Researchers' choice of pain scales in trials of children undergoing surgery: A cross-sectional analysis of systematically searched randomized controlled trials and survey of authors

被引:3
作者
Gerstman, Michelle Diana [1 ,2 ]
Rolland, Lucie Renee [1 ,3 ]
Tramer, Martin Richard [1 ]
Habre, Walid [1 ]
Elia, Nadia [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Geneva Univ Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Dept Anesthesiol Pharmacol Intens Care & Emergenc, Geneva, Switzerland
[2] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Dept Anesthet Perioperat Med & Pain Med, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Lausanne Univ Hosp, Div Anesthesiol, Dept Interdisciplinary Ctr, Lausanne, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Fac Med, Geneva, Switzerland
关键词
cross-sectional studies; Pain measurement; pediatrics; post-operative pain; CORE OUTCOME DOMAINS; SELF-REPORT; CLINICAL-TRIALS; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1111/pan.14264
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background Many pain scales are used post-operatively in pediatric trials, making the comparison of trials, and the pooling of data for meta-analyses difficult. The Pediatric Initiative on Methods, Measurement, and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials (PedIMMPACT) statement, published in 2008, attempted to address this issue. We aimed to investigate the reasons for authors' choice of pain scales and the potential impact of PedIMMPACT. Methods We performed a cross-sectional analysis of systematically searched randomized controlled trials testing tramadol in children (up to 16 years) undergoing surgery, published between 2000 and 2020 (9 years prior to and 12 years following the publication of PedIMMPACT). Results Among 76 trials (6211 children), 49 unique pain scales were used. The choice of the scales was explained in 18 trials (24%); in 13 of them, authors at least partly justified their choice by the fact that the pain scale was validated. In 52 trials (68%), the pain scales were referenced, with a total of 59 unique references, most often to prior studies using the same scale (36%) or to studies validating the chosen scale (31%). Twenty-three trials (30%) provided no explanation nor reference. One single trial referenced PedIMMPACT. There was no evidence of a change in the choice of pain scales after the publication of PedIMMPACT. Conclusions A large variety of pain scales are still used in pediatric post-operative pain trials 12 years after the publication of PedIMMPACT. Only a minority of trials provided an explanation for their choice of pain scale. The reasons given most often included that the scale was validated or it was justified by a reference to a prior study using that scale. The impact of the publication of the PedIMMPACT seems limited. The ethics of the ongoing usage of large numbers of pain scales in pediatric pain trials must be challenged.
引用
收藏
页码:1194 / 1207
页数:14
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Postoperative pain, pain management, and recovery at home after pediatric tonsil surgery [J].
Alm, Fredrik ;
Lundeberg, Stefan ;
Ericsson, Elisabeth .
EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY, 2021, 278 (02) :451-461
[2]   Pain Assessment in Newborns, Infants, and Children [J].
Beltramini, Alexandra ;
Milojevic, Kolia ;
Pateron, Dominique .
PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 2017, 46 (10) :E387-E395
[3]   Outcome domains and pain outcome measures in randomized controlled trials of interventions for postoperative pain in children and adolescents [J].
Boric, Krste ;
Kadic, Antonia Jelicic ;
Boric, Matija ;
Zarandi-Nowroozi, Melissa ;
Jakus, Dora ;
Cavar, Marija ;
Dosenovic, Svjetlana ;
Jeric, Milka ;
Batinic, Marijan ;
Vukovic, Igor ;
Puljak, Livia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2019, 23 (02) :389-396
[4]   Authors' lack of awareness and use of core outcome set on postoperative pain in children is hindering comparative effectiveness research [J].
Boric, Krste ;
Boric, Matija ;
Dosenovic, Svjetlana ;
Kadic, Antonia Jelicic ;
Batinic, Marijan ;
Cavar, Marija ;
Jeric, Milka ;
Puljak, Livia .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH, 2018, 7 (05) :463-470
[5]   Pain relief: a universal human right [J].
Cousins, MJ ;
Brennan, F ;
Carr, DB .
PAIN, 2004, 112 (1-2) :1-4
[6]   STYLE MATTERS - HOW ACCURATE ARE QUOTATIONS AND REFERENCES IN MEDICAL JOURNALS [J].
DELACEY, G ;
RECORD, C ;
WADE, J .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1985, 291 (6499) :884-886
[7]   Barriers and Strategies in Guideline Implementation-A Scoping Review [J].
Fischer, Florian ;
Lange, Kerstin ;
Klose, Kristina ;
Greiner, Wolfgang ;
Kraemer, Alexander .
HEALTHCARE, 2016, 4 (03)
[8]   Ability of a meta-analysis to prevent redundant research: systematic review of studies on pain from propofol injection [J].
Habre, Celine ;
Tramer, Martin R. ;
Poepping, Daniel M. ;
Elia, Nadia .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2014, 349
[9]   Systematic review on analgesics given for pain following tonsillectomy in children [J].
Hamunen, K ;
Kontinen, V .
PAIN, 2005, 117 (1-2) :40-50
[10]   International variation in the use of evidence-based medicines for acute coronary syndromes [J].
Kramer, JM ;
Newby, LK ;
Chang, WC ;
Simes, RJ ;
Van de Werf, F ;
Granger, CB ;
Lee, KL ;
White, HD ;
Piegas, LS ;
Topol, EJ ;
Califf, RM ;
Armstrong, PW .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (23) :2133-2141