Differences between Creativity and Gender in Students with High Abilities Attending a School with Total Grouping

被引:6
作者
Betancourt, Julian [1 ]
de los Dolores Valadez, Maria [2 ]
Rodriguez-Naveiras, Elena [3 ]
Francisco Flores, Juan [2 ]
Borges, Africa [3 ]
机构
[1] Jalisco Educ Secretary, Jalisco Educ Ctr High Abil, Guadalajara 44100, Jalisco, Mexico
[2] Univ Guadalajara, Univ Ctr Hlth Sci, Inst Psychol & Special Educ, Dept Appl Psychol, Guadalajara 44340, Jalisco, Mexico
[3] Univ La Laguna, Dept Clin Psychol Psychobiol & Methodol, San Cristobal De La Lagu 38200, Spain
来源
CHILDREN-BASEL | 2022年 / 9卷 / 07期
关键词
high ability; creativity; training;
D O I
10.3390/children9071081
中图分类号
R72 [儿科学];
学科分类号
100202 ;
摘要
Background: Creativity is one of the most relevant aspects in students' training. One of the purposes of the present work is to show the lack of differences between boys and girls in creativity; the other is the possibility of improving creativity among high-ability students who received specific training as part of their intra-curricular content in a total grouping program for gifted students. Method: The sample consisted of 42 students from first to third grade (13 females and 29 males) and 58 students from fourth to sixth grade (21 females and 37 males). Creativity was measured with the CREA test for younger students and with the PIC-N for older students. Training was carried out through an Integral Innovation and Creativity Program (PIIC). Results: The results showed no differences between genders, except in one of the graphic creativity scales (Details). There were improvements due to the training in all measures of narrative creativity and in the scale of elaboration of graphic creativity. Conclusions: The main conclusions are the importance of increasing creativity with specific programs and the need to improve interventions in graphic creativity.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ALLAN SD, 1991, EDUC LEADERSHIP, V48, P60
[2]  
Alvarado R., 2018, TSANTSA REV INVESTIG, V6, P35
[3]  
Arancibia V., 2016, Universal Journal of Educational Research, V4, P744, DOI [10.13189/ujer.2016.040411, DOI 10.13189/UJER.2016.040411]
[4]  
Artola T., 2003, PRUEBA IMAGINACI N C
[5]  
Bolick N., 2016, Journal of Education and Human Development, V5, DOI [DOI 10.15640/JEHD.V5N2A6, 10.15640/jehd.v5n2a6]
[6]  
Borland J.H., 2003, Handbook of gifted education, P293
[7]  
Campos G., 2018, CREAT SOC, V27, P168
[8]  
García-Cepero MC, 2012, UNIV PSYCHOL, V11, P1327
[9]  
Chen C. W. J., 2019, J STEM ED RES, V2, P75, DOI [10.1007/s41979-018-0010-6, DOI 10.1007/S41979-018-0010-6]
[10]   Nurturing Creativity in Education [J].
Collard, Paul ;
Looney, Janet .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, 2014, 49 (03) :348-364