Comparative study of human eutopic and ectopic endometrial mesenchymal stem cells and the development of an in vivo endometriotic invasion model

被引:134
作者
Kao, An-Pei [1 ]
Wang, Kai-Hung [1 ]
Chang, Chia-Cheng [2 ]
Lee, Jau-Nan [3 ]
Long, Cheng-Yu [4 ]
Chen, Hung-Sheng [3 ]
Tsai, Cheng-Fang [1 ]
Hsieh, Tsung-Hua [1 ]
Tsai, Eing-Mei [1 ,3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Grad Inst Med, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Pediat & Human Dev, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaohsiung Med Univ Hosp, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
[4] Kaohsiung Municipal Hsiaokang Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
[5] Kaohsiung Med Univ, Ctr Excellence Environm Med, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
关键词
Endometriosis; mesenchymal stem cells; invasion; animal model; ADIPOSE-TISSUE; RISK; PATHOGENESIS; VITRO; IDENTIFICATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.09.064
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To elucidate the role of endometrial stem-progenitor cells in the etiology of endometriosis and to develop an animal model to study the invasion ability of endometrial cells. Design: Gene expression and cell function studies were designed. Setting: Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. Patient(s): Human endometrial mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were isolated from 22 different endometrium biopsies after surgery for treatment of endometriosis. Intervention(s): Endometrial MSCs developed from eutopic and ectopic endometrial tissues. Main Outcome Measure(s): Characterization of MSC phenotypes (i.e., differentiation induction and gene expression by flow cytometric analysis); comparative study of cell functions (i.e., cell growth, migration, and invasion assays). The invasion of implants in an animal model was examined by histologic staining. Result(s): We compared the characteristics of eutopic and ectopic endometrial MSCs from the same endometrial donor. Although both showed similar mesenchymal cell phenotypes, ectopic endometrial MSCs showed distinctly greater ability of cell migration and invasion. Furthermore, in an in vivo cell invasion model using cells grown in scaffold and transplantation in immune-deficient mice, the ectopic endometrial MSCs were found to form many new blood vessels and to invade surrounding tissue. Conclusion(s): These results indicate unique invasion and angiogenesis characteristics of ectopic endometrial MSCs that may underlie the pathogenesis of ectopic endometriosis. The animal invasion model will be useful for future characterization of endometrial MSCs. (Fertil Steril (R) 2011;95:1308-15. (C) 2011 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.)
引用
收藏
页码:1308 / U139
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   The link between environmental toxicant exposure and endometriosis [J].
Anger, Dana L. ;
Foster, Warren G. .
FRONTIERS IN BIOSCIENCE-LANDMARK, 2008, 13 :1578-1593
[2]  
Baldi A, 2008, ONCOL REP, V19, P843
[3]   Endometriosis and the outcome of in vitro fertilization [J].
Brosens, I .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2004, 81 (05) :1198-1200
[4]   Clonogenicity of human endometrial epithelial and stromal cellss [J].
Chan, RWS ;
Schwab, KE ;
Gargett, CE .
BIOLOGY OF REPRODUCTION, 2004, 70 (06) :1738-1750
[5]  
CHANG CC, 1981, SOMAT CELL GENET, V7, P235
[6]   FORMATION OF CARTILAGE-LIKE SPHEROIDS BY MICROMASS CULTURES OF MURINE C3H10T1/2 CELLS UPON TREATMENT WITH TRANSFORMING GROWTH-FACTOR-BETA-1 [J].
DENKER, AE ;
NICOLL, SB ;
TUAN, RS .
DIFFERENTIATION, 1995, 59 (01) :25-34
[7]   SCRAPE-LOADING AND DYE TRANSFER - A RAPID AND SIMPLE TECHNIQUE TO STUDY GAP JUNCTIONAL INTERCELLULAR COMMUNICATION [J].
ELFOULY, MH ;
TROSKO, JE ;
CHANG, CC .
EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH, 1987, 168 (02) :422-430
[8]   SECONDARY MULLERIAN SYSTEM AND ENDOMETRIOSIS [J].
FUJII, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1991, 165 (01) :219-225
[9]   Uterine stem cells: What is the evidence? [J].
Gargett, C. E. .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2007, 13 (01) :87-101
[10]   Identification and characterisation of human endometrial stem/progenitor cells [J].
Gargett, CE .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2006, 46 (03) :250-253