Direct mailing was a successful recruitment strategy for a lung-cancer screening trial

被引:36
作者
Hinshaw, Lisa B.
Jackson, Sharon A.
Chen, Michael Y.
机构
[1] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Radiol, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
[2] Wake Forest Univ, Sch Med, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Winston Salem, NC 27157 USA
关键词
recruitment method; lung cancer screening; enrollment; advertising; clinical trial; smokers;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.005
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: To analyze advertising, recruitment methods, and study participant demographics for the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) site at Wake Forest University School of Medicine to define efficient ways to recruit participants for general clinical trials. Study Design and Setting: Recruitment method data, demographics, geographic location, and date of enrollment were collected from all 1,112 NLST participants. Marketing data and financial records were analyzed to determine the effectiveness of each recruitment method. Results: The total amount spent on advertising was $144,668, with the cost of enrollment per participant averaging $130. For black participants, the recruitment cost per person was $406, whereas for white and other race participants, the cost was $122 (P < 0.0001). To encourage minority enrollment, $13,192 was spent on television advertising geared toward black viewers, resulting in eight black participants at an average cost per person of $1,649. Direct mailing cost $143 per participant recruited, whereas TV ads cost $382 per participant. Conclusion: Direct mailing to a targeted group was the most efficient way to recruit participants. Printed advertising methods, that is, newspaper ads and brochures. were quite effective, whereas television ads were expensive. Appropriate minority recruitment needs sufficient attention and resources to ensure census groups are adequately represented. (C) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:853 / 857
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
Aitken Leanne, 2003, Int J Nurs Pract, V9, P338, DOI 10.1046/j.1440-172X.2003.00449.x
[2]  
CALLES J, 2005, MODEL ACAD MEDIA COL
[3]  
CONNETT JE, 1993, CONTROL CLIN TRIALS, V14, pS38
[4]   Mass mailing and staff experience in a total recruitment program for a clinical trial: The SHEP experience [J].
Cosgrove, N ;
Borhani, NO ;
Bailey, G ;
Borhani, P ;
Levin, J ;
Hoffmeier, M ;
Krieger, S ;
Lovato, LC ;
Petrovitch, H ;
Vogt, T ;
Wilson, AC ;
Breeson, V ;
Probstfield, JL .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1999, 20 (02) :133-148
[5]   Recruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial: A comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategies [J].
Folmar, S ;
Oates-Williams, F ;
Sharp, P ;
Reboussin, D ;
Smith, J ;
Cheshire, K ;
Macer, J ;
Klein, KP ;
Herrington, D .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2001, 22 (01) :13-25
[6]   Community-based recruitment strategies for a longitudinal interventional study: the VECAT experience [J].
Garrett, SKM ;
Thomas, AP ;
Cicuttini, FM ;
Silagy, C ;
Taylor, HR ;
McNeil, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2000, 53 (05) :541-548
[7]   Using direct mail to recruit hispanic adults into a dietary intervention: An experimental study [J].
Kiernan, M ;
Phillips, K ;
Fair, JM ;
King, AC .
ANNALS OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 2000, 22 (01) :89-93
[8]   Challenges faced in recruiting patients from primary care practices into a physical activity intervention trial [J].
Margitic, S ;
Sevick, MA ;
Miller, M ;
Albright, C ;
Banton, J ;
Callahan, K ;
Garcia, M ;
Gibbons, L ;
Levine, BJ ;
Anderson, R ;
Ettinger, W .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1999, 29 (04) :277-286
[9]  
*N CAR I MED, 2003, NC LAT HLTH 2003 REP
[10]   Recruitment for a community-based study of early pregnancy: the Right From The Start study [J].
Promislow, JHE ;
Makarushka, CM ;
Gorman, JR ;
Howards, PP ;
Savitz, DA ;
Hartmann, KE .
PAEDIATRIC AND PERINATAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (02) :143-152