Osteopathic Medicine in Four Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Diseases: An Observational Trial with Follow-Up

被引:3
作者
Rotter, Gabriele [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ,5 ]
Binting, Sylvia [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Tissen-Diabate, Tatjana [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Ortiz, Miriam [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Brinkhaus, Benno [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Charite Univ Med Berlin, Inst Social Med Epidemiol & Hlth Econ, Berlin, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Berlin, Germany
[3] Humboldt Univ, Berlin, Germany
[4] Berlin Inst Hlth, Berlin, Germany
[5] Hanns Eisler Sch Mus Berlin, Kurt Singer Inst Mus Physiol & Musicians Hlth, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Chronic neck pain; Chronic low back pain; Chronic shoulder pain; Chronic knee pain; Osteopathic medicine; LOW-BACK-PAIN; CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; NONSPECIFIC NECK PAIN; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MANIPULATIVE TREATMENT; SYSTEMATIC ANALYSIS; DISABILITY INDEX; GLOBAL BURDEN; KNEE; SHOULDER;
D O I
10.1159/000518311
中图分类号
R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
10 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: Patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain diseases (CMPDs) often use osteopathic medicine (OM), although the changes in patients with pain diseases are still insufficiently investigated. This study aimed to observe changes along and after OM in addition to routine care on pain, functioning, and quality of life in patients with four CMPDs. Methods: In this observational trial with follow-up, patients suffering from chronic neck pain (CNP, n = 10), chronic low back pain (CLBP, n = 10), chronic shoulder pain (CSP, n = 10), or chronic knee pain (CKP, n = 10) received up to six OM sessions in addition to routine care. Results: A total of 40 patients (73% female, mean age 47.7 +/- 8.3 years, mean pain intensity 59.4 +/- 12.5 mm, measured by a visual analog scale [VAS] 0-100 mm) were included. After 26 weeks, there was an improvement in the VAS pain score in the whole population (mean difference to baseline -33.1 mm [95% CI -40.5 to -25.7]), as well in the patients with the four diseases: CNP (-33.7 mm [-54.7 to -12.6]), CLBP (-28.2 mm [-47.9 to -8.4]), CSP (-32.4 [-46.8 to -18.0]), and CKP (-38.1 mm [-49.1 to -27.0]). Regarding disease-specific outcomes, we found improvements in CNP, as measured by the neck disability index (scale 0-50; mean difference -3.6 [-9.0 to 1.9]), CLBP, as measured by the low back pain rating scale (scale 0-60; -3.4 [-12.5 to 5.7]), CSP, as measured by the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand score (scale 0-100; -13.4 [-23.1 to -3.7]), and CKP, as measured by the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (scale 0-96; -13.0 [-23.5 to -2.5]). These improvements persisted through week 52. No adverse events were observed. Conclusion: The study observed beneficial changes along and after the OM treatment in addition to routine care in patients with four different CMPDs. High-quality, multicenter randomized controlled trials are strongly needed to compare the effectiveness of OM and standard care interventions in treating CMPDs in the future. We have provided sufficient data for sample size calculations for these trials.
引用
收藏
页码:53 / 66
页数:14
相关论文
共 72 条
  • [1] BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
  • [2] MANIPULATIVE THERAPY FOR LOWER EXTREMITY CONDITIONS: EXPANSION OF LITERATURE REVIEW
    Brantingham, James W.
    Globe, Gary
    Pollard, Henry
    Hicks, Marian
    Korporaal, Charmaine
    Hoskins, Wayne
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MANIPULATIVE AND PHYSIOLOGICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2009, 32 (01) : 53 - 71
  • [3] Brunner U., 2017, S2E LEITLINIE ROTATO
  • [4] Bube J., 2009, THESIS GERMAN ACAD O
  • [5] Bullinger M., 1998, SF-36 Fragebogen zum Gesundheitszustand - HandanweisungAufl
  • [6] Bullinger M., 1995, Zeitschrift fr Gesundheitswissenschaften Journal of Public Health, V1, P21, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF02959944, 10.1007/BF02959944]
  • [7] Bundesarztekammer (BAK) . Kassenarztliche Bundesvereinigung (KBV) (AWMF) AdWMF., 2017, NAT VERS NICHT SPEZ
  • [8] The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: A systematic review
    Cerritelli, Francesco
    Verzella, Marco
    Cicchitti, Luca
    D'Alessandro, Giandomenico
    Vanacore, Nicola
    [J]. MEDICINE, 2016, 95 (35)
  • [9] What is the Minimum Clinically Important Difference for the WOMAC Index After TKA?
    Clement, Nicholas D.
    Bardgett, Michelle
    Weir, David
    Holland, James
    Gerrand, Craig
    Deehan, David J.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2018, 476 (10) : 2005 - 2014
  • [10] Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and Pain Scales
    Copay, Anne G.
    Glassman, Steven D.
    Subach, Brian R.
    Berven, Sigurd
    Schuler, Thomas C.
    Carreon, Leah Y.
    [J]. SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 8 (06) : 968 - 974