Exploring the neural substrates of misinformation processing

被引:45
作者
Gordon, Andrew [1 ]
Brooks, Jonathan C. W. [1 ,2 ]
Quadflieg, Susanne [1 ]
Ecker, Ullrich K. H. [3 ]
Lewandowsky, Stephan [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Sch Expt Psychol, 5 Priory Rd, Bristol BS8 1TU, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Clin Res & Imaging Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Western Australia, Sch Psychol Sci, Perth, WA, Australia
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Continued influence effect; Misinformation; Memory updating; ANTERIOR CINGULATE CORTEX; CONTINUED INFLUENCE; UNWANTED MEMORIES; COGNITIVE CONTROL; NARRATIVE SPEECH; BRAIN IMAGES; IRAQ WAR; COMPREHENSION; REGISTRATION; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.003
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
It is well known that information that is initially thought to be correct but then revealed to be false, often continues to influence human judgement and decision making despite people being aware of the retraction. Yet little research has examined the underlying neural substrates of this phenomenon, which is known as the 'continued influence effect of misinformation' (CIEM). It remains unclear how the human brain processes critical information that retracts prior claims. To address this question in further detail, 26 healthy adults underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) while listening to brief narratives which either involved a retraction of prior information or not. Following each narrative, subjects' comprehension of the narrative, including their inclination to rely on retracted information, was probed. As expected, it was found that retracted information continued to affect participants' narrative-related reasoning. In addition, the fMRI data indicated that the continued influence of retracted information may be due to a breakdown of narrative-level integration and coherence-building mechanisms implemented by the precuneus and posterior cingulate gyrus.
引用
收藏
页码:216 / 224
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]   Neural systems underlying the suppression of unwanted memories [J].
Anderson, MC ;
Ochsner, KN ;
Kuhl, B ;
Cooper, J ;
Robertson, E ;
Gabrieli, SW ;
Glover, GH ;
Gabrieli, JDE .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5655) :232-235
[2]   Neural mechanisms of motivated forgetting [J].
Anderson, Michael C. ;
Hanslmayr, Simon .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (06) :279-292
[3]   A theoretical review of the misinformation effect: Predictions from an activation-based memory model [J].
Ayers, MS ;
Reder, LM .
PSYCHONOMIC BULLETIN & REVIEW, 1998, 5 (01) :1-21
[4]   Opposing Mechanisms Support the Voluntary Forgetting of Unwanted Memories [J].
Benoit, Roland G. ;
Anderson, Michael C. .
NEURON, 2012, 76 (02) :450-460
[5]   The psychophysics toolbox [J].
Brainard, DH .
SPATIAL VISION, 1997, 10 (04) :433-436
[6]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[7]   Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex [J].
Bush, G ;
Luu, P ;
Posner, MI .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (06) :215-222
[8]   Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data [J].
Carter, Cameron S. ;
van Veen, Vincent .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 7 (04) :367-379
[9]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[10]   Failing to Forget: Inhibitory-Control Deficits Compromise Memory Suppression in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder [J].
Catarino, Ana ;
Kuepper, Charlotte S. ;
Werner-Seidler, Aliza ;
Dalgleish, Tim ;
Anderson, Michael C. .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2015, 26 (05) :604-616