A randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk kidney transplant recipients

被引:100
|
作者
Flechner, SM
Avery, RK
Fisher, R
Mastroianni, BA
Papajcik, DA
O'Malley, KJ
Goormastic, M
Goldfarb, DA
Modlin, CS
Novick, AC
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Transplant Ctr A110, Sect Renal Transplantat, Dept Urol, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Div Med, Infect Dis Sect, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00007890-199812270-00019
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background. Posttransplantation cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a significant cause of morbidity in kidney transplant recipients. We performed a randomized prospective controlled trial of oral acyclovir versus oral ganciclovir for CMV prophylaxis in a group of renal allograft recipients considered at high risk for CMV disease due to the use of OKT3 induction therapy. Methods. A total of 101 recipients of cadaveric (83) and zero haplotype-matched live donor (18) kidney transplants were entered into the trial. A total of 22 D-R- patients received no prophylaxis. Twenty-seven D+R-, 29 D+R+, and 23 D-R+ patients were randomized to receive 3 months of either oral acyclovir (800 mg q.i.d.) or oral ganciclovir (1000 mg t.i.d.). Doses were adjusted according to the level of renal function, The D+R- patients were also given CMV immune globulin biweekly for 16 weeks. Surveillance blood cultures were obtained at transplantation, at months 1, 2, 3, and 6, and when clinically indicated. The primary study end points were time to CMV infection and disease the first 6 months after transplantation. Results. The mean follow up was 14.4 months. Both agents were well tolerated, and no drug interruptions for toxicity occurred, CMV was isolated in 14 of 39 (35.9%) acyclovir-treated and 1 of 40 (2.5%) ganciclovir-treated recipients by 6 months (P=0.0001). Symptomatic CMV disease occurred in 9 of 14 (64%) of the acyclovir patients,two with tissue-invasive disease. Infection rates for acyclovir vs. ganciclovir, respectively, stratified by CMV serology were: D+R-, 54 vs. 0%, P=0.0008; D+R+, 43 vs. 6.6%, P=0.01; D-R+, 8.3 vs. 0%, P=NS. No patient developed CMV infection while taking oral ganciclovir, however three delayed infections occurred 2-7 months after finishing therapy. Each patient had been previously treated for acute rejection. Conclusions. Oral acyclovir provides effective CMV prophylaxis only for recipients of seronegative donor kidneys. Oral ganciclovir is a superior agent providing effective CMV prophylaxis for recipients of seropositive donor kidneys. Recipients who are treated for acute rejection are at risk for delayed CMV infection during the first posttransplantation year.
引用
收藏
页码:1682 / 1688
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Failure of ganciclovir prophylaxis of primary cytomegalovirus disease in immunologic high-risk recipients
    Conti, DJ
    Isenberg, A
    Shen, GK
    Hahn, A
    Singh, TP
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1998, 30 (04) : 1314 - 1315
  • [42] Prophylaxis versus preemptive therapy for cytomegalovirus disease in high-risk liver transplant recipients
    Bodro, Marta
    Sabe, Nuria
    Llado, Laura
    Baliellas, Carme
    Niubo, Jordi
    Castellote, Jose
    Fabregat, Joan
    Rafecas, Antoni
    Carratala, Jordi
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2012, 18 (09) : 1093 - 1099
  • [43] Letermovir for cytomegalovirus prophylaxis in high-risk heart transplant recipients
    Golob, Stephanie
    Batra, Jaya
    DeFilippis, Ersilia M.
    Uriel, Matan
    Carey, Matt
    Gaine, Maureen
    Mabasa, Angelo
    Fried, Justin
    Raikelkar, Jayant
    Restaino, Susan
    Lee, Sun Hi
    Latif, Farhana
    Yuzefpolskaya, Melana
    Colombo, Paolo C.
    Choe, Jason
    Majure, David
    Jennings, Douglas
    Pereira, Marcus R.
    Clerkin, Kevin
    Sayer, Gabriel
    Uriel, Nir
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2022, 36 (12)
  • [44] PROPHYLAXIS WITH GANCICLOVIR OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION IN KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    RONDEAU, E
    BOURGEON, B
    PERALDI, MN
    LANG, P
    BUISSON, C
    SCHULTE, KM
    WEILL, B
    SRAER, JD
    PRESSE MEDICALE, 1992, 21 (41): : 1979 - 1980
  • [45] PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS DISEASE IN HEART-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS BY PROPHYLAXIS WITH CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HYPERIMMUNE GLOBULIN PLUS ORAL ACYCLOVIR
    EISENMANN, D
    KNIPP, H
    LAUBE, H
    STEGMANN, T
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1990, 22 (05) : 2322 - 2323
  • [46] A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL EVALUATING GANCICLOVIR FOLLOWED BY HIGH-DOSE ACYCLOVIR VERSUS HIGH-DOSE ACYCLOVIR IN THE PROPHYLAXIS OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS-INFECTION IN LIVER-TRANSPLANTATION
    PORTELA, D
    PATEL, R
    KEATING, MR
    STEERS, JL
    PORAYKO, MK
    WIESNER, RH
    WILHELM, MP
    MARSHALL, WF
    WALKER, RC
    ILSTRUP, DM
    KROM, RAF
    PAYA, CV
    HEPATOLOGY, 1993, 18 (03) : 733 - 733
  • [47] Prophylaxis of cytomegalovirus infection in liver transplantation - A randomized trial comparing a combination of ganciclovir and acyclovir to acyclovir
    Badley, AD
    Seaberg, EC
    Porayko, MK
    Wiesner, RH
    Keating, MR
    Wilhelm, MP
    Walker, RC
    Patel, R
    Marshall, WF
    DeBernardi, M
    Zetterman, R
    Steers, JL
    Paya, CV
    TRANSPLANTATION, 1997, 64 (01) : 66 - 73
  • [48] EFFECTIVENESS OF COMBINATION PROPHYLAXIS WITH CYTOMEGALOVIRUS HYPERIMMUNE GLOBULIN AND ACYCLOVIR IN THE HIGH-RISK KIDNEY-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENT
    UBER, L
    COFER, J
    BALIGA, P
    RAJAGOPALAN, PR
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1995, 27 (05) : 42 - 43
  • [49] EFFECTIVENESS OF ORAL ACYCLOVIR PROPHYLAXIS IN RENAL-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    STOFFEL, M
    SQUIFFLET, JP
    PIRSON, Y
    LAMY, M
    ALEXANDRE, GPJ
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 1987, 19 (01) : 2190 - 2193
  • [50] VALGANCICLOVIR PROPHYLAXIS VERSUS PREEMPTIVE THERAPY FOR PREVENTION OF CYTOMEGALOVIRUS IN RENAL TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS: A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
    Reischig, Tomas
    Kacer, Martin
    Vlas, Tomas
    Machova, Jana
    Kielberger, Lukas
    Richtrova, Pavlina
    Jindra, Pavel
    Lysak, Daniel
    Hes, Ondrej
    Pivovarcikova, Kristyna
    Bouda, Mirko
    Nemcova, Jana
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 34 : 190 - 190