Slender-Wing Beam Reduction Method for Gradient-Based Aeroelastic Design Optimization

被引:3
作者
Stodieck, O. [1 ]
Cooper, J. E. [2 ]
Neild, S. A. [3 ]
Lowenberg, M. H. [4 ]
Iorga, L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Aerosp Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Nonlinear Struct Dynam, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[4] Univ Bristol, Dept Aerosp Engn, Flight Dynam, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
[5] Airbus Operat Ltd, Pegasus House,Aerosp Ave, Bristol BS34 7PA, Avon, England
基金
“创新英国”项目; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Laminated composites - Wings - Aeroelasticity - Design aids - Stiffness - Structural dynamics;
D O I
10.2514/1.J056952
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
The efficiency and scope of aeroelastic wing optimization strategies can be increased using analysis-specific structural idealizations, such as high-fidelity models for detailed stress analyses and low-fidelity models for aeroelastic analyses. In this work, a numerical method is presented that enables the efficient and accurate reduction of a high-fidelity finite element model to a Timoshenko beam-based model with lumped masses. The result is a representation based on 13 independent physical beam stiffness parameters per element. The method also yields analytical beam sensitivities with respect to changes in the high-fidelity model. Using these, an approach is suggested for integrating the beam reduction method into a gradient-based multidisciplinary-design-optimization architecture. The reduction technique is demonstrated on a simplified wing box and on the University of Bristol Ultra-Green aircraft configuration wing. The effects of unbalanced skin composite laminates, rotated internal ribs, varying wing taper and sweep, and wing boundary constraints on the wing stiffness are shown to be captured with sufficient accuracy for static and dynamic aeroelastic analysis purposes. The accuracy of the analytically calculated gradients is demonstrated by comparison with complex-step and finite difference derivative approximations.
引用
收藏
页码:4529 / 4545
页数:17
相关论文
共 35 条
[11]  
Howcroft C., 2016, 15 DYN SPEC C JAN
[12]  
Hu P., 2010, 51 AIAA ASME ASCE AH, DOI [10. 2514/6. 2010-3063, DOI 10.2514/6.2010-3063]
[13]  
Khodaparast H.H., 2012, J. Aeroelasticity Struct. Dyn., V2, P33
[14]   GENERAL BEHAVIOR AND SHEAR CENTER LOCATION OF PRISMATIC ANISOTROPIC BEAMS VIA POWER-SERIES [J].
KOSMATKA, JB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 1994, 31 (03) :417-439
[15]  
Librescu L., 2006, Springer Link Bucher, V131, DOI 10.1007/1-4020-4203-5
[16]   Extraction of equivalent beam properties from blade models [J].
Malcolm, David J. ;
Laird, Daniel L. .
WIND ENERGY, 2007, 10 (02) :135-157
[17]   Review and Unification of Methods for Computing Derivatives of Multidisciplinary Computational Models [J].
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. ;
Hwang, John T. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (11) :2582-2599
[18]   Multidisciplinary Design Optimization: A Survey of Architectures [J].
Martins, Joaquim R. R. A. ;
Lambe, Andrew B. .
AIAA JOURNAL, 2013, 51 (09) :2049-2075
[19]   The complex-step derivative approximation [J].
Martins, JRRA ;
Sturdza, P ;
Alonso, JJ .
ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MATHEMATICAL SOFTWARE, 2003, 29 (03) :245-262
[20]   The influence of material properties on the aeroelastic behavior of a composite wind turbine blade [J].
Rafiee, Roham ;
Moradi, Mohsen ;
Khanpour, Motahareh .
JOURNAL OF RENEWABLE AND SUSTAINABLE ENERGY, 2016, 8 (06)