Class II division 1 malocclusion treatment with extraction of maxillary first permanent molars: cephalometric evaluation of treatment and post-treatment changes

被引:0
|
作者
Booij, Johan Willem
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Bronkhorst, Ewald M. [4 ]
Rangel, Frits A. [5 ]
Livas, Christos [6 ]
Ren, Yijin [7 ]
Katsaros, Christos [2 ]
Ongkosuwito, Edwin M. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Orthodont, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Univ Bern, Med Fac, Sch Dent Med, Dept Orthodont & Dentofacial Orthoped, Bern, Switzerland
[3] Univ Indonesia, Fac Dent, Jakarta, Indonesia
[4] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Med Ctr, Dept Dent, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Dent Orthodont & Craniofacial Biol, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Dent Clin Zwolle, Zwolle, Netherlands
[7] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, WJ Kolff Inst Biomed Engn & Mat Sci, Groningen, Netherlands
来源
AUSTRALASIAN ORTHODONTIC JOURNAL | 2021年 / 37卷 / 02期
关键词
SOFT-TISSUE PROFILE; PREMOLAR EXTRACTIONS; ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT; NONEXTRACTION TREATMENT; GINGIVAL RECESSION; GROWTH CHANGES; STABILITY; SKELETAL; THERAPY;
D O I
10.21307/aoj-2021.032
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objective: To investigate the cephalometric outcome and post-treatment changes following the orthodontic treatment involving the extraction of maxillary first molars in patients presenting with a Class II division 1 malocclusion. Methods: A retrospective longitudinal study was conducted involving 83 patients treated by fixed appliances and the extraction of 16 and 26. The mean age at commencement was 13.2 +/- 1.5 years. Lateral cephalograms were available pre-treatment (T1), immediately post-treatment (T2), and at 2.6 years post-treatment (T3). The sample was divided into hypodivergent (n = 18), normodivergent (n = 17), and hyperdivergent (n = 48) facial types. Mean increments, standard deviations, and 95% confidence intervals were calculated for T2-T1 and T3-T2. Increments were tested using paired-samples .tests, and variables between groups by applying ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. Linear regression was used to examine the effect of facial type, age, and gender. Results: Significant changes occurred during treatment for most cephalometric variables. Post-treatment, the growth pattern showed a tendency to return to the original form. Facial type had only a minor influence on cephalometric increments during and after treatment. Conclusions: Post-treatment skeletal, soft tissue, and dentoalveolar changes were limited. Facial type had only a minor influence during and after treatment and care must be taken to control lower incisor inclination.
引用
收藏
页码:294 / 310
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Masseter muscle thickness and treatment outcomes in children with Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Tentolouri, E.
    Antonarakis, G. S.
    Georgiakaki, I
    Kiliaridis, S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC DENTISTRY, 2021, 22 (04) : 298 - 302
  • [22] Long-term evaluation of Class II subdivision treatment with unilateral maxillary first molar extraction
    Livas, Christos
    Pandis, Nikolaos
    Booij, Johan Willem
    Katsaros, Christos
    Ren, Yijin
    ANGLE ORTHODONTIST, 2015, 85 (05) : 757 - 763
  • [23] Long-term (≥15 years) post-treatment changes and outcome quality after Class II: 1 treatment in comparison to untreated Class I controls
    Bock, Niko C.
    Saffar, Mitra
    Hudel, Helge
    Evalahti, Marjut
    Heikinheimo, Kaisa
    Rice, David P.
    Ruf, Sabine
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2018, 40 (02) : 206 - 213
  • [24] Root resorption in Class II malocclusion treatment with and without maxillary premolar extractions
    Aliaga-Del Castillo, Aron
    da Silva, Aline Oliveira
    Maranhao, Olga Benario Vieira
    Barros, Sergio Estelita
    Niederberger, Ana
    Bellini-Pereira, Silvio Augusto
    Garib, Daniela
    Janson, Guilherme
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2023, 163 (03) : 389 - 397
  • [25] Second Versus First Molar Extractions in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treatment: A Retrospective Longitudinal Outcome Study into Maxillary Canine, Premolar, and Molar Movement
    Oostenbrink, Akkelien H. A.
    Bronkhorst, Ewald M.
    Booij, Johan W.
    Dieters, Arjan J. A.
    Ren, Yijin
    Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
    Bruggink, Robin
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2025, 14 (01)
  • [26] A Comparative Analysis of Arch Widths in Class I and Class II Malocclusion: Extraction vs. Non-extraction Treatment
    Hegde, Anusha
    Lohith, D.
    Shailaja, A. M.
    Geevee, Ajith
    Srikant, Rohith M.
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (04)
  • [27] Factors influencing soft tissue profile changes following orthodontic treatment in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion
    Suhatcha Maetevorakul
    Smorntree Viteporn
    Progress in Orthodontics, 17
  • [28] Effectiveness of prefabricated myofunctional appliances in the treatment of Class II division 1 malocclusion: a systematic review
    Mohammed, Hisham
    Cirgic, Emina
    Rizk, Mumen Z.
    Vandevska-Radunovic, Vaska
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2020, 42 (02) : 125 - 134
  • [29] Post-treatment evaluation of a magnetic activator device in Class II high-angle malocclusions
    Yuksel, Sema
    Kaygisiz, Emine
    Ulusoy, Cagri
    Keykubat, Alaattin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2010, 32 (04) : 425 - 429
  • [30] Treatment effects of the R-appliance and twin block in Class II division 1 malocclusion
    Jamilian, Abdolreza
    Showkatbakhsh, Rahman
    Amiri, Shabnam Sheikholeslam
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS, 2011, 33 (04) : 354 - 358