Failure rate modeling using fault tree analysis and Bayesian network: DEMO pulsed operation turbine study case

被引:18
作者
Dongiovanni, Danilo Nicola [1 ]
Iesmantas, Tomas [2 ]
机构
[1] ENEA, Nucl Fus & Safety Technol Dept, Via Enrico Fermi 45, I-00040 Frascati, Italy
[2] LEI, Breslaujos Str 3, Kaunas, Lithuania
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
DEMO; RAMI; Turbine; Fault tree; Bayesian network; Failure rate;
D O I
10.1016/j.fusengdes.2016.02.036
中图分类号
TL [原子能技术]; O571 [原子核物理学];
学科分类号
0827 ; 082701 ;
摘要
Availability will play an important role in the Demonstration Power Plant (DEMO) success from an economic and safety perspective. Availability performance is commonly assessed by Reliability Availability Maintainability Inspectability (RAMI) analysis, strongly relying on the accurate definition of system components failure modes (FM) and failure rates (FR). Little component experience is available in fusion application, therefore requiring the adaptation of literature FR to fusion plant operating conditions, which may differ in several aspects. As a possible solution to this problem, a new methodology to extrapolate/estimate components failure rate under different operating conditions is presented. The DEMO Balance of Plant nuclear steam turbine component operated in pulse mode is considered as study case. The methodology moves from the definition of a fault tree taking into account failure modes possibly enhanced by pulsed operation. The fault tree is then translated into a Bayesian network. A statistical model for the turbine system failure rate in terms of subcomponents' FR is hence obtained, allowing for sensitivity analyses on the structured mixture of literature and unknown FR data for which plausible value intervals are investigated to assess their impact on the whole turbine system FR. Finally, the impact of resulting turbine system FR on plant availability is assessed exploiting a Reliability Block Diagram (RBD) model for a typical secondary cooling system implementing a Rankine cycle. Mean inherent availability for a period of 20 years plant mission range from 79% to 82% when varying turbine subcomponents FR from 1E-4/h to 1E-8/h, respectively, and much lower than the 97% performance expected for steady state operation. (C) 2016 EURATOM. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:613 / 617
页数:5
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1984, WEST PRESS WAT REACT
[2]  
Cadwallader L.C., 2013, IEEE 25 S FUS ENG SO, DOI [10.1109/SOFE.2013.6635393, DOI 10.1109/SOFE.2013.6635393]
[3]  
Danilo Dongiovanni N., 2016, FUSION ENG DES, P98
[4]  
Fujiyama K., 2007, OMMI, V4, P1
[5]  
Harman J., 2012, EFDA D 2LCY7A
[6]  
He C., 2011, J COMPUT, V6
[7]   Bayesian networks in reliability [J].
Langseth, Helge ;
Portinale, Luigi .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2007, 92 (01) :92-108
[8]  
Latcovich J., 2005, 38 ANN C MOSC
[9]   Fusion component failure rate database (FCFR-DB) [J].
Pinna, T ;
Izquierdo, J ;
Porfiri, MT ;
Dies, J .
FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2006, 81 (8-14) :1391-1395
[10]  
Rolls-Royce Power Systems, 2020, PREMIERE 1 MTU GASMO