Some new results on the multinomial randomized response model

被引:20
作者
Kim, JM [1 ]
Warde, WD
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Div Sci & Math, Morris, MN 56267 USA
[2] Oklahoma State Univ, Dept Stat, Stillwater, OK 74078 USA
关键词
confidentiality; multinomial distribution; multiple comparisons; product-moment correlation; randomized response design matrix; sensitive questions;
D O I
10.1081/STA-200054378
中图分类号
O21 [概率论与数理统计]; C8 [统计学];
学科分类号
020208 ; 070103 ; 0714 ;
摘要
The randomized response technique is an effective survey method designed to elicit sensitive information while ensuring the privacy of the respondents. In this article, we present some new results on the randomization response model in situations wherein one or two response variables are assumed to follow a multinomial distribution. For a single sensitive question, we use the well-known Hopkins randomization device to derive estimates, both under the assumption of truthful and untruthful responses, and present a technique for making pairwise comparisons. When there are two sensitive questions of interest, we derive a Pearson product moment correlation estimator based on the multinomial model assumption. This estimator may be used to quantify the linear relationship between two variables when multinomial response data are observed according to a randomized-response protocol.
引用
收藏
页码:847 / 856
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   SIMULTANEOUS CONFIDENCE-INTERVALS FOR CONTRASTS AMONG MULTINOMIAL POPULATIONS [J].
GOODMAN, LA .
ANNALS OF MATHEMATICAL STATISTICS, 1964, 35 (02) :716-&
[12]   APPLICATION OF RANDOMIZED RESPONSE TECHNIQUE IN OBTAINING QUANTITATIVE DATA [J].
GREENBERG, BG ;
KUEBLER, RR ;
ABERNATHY, JR ;
HORVITZ, DG .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1971, 66 (334) :243-250
[13]   NEW DISCRETE QUANTITATIVE RANDOMIZED RESPONSE MODEL [J].
LIU, PT ;
CHOW, LP .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (353) :72-73
[14]  
MUKHOPADHYAY P, 1980, B CALCUTTA STAT ASS, V29, P133
[15]   COMPARISON OF 3 RANDOMIZED RESPONSE MODELS FOR QUANTITATIVE DATA [J].
POLLOCK, KH ;
BEK, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1976, 71 (356) :884-886
[16]  
SCHEERS NJ, 1992, MEAS EVAL COUNS DEV, V25, P27
[17]   A CRITICAL-EVALUATION OF THE RANDOMIZED-RESPONSE METHOD - APPLICATIONS, VALIDATION, AND RESEARCH AGENDA [J].
UMESH, UN ;
PETERSON, RA .
SOCIOLOGICAL METHODS & RESEARCH, 1991, 20 (01) :104-138