Capability assessments - How to make them useful for decision-making

被引:6
作者
Lindbom, Hanna [1 ]
Hassel, Henrik [1 ]
Tehler, Henrik [1 ]
Uhr, Christian [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Div Risk Management & Soc Safety, POB 118, S-22100 Lund, Sweden
[2] Swedish Civil Contingencies Agcy, Karlstad, Sweden
关键词
Capability assessment; Tasks; Resources; Decision-making; Perceived usefulness; Disaster risk management (DRM); RISK-ASSESSMENT; COMMUNICATION; VULNERABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; DEFINE; SWEDEN; TRENDS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.05.009
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Capability assessments are becoming increasingly common as part of risk management activities worldwide. Despite this, there is no consensus concerning how these assessments are best conducted and presented. Recent studies suggest that two factors may influence the usefulness of capability assessments for decision-making: namely, whether the assessment includes descriptions of the resources available to an actor, and how well this actor can accomplish specific tasks. The present study was carried out to investigate the importance of including information on these factors in capability assessments. The experimental study conducted involved four fictive versions of capability assessments, differing in whether they included information about resources and tasks. Over 200 risk management professionals rated how useful they perceived each version to be as the basis for decision-making. The results show that it is important to include specific information on resources and tasks in capability assessments, and that the assessments including both were most useful, from a decision-making perspective.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 259
页数:9
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Evaluating risk and vulnerability assessments: a study of the regional level in Sweden [J].
Abrahamsson, Marcus ;
Tehler, Henrik .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT, 2013, 9 (01) :76-92
[2]   Science and Decisions: Advancing Risk Assessment [J].
Abt, Eileen ;
Rodricks, Joseph V. ;
Levy, Jonathan I. ;
Zeise, Lauren ;
Burke, Thomas A. .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2010, 30 (07) :1028-1036
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, UNISDR TERM DIS RISK
[4]   On how to define, understand and describe risk [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2010, 95 (06) :623-631
[5]   The Role of Quantitative Risk Assessments for Characterizing Risk and Uncertainty and Delineating Appropriate Risk Management Options, with Special Emphasis on Terrorism Risk [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (04) :587-600
[6]  
Biddle Stephen., 2006, MILITARY POWER EXPLA
[7]   On the state of the art: risk communication to decision-makers [J].
Bier, VM .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2001, 71 (02) :151-157
[8]  
Bordens K.S., 2010, RES DESIGN METHODS P, V7th
[9]   Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design [J].
Charness, Gary ;
Gneezy, Uri ;
Kuhn, Michael A. .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2012, 81 (01) :1-8
[10]   TEN TRENDS IN CAPABILITY PLANNING FOR DEFENCE AND SECURITY [J].
De Spiegeleire, Stephan .
RUSI JOURNAL, 2011, 156 (05) :20-28