Ground reaction forces during gait in pregnant fallers and non-fallers

被引:37
作者
McCrory, Jean L. [1 ,2 ]
Chambers, April J. [3 ]
Daftary, Ashi [4 ]
Redfern, Mark S. [2 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Human Performance & Appl Exercise Sci, Div Exercise Physiol, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Hlth & Phys Activ, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Bioengn, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Maternal Fetal Med, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Gait; Center of pressure; Ground reaction forces; Pregnancy; Walking; DYNAMIC POSTURAL STABILITY; WALKING; TRAUMA; COORDINATION; PHASE; PAIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.07.007
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Pregnant women are at a high risk of experiencing a fall. To our knowledge, ground reaction forces (GRFs) in pregnant fallers and non-fallers have not been reported. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of pregnancy and fall history on GRFs during walking. Methods: Forty one pregnant subjects in the mid 2nd and 3rd trimesters (pregnant fallers: n = 15, pregnant non-fallers: n = 14), and 40 control women walked at a freely chosen walking speed along an 8 m walkway. A force plate, hidden in the walkway, was used to collect GRFs (1080 Hz). Kinematic data (120 Hz) were collected from a marker placed on the lumbar spine to estimate walking velocity. GRF variables included mediolateral Center of Pressure (COP) excursion, and GRFs normalized to body mass. A two factor ANOVA (trimester x fall group) was used to compare subject demographics, and walking velocity (alpha = 0.05). A two factor ANCOVA (trimester x fall group, covariate: velocity) was performed to examine other GRF variables (Bonferroni corrected alpha = 0.006) and the mediolateral COP excursion (alpha = 0.05). Results: Walking velocity was greater in the control group (p < 0.05). No differences were seen in the GRFs or COP movement between trimesters or between pregnant fallers and non-fallers. Conclusions: When walking velocity was considered in the statistical model, ground reaction forces are essentially unchanged by pregnancy. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:524 / 528
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Biomechanical characteristics of elderly individuals walking on land and in water
    Barela, Ana M. F.
    Duarte, Marcos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ELECTROMYOGRAPHY AND KINESIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (03) : 446 - 454
  • [2] CHANGES IN JOINT LAXITY OCCURRING DURING PREGNANCY
    CALGUNERI, M
    BIRD, HA
    WRIGHT, V
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1982, 41 (02) : 126 - 128
  • [3] Trauma and pregnancy
    Connolly, AM
    Katz, VL
    Bash, KL
    McMahon, MJ
    Hansen, WF
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 1997, 14 (06) : 331 - 336
  • [4] EXERCISE, POSTURE, AND BACK PAIN DURING PREGNANCY .1. EXERCISE AND POSTURE
    DUMAS, GA
    REID, JG
    WOLFE, LA
    GRIFFIN, MP
    MCGRATH, MJ
    [J]. CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1995, 10 (02) : 98 - 103
  • [5] Falls in workers during pregnancy: Risk factors, job hazards, and high risk occupations
    Dunning, K
    LeMasters, G
    Levin, L
    Bhattacharya, A
    Alterman, T
    Lordo, K
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 2003, 44 (06) : 664 - 672
  • [6] Dynamic postural stability is not impaired by moderate-intensity physical activity in healthy or balance-impaired older people
    Egerton, Thorlene
    Brauer, Sandra G.
    Cresswell, Andrew G.
    [J]. HUMAN MOVEMENT SCIENCE, 2010, 29 (06) : 1011 - 1022
  • [7] Enders LA., 2009, P BMES 2009 ANN FALL
  • [8] TRAUMA - THE LEADING CAUSE OF MATERNAL DEATH
    FILDES, J
    REED, L
    JONES, N
    MARTIN, M
    BARRETT, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1992, 32 (05) : 643 - 645
  • [9] A biomechanical analysis of gait during pregnancy
    Foti, T
    Davids, JR
    Bagley, A
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (05) : 625 - 632
  • [10] Effect of pregnancy on trunk range of motion when sitting and standing
    Gilleard, W
    Crosbie, J
    Smith, R
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 81 (11) : 1011 - 1020