Reporting Adverse Drug Reactions in Product Labels

被引:10
作者
Crowe, Brenda [1 ]
Chuang-Stein, Christy [2 ]
Lettis, Sally [3 ]
Brueckner, Andreas [4 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, Global Stat Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
[2] Chuang Stein Consulting LLC, Kalamazoo, MI USA
[3] GlaxoSmithKline, Clin Stat, Uxbridge, Middx, England
[4] Novartis, Quantitat Safety & Epidemiol, Basel, Switzerland
关键词
product label; product safety; harms; adverse drug reactions; adverse events; REGRESSION-MODELS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; MISSING DATA; PREVENTION;
D O I
10.1177/2168479016628574
中图分类号
R-058 [];
学科分类号
摘要
Product labels are intended to provide health care professionals with clear and concise prescribing information that will enhance the safe and effective use of drug products. In this manuscript, we offer suggestions to improve product labels. First, we recommend that product labels that include comparator data be changed to include adjusted incidence proportions (or adjusted incidence rates when needed and appropriate) for adverse drug reactions that are somewhat common. Second, we believe that including comparator incidence in product labels is a good practice, as it gives health care providers and patients appropriate information to put the absolute risks in perspective. Finally, we recommend changing the practice of reporting extremely rare events based on the Rule of 3 in the Summary of Product Characteristics in Europe. We recommend that these adverse drug reactions be put in a separate table from other adverse drug reactions with a note that it is difficult to reliably estimate their incidences. In exceptional circumstances, it may be possible to present an estimate of their incidence based on postmarketing data. We believe the proposed changes could help product labels to better reflect the risk of a drug relative to a comparator.
引用
收藏
页码:455 / 463
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], PULM ALL DRUGS ADV C
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2010, CAMBRIDGE DICT STAT
  • [3] Over the counter medicines and the need for immediate action: a further evaluation of European Commission recommended wordings for communicating risk
    Berry, D
    Raynor, T
    Knapp, P
    Bersellini, E
    [J]. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING, 2004, 53 (02) : 129 - 134
  • [4] Provision of information about drug side-effects to patients
    Berry, DC
    Knapp, P
    Raynor, DK
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9309) : 853 - 854
  • [5] Reporting cumulative proportion of subjects with an adverse event based on data from multiple studies
    Chuang-Stein, Christy
    Beltangady, Mohan
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2011, 10 (01) : 3 - 7
  • [6] CIOMS Working Groups III and V, 1999, GUID PREP COR CLIN S
  • [7] Current Practices, Challenges, and Statistical Issues With Product Safety Labeling
    Crowe, Brenda
    Brueckner, Andreas
    Beasley, Charles
    Kulkarni, Pandurang
    [J]. STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2013, 5 (03): : 180 - 193
  • [8] Individual patient data meta-analysis of survival data using Poisson regression models
    Crowther, Michael J.
    Riley, Richard D.
    Staessen, Jan A.
    Wang, Jiguang
    Gueyffier, Francois
    Lambert, Paul C.
    [J]. BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2012, 12
  • [9] European Commission, 2009, A Guideline on Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC)
  • [10] Events per person-time (incidence rate): A misleading statistic?
    Kraemer, Helena Chmura
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2009, 28 (06) : 1028 - 1039