    Guxens, Monica
    Ramis, Rebeca
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (14)
  • [9] Sociodemographic Factors, Population Density, and Bicycling for Transportation in the United States
    Nehme, Eileen K.
    Perez, Adriana
    Ranjit, Nalini
    Amick, Benjamin C., III
    Kohl, Harold W., III
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY & HEALTH, 2016, 13 (01) : 36 - 43
  • [10] Disparities in Exposure to Pro-Tobacco and anti-Tobacco Advertisements in the United States
    Elkefi, Safa
    Lelutiu-Weinberger, Corina
    Bruzzese, Jean-Marie
    Matthews, Alicia K.
    SUBSTANCE USE & MISUSE, 2025, 60 (02) : 257 - 264