The risk of cystocele after sacrospinous ligament fixation

被引:42
作者
Smilen, SW [1 ]
Saini, J [1 ]
Wallach, SJ [1 ]
Porges, RF [1 ]
机构
[1] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Sch Med,Div Urogynecol Reconstruct Pelv Surg, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
pelvic organ prolapse; recurrent cystocele; sacrospinous ligament fixation;
D O I
10.1016/S0002-9378(98)70041-9
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether sacrospinous ligament fixation independently increases the risk of anterior Vaginal wall defect. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgical operations by a single surgeon from 1970 through 1997. Two groups were examined and divided into subgroups to evaluate the effects of exposure to sacrospinous ligament fixation: patients with anterior wall defects undergoing standard anterior colporrhaphy with (group 1A) or without (group 1B) concomitant sacrospinous ligament fixation, and patients without anterior wall defects undergoing other pelvic reconstructive procedures (but not anterior colporrhaphy) with (group 2A) or without (group 28) sacrospinous ligament fixation. Recurrence rates were calculated for each group according to evidence of any degree of anatomic defect. RESULTS: Among 322 patients in group 1, 9 of 77 in group 1A and 23 of 245 in group 1B (11.7% vs 9.4%, P >.05) had anterior wall recurrences. Among 73 patients in group 2, 8 of 45 in group 2A and 5 of 28 in group 2B (17.8% vs 17.9%, P >.05) had subsequent anterior wall defects. CONCLUSION: The occurrence of anterior vaginal wail defects was not found to be altered by the performance of sacrospinous ligament fixation. These findings may be attributable to surgical technique emphasizing maintenance of anterior vaginal wall length during sacrospinous ligament fixation.
引用
收藏
页码:1465 / 1471
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BACKER MH, 1992, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V175, P419
[2]  
Bonney V, 1934, J OBSTET GYNECOL BR, V41, P669, DOI [10.1111/j.1471-0528.1934.tb08799.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1471-0528.1934.TB08799.X]
[3]   Randomized prospective comparison of needle colposuspension versus endopelvic fascia plication for potential stress incontinence prophylaxis in women undergoing vaginal reconstruction for stage III or IV pelvic organ prolapse [J].
Bump, RC ;
Hurt, WG ;
Theofrastous, JP ;
Addison, WA ;
Fantl, JA ;
Wyman, JF ;
McClish, DK .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (02) :326-333
[4]   TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY FOR VAULT AND MARKED UTEROVAGINAL PROLAPSE [J].
CAREY, MP ;
SLACK, MC .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1994, 101 (06) :536-540
[5]   ANATOMIC ASPECTS OF VAGINAL EVERSION AFTER HYSTERECTOMY [J].
DELANCEY, JOL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1992, 166 (06) :1717-1728
[6]   TRANSVAGINAL SACROSPINOUS COLPOPEXY FOR VAGINAL VAULT AND COMPLETE GENITAL PROLAPSE IN AGED WOMEN [J].
HEINONEN, PK .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1992, 71 (05) :377-381
[7]  
HOLLEY RL, 1995, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V180, P444
[8]   Incidence of recurrent cystocele after anterior colporrhaphy with and without concomitant transvaginal needle suspension [J].
Kohli, N ;
Sze, EHM ;
Roat, TW ;
Karram, MM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 175 (06) :1476-1480
[10]  
Miller N, 1927, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, P550