Inflammatory side effects of BRAF and MEK inhibitors

被引:17
|
作者
Mackin, Anna G. [1 ]
Pecen, Paula E. [1 ]
Dinsmore, Amanda L. [3 ]
Patnaik, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Gonzalez, Rene [2 ]
Robinson, William A. [2 ]
Palestine, Alan G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Dept Ophthalmol, Aurora, CO USA
[2] Univ Colorado, Sch Med, Cutaneous Oncol Clin, Dept Med,Div Med Oncol, Aurora, CO USA
[3] Birmingham VA Med Ctr, Dept Ophthalmol, Birmingham, AL USA
关键词
BRAF inhibitor; inflammation; malignant melanoma; MEK inhibitor; safety; METASTATIC MELANOMA; IMPROVED SURVIVAL; OPEN-LABEL; DABRAFENIB; MUTATIONS; VEMURAFENIB; MULTICENTER; COMBINATION; TRAMETINIB; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1097/CMR.0000000000000599
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to describe inflammatory side effects in patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors at a single tertiary care institution. This was a retrospective chart review of patients prescribed single-agent or combination BRAF and MEK inhibitors from January 2010 until May 2015. The primary outcome was the presence of inflammatory side effects. Among 124 patients, 56.4% were male, the median age was 59 years, and most (91.1%) were treated for metastatic melanoma. Most patients (74.2%) developed inflammatory side effects, some with multiple occurrences, for a total of 211 occurrences. The overall prevalence of inflammatory side effects did not differ across therapies. In a subanalysis, patients treated with both single-agent and combination therapies were more likely to experience an inflammatory side effect on single-agent therapy (P = 0.0126 for BRAF inhibitor, P = 0.0833 for MEK inhibitor). The most common inflammatory side effects for the entire cohort included arthralgias/myalgias (32.9%), nonacneiform rash (28.0%), pyrexia (25.5%), and erythema nodosum (11.2%), although side effects differed across the class of therapy. Corticosteroids were initiated in 73 side effect instances among 47 patients. Drug interruption or dose reduction was reported in 78 side effect instances in 50 patients. Fifteen side effect instances led to treatment termination. There is a high prevalence of inflammatory side effects encompassing all organ systems in patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. There is no significant difference in the prevalence of inflammatory side effects in patients treated with single-agent versus combination therapies, however, side effect profile differs across agents.
引用
收藏
页码:522 / 526
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Cardiac Effects of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: Mechanisms and Clinical Management
    Pierre-Yves Courand
    Mathilde Berger
    Anissa Bouali
    Brahim Harbaoui
    Pierre Lantelme
    Stéphane Dalle
    Current Oncology Reports, 2022, 24 : 265 - 271
  • [32] BRAF Mutations and the Utility of RAF and MEK Inhibitors in Primary Brain Tumors
    Schreck, Karisa C.
    Grossman, Stuart A.
    Pratilas, Christine A.
    CANCERS, 2019, 11 (09)
  • [33] Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With BRAF and MEK Inhibitors A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Mincu, Raluca I.
    Mahabadi, Amir A.
    Michel, Lars
    Mrotzek, Simone M.
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Rassaf, Tienush
    Totzeck, Matthias
    JAMA NETWORK OPEN, 2019, 2 (08) : E198890
  • [34] Upstream mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway inhibition: MEK inhibitor followed by a BRAF inhibitor in advanced melanoma patients
    Goldinger, Simone M.
    Zimmer, Lisa
    Schulz, Carsten
    Ugurel, Selma
    Hoeller, Christoph
    Kaehler, Katharina C.
    Schadendorf, Dirk
    Hassel, Jessica C.
    Becker, Juergen
    Hauschild, Axel
    Dummer, Reinhard
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (02) : 406 - 410
  • [35] Recent advances in the treatment of melanoma with BRAF and MEK inhibitors
    Munoz-Couselo, Eva
    Soberino Garcia, Jesus
    Manuel Perez-Garcia, Jose
    Ortega Cebrian, Vanesa
    Cortes Castan, Javier
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2015, 3 (15)
  • [36] Combined BRAF and MEK Inhibition versus BRAF Inhibition Alone in Melanoma
    Long, G. V.
    Stroyakovskiy, D.
    Gogas, H.
    Levchenko, E.
    de Braud, F.
    Larkin, J.
    Garbe, C.
    Jouary, T.
    Hauschild, A.
    Grob, J. J.
    Sileni, V. Chiarion
    Lebbe, C.
    Mandala, M.
    Millward, M.
    Arance, A.
    Bondarenko, I.
    Haanen, J. B. A. G.
    Hansson, J.
    Utikal, J.
    Ferraresi, V.
    Kovalenko, N.
    Mohr, P.
    Probachai, V.
    Schadendorf, D.
    Nathan, P.
    Robert, C.
    Ribas, A.
    DeMarini, D. J.
    Irani, J. G.
    Casey, M.
    Ouellet, D.
    Martin, A. -M.
    Le, N.
    Patel, K.
    Flaherty, K.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2014, 371 (20) : 1877 - 1888
  • [37] Ocular Safety Profile of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors Data from the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database
    Mettler, Camille
    Monnet, Dominique
    Kramkimel, Nora
    Treluyer, Jean-Marc
    Mouthon, Luc
    Brezin, Antoine
    Dupin, Nicolas
    Valnet-Rabier, Marie-Blanche
    Chouchana, Laurent
    Terrier, Benjamin
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2021, 128 (12) : 1748 - 1755
  • [38] Mechanisms of resistance to BRAF and MEK inhibitors and clinical update of US Food and Drug Administration-approved targeted therapy in advanced melanoma
    Kakadia, Sunilkumar
    Yarlagadda, Naveen
    Awad, Ramez
    Kundranda, Madappa
    Niu, Jiaxin
    Naraev, Boris
    Mina, Lida
    Dragovich, Tomislav
    Gimbel, Mark
    Mahmoud, Fade
    ONCOTARGETS AND THERAPY, 2018, 11 : 7095 - 7107
  • [39] Empiric Therapy with BRAF and MEK Inhibitors in Metastatic Melanoma
    Cann, Christopher G.
    Tillman, Benjamin F.
    Davis, Elizabeth J.
    Johnson, Douglas B.
    ONCOLOGIST, 2019, 24 (11) : 1495 - 1496
  • [40] Adverse skin reactions induced by BRAF inhibitors: A systematic review
    Sibaud, V.
    Lamant, L.
    Maisongrosse, V.
    Delord, J. -P.
    ANNALES DE DERMATOLOGIE ET DE VENEREOLOGIE, 2013, 140 (8-9): : 510 - 520