Transient thermodynamic modeling of an underwater compressed air energy storage plant: Conventional versus advanced exergy analysis

被引:39
作者
Carriveau, Rupp [1 ]
Ebrahimi, Mehdi [1 ]
Ting, David S. -K. [1 ]
McGillis, Andrew [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Windsor, Turbulence & Energy Lab, 401 Sunset Ave, Windsor, ON, Canada
[2] Hydrostor Inc, 300-365 Bay St, Toronto, ON M5H 2V1, Canada
关键词
Transient exergy analysis; Exergy destruction components; Underwater energy storage; EXERGOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; CAES;
D O I
10.1016/j.seta.2018.12.003
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Exergy analysis has been applied in various engineering fields. Most of these analyses have been conducted under steady-state conditions. This can be of limited use when the operation under consideration is highly transient. Such is the case for energy storage systems connected to a dynamic grid. In this work, a transient exergy analysis has been performed for the first known grid connected Underwater Compressed Air Energy Storage facility. Both conventional and advanced exergy analyses were applied. The conventional exergy analysis showed that at plant start up, the compressors have the highest exergy destruction ratio. Under real and unavoidable operational conditions, they alone are responsible for 40% and 35% of exergy destruction of the system. Under the steady-state condition, however, heat exchangers have the dominant effect with 29% and 31% exergy destruction ratios under real and unavoidable operating conditions, respectively. The advanced exergy analysis also revealed that at start up, about 82% of the exergy destruction is avoidable. By the beginning of the steady-state phase, this decreases to 75%, indicating the significant potential of the system for performance improvement. The transient exergetic analysis documented herein has wide applicability for design optimization of a variety of thermodynamic processes.
引用
收藏
页码:146 / 154
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Advanced exergoeconomic analysis of an electricity-generating facility that operates with natural gas [J].
Acikkalp, Emin ;
Aras, Haydar ;
Hepbasli, Arif .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 78 :452-460
[2]   Steady versus dynamic exergy analysis: the case of an air source heat pump [J].
Angelotti, Adriana ;
Caputo, Paola ;
Solaini, Giulio .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXERGY, 2012, 11 (04) :460-472
[3]   Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of a Compressed Air Energy Storage combined with a district energy system [J].
Bagdanavicius, Audrius ;
Jenkins, Nick .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2014, 77 :432-440
[4]   Exergy analysis for unsteady-state heat conduction [J].
Choi, Wonjun ;
Ooka, Ryozo ;
Shukuya, Masanori .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 2018, 116 :1124-1142
[5]   Evaluation and optimization of a multi-effect evaporation-absorption heat pump desalination based conventional and advanced exergy and exergoeconomic analyses [J].
Esfahani, Iman Janghorban ;
Lee, SeungChul ;
Yoo, ChangKyoo .
DESALINATION, 2015, 359 :92-107
[6]   Advanced exergy analysis for an anode gas recirculation solid oxide fuel cell [J].
Fallah, M. ;
Mahmoudi, S. M. S. ;
Yari, M. .
ENERGY, 2017, 141 :1097-1112
[7]   Advanced exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle applied for low temperature enhanced geothermal system [J].
Fallah, M. ;
Mohammad, S. ;
Mahmoudi, S. ;
Yari, M. ;
Ghiasi, R. Akbarpour .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 108 :190-201
[8]   Thermodynamic analysis of a hybrid energy storage system based on compressed air and liquid air [J].
Kantharaj, Bharath ;
Garvey, Seamus ;
Pimm, Andrew .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2015, 11 :159-164
[9]   Advanced exergetic analysis: Approaches for splitting the exergy destruction into endogenous and exogenous parts [J].
Kelly, S. ;
Tsatsaronis, G. ;
Morosuk, T. .
ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) :384-391
[10]   Analysis of the energy storage technology using Hype Cycle approach [J].
Khodayari, Maryam ;
Aslani, Alireza .
SUSTAINABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES AND ASSESSMENTS, 2018, 25 :60-74