Estimation and forecasting of soybean yield using artificial neural networks

被引:5
作者
Barbosa dos Santos, Valter [1 ]
dos Santos, Aline Moreno Ferreira [1 ]
Rolim, Glauco de Souza [1 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ Unesp, Dept Rural Engn & Exact Sci, Sch Agr & Vet Sci, Via Acesso Prof Paulo Donato Castellane, BR-14884900 Sao Paulo, Brazil
关键词
CROP; MODEL; TEMPERATURE; IMPACT; WATER;
D O I
10.1002/agj2.20729
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
In science, estimation is the calculation of a current value, while forecasting (or prediction) is the calculation of a future value. Both estimation and forecasting are based on covariates. However, whereas estimation enables greater agility in current decision making, forecasting can reveal different strategies for the future. The use of Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) has brought improvements in accuracy to the estimation and forecasting of agricultural yield for various crops around the world. These models are part of a set of machine-learning models, becoming an important ally not only to producers, companies, cooperatives, and to government institutions for decisions making and strategic decisions at all levels of the agricultural system. The main constraints of agricultural production are climatic conditions and soil water availability during crop cycles. We propose the use of ANNs for soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] yield estimation and forecasting 2 mo before harvesting in the region of MATOPIBA, the largest and the last agricultural frontier of Brazil. This tropical agricultural area has about 73,173,485 hectares, corresponding to approximately 1.3 times the area of France. The input features for ANN were the monthly climatic conditions of air temperature, precipitation, and global radiation, as well as components of the water balance such as crop evapotranspiration, soil water storage, actual evapotranspiration, water deficiency, and surpluses during the cultivation cycle. The evaluation of ANN for yield estimation had R-2 = .88 and RMSE = 167.85 kg ha(-1), while the ANN for forecasting obtained R-2 = .86 and RMSE = 185.85 kg ha(-1).
引用
收藏
页码:3193 / 3209
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Allen R. G., 1998, FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper
[2]   Estimating soybean yields with artificial neural networks [J].
Alves, Guiliano Rangel ;
Teixeira, Itamar Rosa ;
Melo, Francisco Ramos ;
Guimaraes Souza, Raniele Tadeu ;
Silva, Alessandro Guerra .
ACTA SCIENTIARUM-AGRONOMY, 2018, 40
[3]  
Anochi, 2016, AM J ENV ENG, V6, P94, DOI [10.5923/s.ajee.201601.14, DOI 10.5923/S.AJEE.201601.14]
[4]   Impact of meteorological drivers on regional inter-annual crop yield variability in France [J].
Ceglar, Andrej ;
Toreti, Andrea ;
Lecerf, Remi ;
Van der Velde, Marijn ;
Dentener, Frank .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 2016, 216 :58-67
[5]   Phenology and Seed Yield Performance of Determinate Soybean Cultivars Grown at Elevated Temperatures in a Temperate Region [J].
Choi, Doug-Hwan ;
Ban, Ho-Young ;
Seo, Beom-Seok ;
Lee, Kyu-Jong ;
Lee, Byun-Woo .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (11)
[6]  
Companhia Nacional De Abastecimento (CONAB), 2019, GRAIN PLANT HARV CAL
[7]  
CONAB, 2020, COMP NAC AB
[8]   Agrometeorological Models for Forecasting Coffee Yield [J].
de Oliveira Aparecido, Lucas Eduardo ;
Rolim, Glauco de Souza ;
Camargo Lamparelli, Rubens Augusto ;
de Souza, Paulo Sergio ;
dos Santos, Eder Ribeiro .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2017, 109 (01) :249-258
[9]  
Dutra L.F., 1995, CURRENT AGR SCI TECH, V1, DOI 10.18539/cast.v1i2.125
[10]  
Evangelista B.A., 2017, CLIM RISK ZON DET SO