Adjuvant Treatment for High-Risk Clear Cell Renal Cancer Updated Results of a High-Risk Subset of the ASSURE Randomized Trial

被引:140
作者
Haas, Naomi B. [1 ]
Manola, Judith [2 ]
Dutcher, Janice P. [3 ]
Flaherty, Keith T. [4 ]
Uzzo, Robert G. [5 ]
Atkins, Michael B. [6 ]
DiPaola, Robert S. [7 ,8 ]
Choueiri, Toni K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Abramson Canc Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[3] Canc Res Fdn, New York, NY USA
[4] Massachusetts Gen Hosp, Boston, MA 02114 USA
[5] Fox Chase Canc Ctr, 7701 Burholme Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19111 USA
[6] Georgetown Lombardi Comprehens Canc Ctr, Washington, DC USA
[7] Rutgers Canc Inst New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[8] Univ Kentucky, Coll Med, Lexington, KY 40506 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
CARCINOMA; NEPHRECTOMY; SUNITINIB;
D O I
10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0076
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
IMPORTANCE Given recently published results of a 750-patient adjuvant sunitinib trial showing improved disease-free survival (DFS), the appropriate strategy for treating high-risk patients is unclear. We sought to determine whether there is improved disease-free survival benefit to taking the active drug in patients with high-risk (pT3, pT4, node-positive) clear cell renal cancer (ccRCC) in the ASSURE trial (adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib vs placebo in resected unfavorable renal cell carcinoma [RCC]), the largest adjuvant trial published to date. OBJECTIVE To evaluate DFS and overall survival (OS) in ccRCC high-risk patients randomized to sunitinib or sorafenib vs placebo among patients with stages comparable to other high-risk adjuvant trials. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The DFS and OS at 10 years postactivation were calculated for 1069 patients in US and Canadian cooperative groups with high-risk patients who had ccRCC histology and pT3, pT4, or node-positive disease accrued between 2006 and 2010 to the double-blind randomized placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Outcome analyses by dose quartiles of these patients receiving sunitinib or sorafenib were also performed. INTERVENTIONS Patients received 1 year of adjuvant sunitinib (50 mg), sorafenib (800 mg) daily, or equivalent placebo. The study was amended for patient intolerance to sunitinib (37.5 mg), sorafenib (400 mg) daily, or equivalent placebo with mandatory dose escalation if no serious adverse effects were experienced. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Disease-free survival, defined as time from randomization to recurrence, second primary cancer, or death. RESULTS Of 1069 patients, 358 (243 [67.9%] men, 115 [32.1%] women) received sunitinib, 355 (248 [69.9%] men, 107 [30.1%] women) received sorafenib, and 356 (254 [71.3%] men, 102 [28.7%] women) received placebo as adjuvant therapy. The mean (SD) age for each group was 58.3 (10.6) years, 56.8 (10.3) years, and 57.5 (10.4) years, respectively. Five-year DFS rates were 47.7%, 49.9%, and 50.0%, respectively for sunitinib, sorafenib, and placebo (HR, 0.94 for sunitinib vs placebo; and HR, 0.90; 97.5% CI, 0.71-1.14 for sorafenib vs placebo), with 5-year OS of 75.2%, 80.2%, and 76.5%(HR, 1.06; 97.5% CI, 0.78-1.45; P = .66, sunitinib vs placebo; and HR, 0.80; 97.5% CI, 0.58-1.11; P = .12 for sorafenib vs placebo). There was no difference by dose quartile. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Neither prognostic category of the tumor nor dose intensity of therapy altered the lack of difference in DFS or OS in this population of patients with high-risk ccRCC.
引用
收藏
页码:1249 / 1252
页数:4
相关论文
共 9 条
[1]  
Chamie K, 2016, JAMA ONCOL, DOI [10.1001/jamaoncol.2016, DOI 10.1001/JAMAONCOL.2016]
[2]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[3]  
Greene F., 2002, AJCC cancer staging handbook: From the AJCC cancer staging manual, V6th
[4]   Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial [J].
Haas, Naomi B. ;
Manola, Judith ;
Uzzo, Robert G. ;
Flaherty, Keith T. ;
Wood, Christopher G. ;
Kane, Christopher ;
Jewett, Michael ;
Dutcher, Janice P. ;
Atkins, Michael B. ;
Pins, Michael ;
Wilding, George ;
Cella, David ;
Wagner, Lynne ;
Matin, Surena ;
Kuzel, Timothy M. ;
Sexton, Wade J. ;
Wong, Yu-Ning ;
Choueiri, Toni K. ;
Pili, Roberto ;
Puzanov, Igor ;
Kohli, Manish ;
Stadler, Walter ;
Carducci, Michael ;
Coomes, Robert ;
DiPaola, Robert S. .
LANCET, 2016, 387 (10032) :2008-2016
[5]   Assessment of the pathologic inclusion criteria from contemporary adjuvant clinical trials for predicting disease progression after nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma [J].
Kim, Simon P. ;
Crispen, Paul L. ;
Thompson, R. Houston ;
Weight, Christopher J. ;
Boorjian, Stephen A. ;
Costello, Brian A. ;
Lohse, Christine M. ;
Leibovich, Bradley C. .
CANCER, 2012, 118 (18) :4412-4420
[6]   Postoperative surveillance protocol for patients with localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma based on a validated prognostic nomogram and risk group stratification system [J].
Lam, JS ;
Shvarts, O ;
Leppert, JT ;
Pantuck, AJ ;
Figlin, RA ;
Belldegrun, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2005, 174 (02) :466-472
[7]   Adjuvant Therapy for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Past, Present, and Future [J].
Pal, Sumanta K. ;
Haas, Naomi B. .
ONCOLOGIST, 2014, 19 (08) :851-859
[8]   The Primary Outcome Fails - What Next? [J].
Pocock, Stuart J. ;
Stone, Gregg W. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (09) :861-870
[9]   Adjuvant Sunitinib in High-Risk Renal-Cell Carcinoma after Nephrectomy [J].
Ravaud, A. ;
Motzer, R. J. ;
Pandha, H. S. ;
George, D. J. ;
Pantuck, A. J. ;
Patel, A. ;
Chang, Y. -H. ;
Escudier, B. ;
Donskov, F. ;
Magheli, A. ;
Carteni, G. ;
Laguerre, B. ;
Tomczak, P. ;
Breza, J. ;
Gerletti, P. ;
Lechuga, M. ;
Lin, X. ;
Martini, J. -F. ;
Ramaswamy, K. ;
Casey, M. ;
Staehler, M. ;
Patard, J. -J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2016, 375 (23) :2246-2254