Strengthening EU policies in support of ICT for development: Results from a survey of ICT experts

被引:3
作者
Quaglio, GianLuca [1 ]
Karapiperis, Theodoros [1 ]
Putoto, Giovanni [2 ]
Delponte, Laura [3 ]
Micheletti, Giorgio [4 ]
Brand, Helmut [5 ]
Bertinato, Luigi [6 ]
Tomson, Goran [7 ,8 ]
Bonnardot, Laurent [9 ]
Zanaboni, Paolo [10 ]
机构
[1] European Parliament, EPRS, Directorate Gen Parliamentary Res Serv, STOA,Sci Foresight Unit, Rue Wiertz 60, B-1047 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Doctors Africa CUAMM, Operat Res Unit, Padua, Italy
[3] Ctr Ind Studies CSIL, Milan, Italy
[4] Int Data Corp IDC, Milan, Italy
[5] Maastricht Univ, CAPHRI, Dept Int Hlth, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[6] Local Hlth Author 20, Verona, Veneto Region, Italy
[7] Karolinska Inst, Dept Learning Informat Management Eth, Solna, Sweden
[8] Karolinska Inst, Dept Publ Hlth Sci, Solna, Sweden
[9] Paris Descartes Univ, EA 4569, Dept Med Eth & Legal Med, Paris, France
[10] Univ Hosp North Norway, Norwegian Ctr E Hlth Res, Tromso, Norway
关键词
Communications technologies; European union; Developing world; Development; COUNTRIES;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlpt.2016.09.001
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is scarce and fragmented evidence of the European Union's policies and strategies being employed in the area of ICT in support of development in LMICs. Methods: An online survey was conducted to collect feedback from experts evaluating past EU initiatives in ICT for development, and the type of approach EU institutions should pursue in ICT for LMICs in the future. Structured interviews were also carried out with ten of the respondents. Results: One hundred and twenty-one experts responded to the survey. About 30% of the respondents believe that the EU institutions' support to ICT for development has improved in the last decade. However, a similar percentage indicated that the EU's support has not improved or has even worsened. The evaluation of the EU's cooperation with international organisations was considered good or sufficient by nearly 31% of respondents. Regarding priorities to be pursued by EU policies towards the use of ICT for development, the EU should focus on reducing health inequalities and the digital divide. Concerning the approaches to promote ICT within EU development cooperation, the EU should carry out a mix of top-down and bottom-up approaches. Almost 70% believe that it is better to support an approach that integrates ICT into different areas of action, rather than having ICT as a specific priority area. Health and education were indicated as priority sectors where the EU should increase the use of ICT. Conclusions: The results of this survey can support decision-makers and ICT managers to better plan and implement ICT deployment in LMICs, making a better use of European human and financial resources in this field. (C) 2016 Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:330 / 340
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] African Development Bank, 2012, REV BANKS ICT OP STR
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2006, Off. J. Eur. Union
  • [3] Critical success factors for e-learning in developing countries: A comparative analysis between ICT experts and faculty
    Bhuasiri, Wannasiri
    Xaymoungkhoun, Oudone
    Zo, Hangjung
    Rho, Jae Jeung
    Ciganek, Andrew P.
    [J]. COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2012, 58 (02) : 843 - 855
  • [4] Bigsten A., 2011, The Aid Effectiveness Agenda: The benefits c l going ahead
  • [5] Burcky Urs., 2011, Trends in In-country Aid Fragmentation and Donor Proliferation: An Analysis of Changes in Aid Allocation Patterns between 2005 and 2009
  • [6] Building Research Capacity in Africa: Equity and Global Health Collaborations
    Chu, Kathryn M.
    Jayaraman, Sudha
    Kyamanywa, Patrick
    Ntakiyiruta, Georges
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2014, 11 (03)
  • [7] The EU and Donor Coordination on the Ground: Perspectives from Tanzania and Zambia
    Delputte, Sarah
    Orbie, Jan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT RESEARCH, 2014, 26 (05) : 676 - 691
  • [8] Denmark's Development Cooperation (Danida), 2012, US ICT PROM GOV
  • [9] European Commission, 2011, COM, V2011, P2011
  • [10] European Commission, 2013, COM201392, P92