Comparison of the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system versus cannulated screws in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults

被引:47
|
作者
He, Changjun [1 ,2 ]
Lu, Yao [1 ]
Wang, Qian [1 ]
Ren, Cheng [1 ]
Li, Ming [1 ]
Yang, Mingyi [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Yibo [1 ]
Li, Zhong [1 ]
Zhang, Kun [1 ]
Ma, Teng [1 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, HongHui Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 555Youyi East Rd, Xian 710054, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
[2] Yanan Univ, Yanan 710000, Shaanxi, Peoples R China
关键词
Femoral neck fracture; Femoral neck system; Cannulated screw; Internal fixation; INTERNAL-FIXATION; HIP-FRACTURES; COMPLICATIONS; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-021-04888-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background To compare the clinical efficacy of a femoral neck system (FNS) and cannulated screws (CS) in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in young adults. Methods Data from 69 young adults, who were admitted for femoral neck fracture between March 2018 and June 2020, were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to surgical method: FNS and CS. The number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, operative duration, length of hospital stay, fracture healing time, Harris score of hip function, excellent and good rate of hip function, and postoperative complications (infection, cut out the internal fixation, nail withdrawal, and femoral neck shortening) were compared between the two groups. Hip joint function was evaluated using the Harris Hip Scoring system. Results All 69 patients had satisfactory reduction and were followed up for 12-24 months, with a mean follow-up of 16.91 +/- 3.01 months. Mean time to fracture healing was13.82 +/- 1.59 and 14.03 +/- 1.78 weeks in the FNS and CS groups, respectively. There was a statistical difference in the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies between the 2 groups (P = 0.000). There were no significant differences, in operation duration, hospital length of stay, fracture healing time, complications, Harris Hip Score for hip function and excellent and good rate between the two groups (P > 0.05). The incidence of complications was 6.1%(2/33) in the FNS group lower than 25%(9/36) in the CS group, a difference that was statistically significant (P = 0.032). At the last follow-up, the Harris Hip Score of the hip joint in the FNS group was 90.42 +/- 4.82and 88.44 +/- 5.91 in the CS group. Conclusions Both treatment methods resulted in higher rates of fracture healing and excellent hip function. Compared with CS, the FNS reduced the number of intraoperative fluoroscopies, radiation exposure to medical staff and patients, and short-term complications including femoral neck shortening and bone nonunion.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
    Wang, Yilin
    Han, Na
    Zhang, Dianying
    Zhang, Peixun
    Jiang, Baoguo
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [42] Biomechanical comparison of femoral neck system and cannulated screws coupled with medial plate for treating Pauwels III femoral neck fractures
    Nan, Chong
    Li, Yanjun
    Liu, Yuxiu
    Ma, Liang
    Ma, Zhanbei
    TECHNOLOGY AND HEALTH CARE, 2023, 31 (04) : 1161 - 1170
  • [43] Comparison between headless cannulated screws and partially threaded screws in femoral neck fracture treatment: a retrospective cohort study
    Yilin Wang
    Na Han
    Dianying Zhang
    Peixun Zhang
    Baoguo Jiang
    Scientific Reports, 12
  • [44] Does the femoral neck system provide better outcomes compared to cannulated screws fixation for the management of femoral neck fracture in young adults? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis
    Rajnish, Rajesh Kumar
    Srivastava, Amit
    Rathod, Pratik M.
    Haq, Rehan Ul
    Aggarwal, Sameer
    Kumar, Prasoon
    Dhammi, Ish Kumar
    Dadra, Ankit
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDICS, 2022, 32 : 52 - 59
  • [45] Is Femoral Neck System a Valid Alternative for the Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures in Adolescents? A Comparative Study of Femoral Neck System versus Cannulated Compression Screw
    Lu, Yunan
    Canavese, Federico
    Nan, Guoxin
    Lin, Ran
    Huang, Yuling
    Pan, Nuoqi
    Chen, Shunyou
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2022, 58 (08):
  • [46] Biomechanical Evaluation of the Femoral Neck System in Unstable Pauwels III Femoral Neck Fractures: A Comparison with the Dynamic Hip Screw and Cannulated Screws
    Stoffel, Karl
    Zderic, Ivan
    Gras, Florian
    Sommer, Christoph
    Eberli, Ursula
    Mueller, David
    Oswald, Martin
    Gueorguiev, Boyko
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2017, 31 (03) : 131 - 137
  • [47] Comparison of young femoral neck fractures treated by femoral neck system, multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws: a retrospectively comparison study
    Leyi Cai
    Wenhao Zheng
    Chunhui Chen
    Wei Hu
    Hua Chen
    Te Wang
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 25
  • [48] Comparison of young femoral neck fractures treated by femoral neck system, multiple cancellous screws and dynamic hip screws: a retrospectively comparison study
    Cai, Leyi
    Zheng, Wenhao
    Chen, Chunhui
    Hu, Wei
    Chen, Hua
    Wang, Te
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)
  • [49] Comparison Between Femoral Neck Systems and Cannulated Cancellous Screws in Treating Femoral Neck Fractures: A Meta-Analysis
    Tian, Peng
    Kuang, Lan
    Li, Zhi-jun
    Xu, Gui-jun
    Fu, Xin
    GERIATRIC ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY & REHABILITATION, 2022, 13
  • [50] Comparison of the clinical efficacy of three cannulated screws with parallel distribution and inverted triangular distribution in the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly
    Liu, Jiuxiang
    Zuo, Qiang
    Zhou, Hao
    Huang, Xiaowen
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE, 2023, 26 (04)