Corporate Social Performance and Innovation with High Social Benefits: A Quantitative Analysis

被引:158
作者
Wagner, Marcus [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Julius Maximilians Univ Wuerzburg, Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Bur Econ Theor & Appl, Strasbourg, France
关键词
corporate; empirical; innovation; panel; performance; social; sustainability; FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; FIRM PERFORMANCE; GREEN BUSINESS; RESPONSIBILITY; OWNERSHIP; SYSTEMS; US; INTEGRATION; DISCLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-009-0339-y
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article analyses the link between innovation with high social benefits and corporate social performance (CSP) and the role that family firms play in this. This theme is particularly relevant given the large number of firms that are family-owned. Also the implicit potential of innovation to reconcile corporate sustainability aspects with profitability justifies an extended analysis of this link. Governments often support socially beneficial innovation with various policy instruments, with the intention of increasing international competitiveness and simultaneously supporting sustainable development. In parallel, firms pursue corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental management activities partly in the hope that this will foster such innovation in their organisation (alongside their main aim of improving CSP). Hence, the main research question of this article is about the association of CSP with innovation with high social benefits and the determinants of the potential moderation of this association. Based on panel data, the article analyses the link between CSP and innovation, and the effect of being a family firm using panel estimation techniques. The results point to a moderating role of family firms on the link between innovation with high social benefits and CSP. The article concludes by assessing the policy implications of this insight.
引用
收藏
页码:581 / 594
页数:14
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]   The effects of firm size and industry on corporate giving [J].
Amato, Louis H. ;
Amato, Christie H. .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2007, 72 (03) :229-241
[2]   Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 [J].
Anderson, RC ;
Reeb, DM .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2003, 58 (03) :1301-1328
[3]   ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE AND EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION: AN INTEGRATED AGENCY-INSTITUTIONAL PERSPECTIVE [J].
Berrone, Pascual ;
Gomez-Mejia, Luis R. .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 52 (01) :103-126
[4]   Achieving sustainability through environmental innovation: the role of SMEs [J].
Biondi, V ;
Iraldo, F ;
Meredith, S .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2002, 24 (5-6) :612-626
[5]   Corporate social responsibility and resource-based perspectives [J].
Branco, Manuel Castelo ;
Rodrigues, Lucia Lima .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2006, 69 (02) :111-132
[6]   Determinants of environmental innovation in US manufacturing industries [J].
Brunnermeier, SB ;
Cohen, MA .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 45 (02) :278-293
[7]   Effects of "best practices" of environmental management on cost advantage: The role of complementary assets [J].
Christmann, P .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2000, 43 (04) :663-680
[8]   A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms [J].
Craig, JBL ;
Moores, K ;
Cassar, G .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 19 (01) :1-10
[9]   The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: A comparative study [J].
Craig, Justin ;
Dibrell, Clay .
FAMILY BUSINESS REVIEW, 2006, 19 (04) :275-288
[10]   Potential for hostility and faking-good in high-hostile men [J].
Davidson, K ;
Hall, P .
JOURNAL OF BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1997, 20 (01) :47-54