Laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy versus laparoscopic sacral colpopexy plus supracervical hysterectomy in patients with pelvic organ prolapse

被引:21
作者
Campagna, Giuseppe [1 ]
Vacca, Lorenzo [1 ]
Panico, Giovanni [1 ]
Rumolo, Valerio [1 ]
Caramazza, Daniela [1 ]
Lombisani, Andrea [1 ]
Rossitto, Cristiano [1 ]
Gadonneix, Pierre [2 ]
Scambia, Giovanni [3 ,4 ]
Ercoli, Alfredo [5 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Bambino & Sanita, UOC Uroginecol & Chirurg Ricostrutt Pavimento Pel, Largo F Vito 1, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[2] Fdn St Jean de Dieu, Obstet & Gynaecol Dept, Paris, France
[3] Fdn Policlin Univ A Gemelli IRCCS, Dipartimento Sci Salute Donna & Bambino & Sanita, UOC Ginecol Oncol, Rome, Italy
[4] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, Ist Ginecol Ostetricia, Rome, Italy
[5] Univ Messina, Policlin G Martino, PID Ginecol Oncol & Chirurg Ginecol Miniinvas, Messina, Italy
关键词
Prolapse; Sacropexy; Hysteropexy; Sacrohysteropexy laparoscopy; Subtotal hysterectomy; ICS JOINT REPORT; COMPLICATIONS; TERMINOLOGY;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-021-04865-0
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis The choice of whether or not to preserve the uterus in the case of patients with urogenital prolapse who undergo sacral colpopexy is still debated. We compared objective and subjective outcomes of laparoscopic sacral hysteropexy (LSHP) and laparoscopic sacral colpopexy with concomitant supracervical hysterectomy (LSCP/SCH) in patients with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted at the Urogynecology Department of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS of Rome and at the Diaconesses Croix Saint Simon Hospital of Paris. We collected data of 136 patients; 78 underwent LSHP and 58 underwent LSCP/SCH for pelvic organ prolapse between January 2016 and December 2017. Results Patients of the two groups had similar preoperative characteristics. All patients completed 24-month follow-up evaluation. Overall, anatomical cure rate was 84.6% and 87.9% in the LSHP group and LSCP/SCH group, respectively, without statistically significant differences. In particular, in the LSHP group the anatomical success rate was 94.9%, 92.3% and 92.3% for the apical, anterior and posterior vaginal compartment whereas in the LSHP group LSCP/SCH was 100%, 91.4% and 94.8%, respectively. Subjective success rate was 89.7% among patients who underwent LSHP and 93.1% among women who underwent LSCP/SCH (p = 0.494). The median operative time (OT) was significantly shorter in LSHP. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of estimated blood loss, conversion to laparotomy and intra- and postoperative complications. Patients' satisfaction was high in both groups without statistical differences. Conclusions Both laparoscopic procedures are safe and effective in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. LSHP can be offered as an alternative in women who are strongly motivated to preserve the uterus in the absence of abnormal uterine findings.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 368
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Step by Step Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy with Uterine Arteries Ligation at the Origin
    Alletti, Salvatore Gueli
    Restaino, Stefano
    Finelli, Angelo
    Ronsini, Carlo
    Lucidi, Alessandro
    Scambia, Giovanni
    Fanfani, Francesco
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 27 (01) : 22 - 23
  • [2] Incidence of Unanticipated Uterine Pathology at the Time of Minimally Invasive Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy
    Andy, Uduak U.
    Nosti, Patrick A.
    Kane, Sarah
    White, Dena
    Lowenstein, Lior
    Gutman, Robert E.
    Harvie, Heidi S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 21 (01) : 97 - 100
  • [3] Pelvic Organ Prolapse
    不详
    [J]. FEMALE PELVIC MEDICINE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2019, 25 (06): : 397 - 408
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2019, Urogynecologic Surgical Mesh Implants |
  • [5] Abdominal sacral suspensions: Analysis of complications using permanent mesh
    Bensinger, G
    Lind, L
    Lesser, M
    Guess, M
    Winkler, HA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 193 (06) : 2094 - 2098
  • [6] Laparoscopic Sacropexy: A Retrospective Analysis of Perioperative Complications and Anatomical Outcomes
    Bojahr, Bernd
    Tchartchian, Garri
    Waldschmidt, Matthias
    Schollmeyer, Thoralf
    De Wilde, Rudy L.
    [J]. JSLS-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LAPAROENDOSCOPIC SURGEONS, 2012, 16 (03) : 428 - 436
  • [7] Uterus preservation in surgical correction of urogenital prolapse
    Costantini, E
    Mearini, L
    Bini, V
    Zucchi, A
    Mearini, E
    Porena, M
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2005, 48 (04) : 642 - 649
  • [8] Sacrocolpopexy for pelvic organ prolapse: evidence-based review and recommendations
    Costantini, Elisabetta
    Brubaker, Linda
    Cervigni, Mauro
    Matthews, Catherine A.
    O'Reilly, Barry A.
    Rizk, Diaa
    Giannitsas, Konstantinos
    Maher, Christopher F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2016, 205 : 60 - 65
  • [9] Incidence rate and risk factors for vaginal vault prolapse repair after hysterectomy
    Daellenbach, Patrick
    Kaelin-Gambirasio, Isabelle
    Jacob, Sandrine
    Dubuisson, Jean-Bernard
    Boulvain, Michel
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2008, 19 (12) : 1623 - 1629
  • [10] Classification of surgical complications - A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey
    Dindo, D
    Demartines, N
    Clavien, PA
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 240 (02) : 205 - 213