Phenotypic analysis of familial breast cancer: Comparison of BRCAx tumors with BRCA1-, BRCA2-carriers and non-familial breast cancer

被引:10
作者
Aloraifi, F. [1 ,2 ]
Alshehhi, M. [3 ]
McDevitt, T. [3 ]
Cody, N. [3 ]
Meany, M. [3 ]
O'Doherty, A. [1 ,4 ]
Quinn, C. M. [1 ,4 ]
Green, A. J. [1 ,3 ]
Bracken, A. [2 ]
Geraghty, J. G. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Sch Med & Med Sci, Dublin 2, Ireland
[2] Univ Dublin Trinity Coll, Smurfit Inst Genet, Dublin 2, Ireland
[3] Natl Ctr Med Genet, Dublin, Ireland
[4] St Vincent Univ Hosp, Dublin, Ireland
来源
EJSO | 2015年 / 41卷 / 05期
关键词
Breast cancer; BRCA1; gene; BRCA2; Selective estrogen receptor modulators; Genetics; Chemoprevention; SURGICAL ADJUVANT BREAST; HISTOPATHOLOGICAL FEATURES; ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR; MUTATION CARRIERS; PREVENTION; PATHOLOGY; WOMEN; GENE; MASTECTOMY; TAMOXIFEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejso.2015.01.021
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aims: Women with inherited pathogenic mutations in the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes have up to an 85% risk of developing breast cancer in their lifetime. However, only about 20% of familial breast cancer is attributed to mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2, while a further 5-10% are attributed to mutations in other rare susceptibility genes such as TP53, STK11, PTEN, ATM and CHEK2. Despite extensive efforts to explain the missing heritability of this disease, the majority of familial clustering in breast cancer remains largely unexplained. We aim to analyze the pathology of familial cases of which no pathogenic mutation is yet identified. Methods: We compared the pathological phenotype of BRCA1/BRCA2 negative familial breast cancer (BRCAx) to BRCAl-positive, BRCA2-positive and sporadic cases without a family history. Age-adjusted analysis is summarized in odd's ratios and confidence intervals for tumor type, grade, lymph node, ER and HER2 status. Results: We found non-familial cases to be more likely to be ER positive (P = 0.041) as compared with BRCAx tumors. More cases of lobular carcinoma were found with BRCAx as compared to BRCA1 tumors (P = 0.05). After multivariate logistic regression analysis, BRCAx tumors are more likely ER positive (P = 0.001) and HER2 positive (P = 0.047) in comparison to BRCA1 Conversely, BRCAx cases are less likely to be ER positive (P = 0.02) but more likely to be HER2 positive (P = 0.021) as compared with BRCA2 tumors. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that BRCA1, BRCA2 and BRCAx tumors differ in phenotype from non-familial and familial BRCA1-positive and BRCA2-positive tumors. Further studies will need to be performed in this important population in order to develop strategies for early detection and prevention. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:641 / 646
页数:6
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Familial Concordance of Breast Cancer Pathology as an Indicator of Genotype in Multiple-Case Families [J].
Balleine, Rosemary L. ;
Provan, Pamela J. ;
Pupo, Gulietta M. ;
Pathmanathan, Nirmala ;
Cummings, Margaret ;
Farshid, Gelareh ;
Salisbury, Elizabeth L. ;
Bilous, A. Michael ;
Byth, Karen ;
Mann, Graham J. .
GENES CHROMOSOMES & CANCER, 2010, 49 (12) :1082-1094
[2]   Expression profiling of familial breast cancers demonstrates higher expression of FGFR2 in BRCA2-associated tumors [J].
Bane, Anita L. ;
Pinnaduwage, Dushanthi ;
Colby, Sarah ;
Bull, Shelley B. ;
O'Malley, Frances P. ;
Andrulis, Irene L. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2009, 117 (01) :183-191
[3]   ATM-heterozygous germline mutations contribute to breast cancer-susceptibility [J].
Broeks, A ;
Urbanus, JHM ;
Floore, AN ;
Dahler, EC ;
Klijn, JGM ;
Rutgers, EJT ;
Devilee, P ;
Russell, NS ;
van Leeuwen, FE ;
van't Veer, LJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2000, 66 (02) :494-500
[4]   Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials [J].
Cuzick, J ;
Powles, T ;
Veronesi, U ;
Forbes, J ;
Edwards, R ;
Ashley, S ;
Boyle, P .
LANCET, 2003, 361 (9354) :296-300
[5]   Selective oestrogen receptor modulators in prevention of breast cancer: an updated meta-analysis of individual participant data [J].
Cuzick, Jack ;
Sestak, Ivana ;
Bonanni, Bernardo ;
Costantino, Joseph P. ;
Cummings, Steve ;
DeCensi, Andrea ;
Dowsett, Mitch ;
Forbes, John F. ;
Ford, Leslie ;
LaCroix, Andrea Z. ;
Mershon, John ;
Mitlak, Bruce H. ;
Powles, Trevor ;
Veronesi, Umberto ;
Vogel, Victor ;
Wickerham, D. Lawrence .
LANCET, 2013, 381 (9880) :1827-1834
[6]   Pathology of hereditary breast cancer [J].
Da Silva, Leonard ;
Lakhani, Sunil R. .
MODERN PATHOLOGY, 2010, 23 :S46-S51
[7]   Mortality after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers:: a prospective cohort study [J].
Domchek, SM ;
Friebel, TM ;
Neuhausen, SL ;
Wagner, T ;
Evans, G ;
Isaacs, C ;
Garber, JE ;
Daly, M ;
Eeles, R ;
Matloff, E ;
Tomlinson, GE ;
Van't Veer, L ;
Lynch, HT ;
Olopade, O ;
Weber, BL ;
Rebbeck, TR .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2006, 7 (03) :223-229
[8]   Familial non-BRCA1/BRCA2-associated breast cancer [J].
Eccles, DM ;
Pichert, G .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) :705-711
[9]   Histopathological features of breast tumours in BRCA1, BRCA2 and mutation-negative breast cancer families [J].
Eerola, H ;
Heikkilä, P ;
Tamminen, A ;
Aittomäki, K ;
Blomqvist, C ;
Nevanlinna, H .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2005, 7 (01) :R93-R100
[10]   Penetrance estimates for BRCA1 and BRCA2 based on genetic testing in a Clinical Cancer Genetics service setting:: Risks of breast/ovarian cancer quoted should reflect the cancer burden in the family [J].
Evans, D. Gareth ;
Shenton, Andrew ;
Woodward, Emma ;
Lalloo, Fiona ;
Howell, Anthony ;
Maher, Eamonn R. .
BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)