Effectiveness of Bi-Needle Technique (Hybrid Yeung Endoscopic Spine System/ Transforaminal Endoscopic Spine System) for Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

被引:9
作者
Wu, Xiao-Dong [1 ]
Chen, Yu [1 ]
Yu, Wen-Chao [1 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ]
Cao, Peng [1 ]
Tian, Ye [1 ]
Wang, Xin-Wei [1 ]
Chen, Hua-Jiang [1 ]
Ye, Xiao-Jian [1 ]
Yuan, Wen [1 ]
Yeung, Anthony [1 ]
机构
[1] Second Mil Med Univ, Changzheng Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Shanghai, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Bi-needle technique; Lumbar disc herniation; Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy; Selective endoscopic discectomy; DISC HERNIATION; INTERLAMINAR; SURGERY; FORAMINOPLASTY; PEID;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.220
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The hi-needle technique is a new technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy. This technique combines the advantages of Yeung endoscopic spine system (YESS) and transforaminal endoscopic spine system (TESSYS) techniques. The aim of this study was to evaluate effectiveness of the bi-needle technique for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and compare it with the TESSYS technique. METHODS: We reviewed 86 patients with single-level lumbar disc herniation treated by percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy in our hospital from June 2013 to December 2015. Bi-needle technique was used in 49 patients (30 men, 19 women; average age 40.4 +/- 5.2 years). TESSYS technique was used in 37 patients (19 men, 18 women; average age 42.8 +/- 6.4 years). Clinical results were evaluated and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS: Symptoms in both groups were significantly improved at the last follow-up (P < 0.01). There was no statistical difference in visual analog scale and lumbar Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores between bi-needle and TESSYS groups at last follow-up (P = 0.69 and P = 0.33, respectively). Operative time was shorter in the bi-needle group (P < 0.01). Recurrence rate and reoperation rate were lower in the bi-needle group (P = 0.04 and P = 0.03, respectively). Discitis was diagnosed in 2 patients in the TESSYS group. There were no patients with postoperative discitis in the bi-needle group. CONCLUSIONS: The bi-needle technique is safe and effective for treatment of lumbar disc herniation. Compared with TESSYS technique, operative time is shorter, and recurrence and reoperation rates are lower.
引用
收藏
页码:E53 / E59
页数:7
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] A meta-analysis of endoscopic discectomy versus open discectomy for symptomatic lumbar disk herniation
    Cong, Lin
    Zhu, Yue
    Tu, Guanjun
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2016, 25 (01) : 134 - 143
  • [2] Clinical outcomes after percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a prospective case series
    Gadjradj, Pravesh S.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    Dirven, Clemens M. F.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Harhangi, B. Sanjay
    [J]. NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2016, 40 (02) : 1 - 7
  • [3] Transforaminal endoscopic spinal surgery: The future 'gold standard' for discectomy? - A review
    Gibson, J. N. Alastair
    Cowie, Jonathan G.
    Iprenburg, Menno
    [J]. SURGEON-JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL COLLEGES OF SURGEONS OF EDINBURGH AND IRELAND, 2012, 10 (05): : 290 - 296
  • [4] Gupta RS, 2015, Open J Orthop, V5, P208, DOI [10.4236/ojo.2015.57028, DOI 10.4236/OJO.2015.57028]
  • [5] Learning curve of full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy
    Hsu, Hsien-Ta
    Chang, Shang-Jen
    Yang, Stephen S.
    Chai, Chung Liang
    [J]. EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2013, 22 (04) : 727 - 733
  • [6] Jasper GP, 2014, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V17, pE703
  • [7] Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar discectomy:: A critical appraisal
    Kafadar, A.
    Kahraman, S.
    Akboeru, M.
    [J]. MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 49 (02) : 74 - 79
  • [8] Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) following transforaminal percutaneous endoscopic discectomy (TPED) for lumbar disc herniation: A prospective cohort study - early results
    Kapetanakis, S.
    Giovannopoulou, E.
    Charitoudis, G.
    Kazakos, K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BACK AND MUSCULOSKELETAL REHABILITATION, 2017, 30 (06) : 1311 - 1317
  • [9] Kapetanakis S, 2017, WORLD J ORTHOP, V8, P874, DOI 10.5312/wjo.v8.i12.874
  • [10] Kim HS, 2013, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V16, P359