共 50 条
Cost of early-stage mycosis fungoides treatments in Spain
被引:2
|作者:
Luis Ortiz-Romero, Pablo
[1
]
Servitje, Octavio
[2
]
Teresa Estrach, Maria
[3
]
Maria Izu-Belloso, Rosa
[4
]
Fernandez-de-Misa, Ricardo
[5
,6
]
Gallardo, Fernando
[7
]
Lopez-Martinez, Noemi
[8
]
Perez-Mitru, Alejandro
[8
]
机构:
[1] Univ Complutense, Med Sch, Dermatol Dept, Inst I 12,Hosp 12 Octubre,CIBERONC, Madrid, Spain
[2] Hosp Univ Bellvitge, Dermatol Dept, IDIBELL, Barcelona, Spain
[3] Univ Barcelona, Hosp Clin, Dermatol Dept, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
[4] Hosp Basurto, Dermatol Dept, Bilbao, Spain
[5] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora de Candelaria, Dept Dermatol, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[6] Hosp Univ Nuestra Senora de Candelaria, Res Unit, Santa Cruz De Tenerife, Spain
[7] Parc Salut Mar Hosp del Mar, Dermatol Dept, Barcelona, Spain
[8] Oblikue Consulting, C Comte Urgell,240,2-D, Barcelona 08036, Spain
来源:
CLINICOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH
|
2020年
/
12卷
关键词:
health care costs;
health resources;
mycosis fungoides;
lymphoma;
T-cell;
cutaneous;
surveys and questionnaires;
Spain;
T-CELL LYMPHOMA;
SKIN ELECTRON-BEAM;
PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS;
SEZARY-SYNDROME;
EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION;
INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY;
BEXAROTENE THERAPY;
INTERFERON-ALPHA;
TASK-FORCE;
PUVA;
D O I:
10.2147/CEOR.S233376
中图分类号:
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号:
摘要:
Aim: To identify the most common therapeutic options for the treatment of early-stage mycosis fungoides in Spain, quantify their associated healthcare resource use and costs. Methods: After reviewing the literature, a panel of 6 Spanish clinical dermatologists validated the treatments and healthcare resource use through a structured questionnaire. Individual responses were collected, analyzed and presented into a face-to-face meeting in order to reach a consensus. Cost categories considered were: drug acquisition and administration, photo/radiotherapy session and maintenance, clinical follow-up visits and laboratory tests. Costs were expressed in euros from 2018. The Spanish National Health System perspective was considered, taking into account direct health costs and time horizons of 1, 3 and 6 months. Results: Costs for the skin-directed treatments (SDT) assessed at 1, 3 and 6 months, were: Topical carmustine [(sic)6,593.36, (sic)19,780.09 and (sic)27,592.78]; Phototherapy with psoralens and ultraviolet A light (PUVA) [(sic)1,098.68, (sic)2,999.99 and (sic)3,187.60]; Narrow-band ultraviolet B phototherapy [(sic)1,657.47, (sic)4,842.10 and (sic)4,842.10]; Total skin electron beam therapy (TSEBT) [(sic)6,796.45, (sic)7,913.34 and (sic)7,913.34]. Cost for topical corticosteroids, being considered an adjuvant option, were (sic)17.16, (sic)51.49 and (sic)102.97. Costs for the assessed systemic treatments alone or in combination with SDT at 1, 3 and 6 months, were: Systemic retinoids [(sic)2,026.03, (sic)5,206.63 and (sic)7,426.42]; Systemic retinoids + PUVA phototherapy [(sic)3,066.50, (sic)8,271.26 and (sic)10,046.58]; Interferon alfa + PUVA phototherapy [(sic)1,541.09, (sic)5,167.57 and (sic)6,404.55]. Conclusion: According to the Spanish clinical practice, phototherapies in monotherapy were the treatments with the lowest associated costs regardless of the time horizon considered. TSEBT turned out as the treatment with the highest associated costs when considering 1 month. However, while considering 3 and 6 months the treatment with the highest associated costs was topical carmustine. The results of this analysis may provide critical information to measure the disease burden, to detect unmet medical needs and to advocate towards better treatments for this rare disease.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 105
页数:15
相关论文