Advancing effects analysis for integrated, large-scale wildfire risk assessment

被引:33
作者
Thompson, Matthew P. [1 ]
Calkin, David E. [1 ]
Gilbertson-Day, Julie W. [2 ]
Ager, Alan A. [3 ]
机构
[1] US Forest Serv, Rocky Mt Res Stn, USDA, Missoula, MT USA
[2] Univ Montana, Coll Forestry & Conservat, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] US Forest Serv, Western Wildland Environm Threat Assessment Ctr, USDA, Prineville, OR USA
关键词
Wildfire risk; Risk assessment; Effects analysis; Expert system; Uncertainty; DECISION-SUPPORT-SYSTEM; FUEL-MANAGEMENT; EXPERT-JUDGMENT; WILDLAND FIRE; UNCERTAINTY; MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; LANDSCAPE; KNOWLEDGE; DANGER;
D O I
10.1007/s10661-010-1731-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this article, we describe the design and development of a quantitative, geospatial risk assessment tool intended to facilitate monitoring trends in wildfire risk over time and to provide information useful in prioritizing fuels treatments and mitigation measures. The research effort is designed to develop, from a strategic view, a first approximation of how both fire likelihood and intensity influence risk to social, economic, and ecological values at regional and national scales. Three main components are required to generate wildfire risk outputs: (1) burn probability maps generated from wildfire simulations, (2) spatially identified highly valued resources (HVRs), and (3) response functions that describe the effects of fire (beneficial or detrimental) on the HVR. Analyzing fire effects has to date presented a major challenge to integrated risk assessments, due to a limited understanding of the type and magnitude of changes wrought by wildfire to ecological and other nonmarket values. This work advances wildfire effects analysis, recognizing knowledge uncertainty and appropriately managing it through the use of an expert systems approach. Specifically, this work entailed consultation with 10 fire and fuels program management officials from federal agencies with fire management responsibilities in order to define quantitative resource response relationships as a function of fire intensity. Here, we demonstrate a proof-of-concept application of the wildland fire risk assessment tool, using the state of Oregon as a case study.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 239
页数:23
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
AGER AA, 2010, NATURAL HAZ IN PRESS
[2]   Modeling wildfire risk to northern spotted owl (Strix occidentalis caurina) habitat in Central Oregon, USA [J].
Ager, Alan A. ;
Finney, Mark A. ;
Kerns, Becky K. ;
Maffei, Helen .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 246 (01) :45-56
[3]   A comparison of landscape fuel treatment strategies to mitigate wildland fire risk in the urban interface and preserve old forest structure [J].
Ager, Alan A. ;
Valliant, Nicole M. ;
Finney, Mark A. .
FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2010, 259 (08) :1556-1570
[4]  
Alho JM, 1997, FOREST SCI, V43, P521
[5]   Forest landowner decisions and the value of information under fire risk [J].
Amacher, GS ;
Malik, AS ;
Haight, RG .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FOREST RESEARCH, 2005, 35 (11) :2603-2615
[6]  
ANDREWS P, 2007, SCI AM AUG, P47
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Federal Register
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1096 OR STAT U AGR E
[9]   Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making [J].
Ascough, J. C., II ;
Maier, H. R. ;
Ravalico, J. K. ;
Strudley, M. W. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 219 (3-4) :383-399
[10]  
Bailey R.G., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the United States (map), supplementary table of map unit descriptions