Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain

被引:46
作者
Gross, DP
Battié, MC
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Dept Phys Therapy, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
[2] Millard Hlth, Workers Compensat Board Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
关键词
predictive validity; functional capacity evaluation; return-to-work; recurrence; performance-based; compensation; survival analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s10926-005-5937-7
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objectives: Functional Capacity Evaluation (FCE) is used to determine return-to-work readiness. We investigated the ability of the Isernhagen Work Systems' FCE to predict sustained return-to-work and future pain and disability in workers' compensation claimants with chronic back pain. Methods: Prospective study of 130 claimants undergoing FCE for chronic back problems. FCE indicators included number of failed tasks and floor-to-waist lift weight. Recovery indicators included days to suspension of time-loss benefits and future recurrence. Subjects were contacted after one year to determine pain intensity and disability. Analysis included Cox and logistic regression. Results: Fewer failed tasks (HRR 0.94 (0.91-0.98) and higher floor-to-waist lift (HRR 1.38 (1.17-1.62) were associated with faster return-to-work. FCE was not associated with future recurrence, or reported pain intensity, or disability in subjects reached for follow-up. Conclusions: Better FCE performance was mildly associated with indicators of faster return-to-work. However, FCE is not related to recurrent back problems, future pain intensity, or self-reported disability.
引用
收藏
页码:285 / 294
页数:10
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]   Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain [J].
Geisser, ME ;
Robinson, ME ;
Miller, QL ;
Bade, SM .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 13 (04) :259-276
[12]  
GIBSON L, 1998, BRIT J OCCUPATIONAL, V61, P399
[13]   Factors influencing results of functional capacity evaluations in workers' compensation claimants with low back pain [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2005, 85 (04) :315-322
[14]   The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain:: Part 1 -: Timely return to work [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC ;
Cassidy, JD .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (08) :914-919
[15]   The prognostic value of functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain:: part 2 -: Sustained recovery [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC .
SPINE, 2004, 29 (08) :920-924
[16]   Construct validity of a kinesiophysical functional capacity evaluation administered within a worker's compensation environment [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2003, 13 (04) :287-295
[17]   Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation [J].
Gross, DP ;
Battié, MC .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2002, 82 (04) :364-371
[18]   GUIDELINES FOR FUNCTIONAL-CAPACITY EVALUATION OF PEOPLE WITH MEDICAL CONDITIONS [J].
HART, DL ;
ISERNHAGEN, SJ ;
MATHESON, LN .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC & SPORTS PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1993, 18 (06) :682-686
[19]  
Hosmer D. W., 1999, APPL SURVIVAL ANAL R
[20]  
Hosmer W., 2000, Applied Logistic Regression, VSecond