Partner violence screening in rural health care clinics

被引:32
作者
Coker, Ann L.
Flerx, Vicki C. [1 ]
Smith, Paige H. [2 ]
Whitaker, Daniel J. [3 ]
Fadden, Mary Kay [4 ]
Williams, Melinda [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Carolina, Inst Families & Soc, Columbia, SC 29208 USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Ctr Womens Hlth & Wellness, Greensboro, NC 27412 USA
[3] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Natl Ctr Injury Prevent & Control, Div Violence Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[4] Univ Texas Houston, Sch Publ Hlth, Brownsville, TX USA
关键词
D O I
10.2105/AJPH.2005.085357
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Objectives. We sought to determine the frequency of intimate partner violence by type in a large, clinic-based, nurse-administered screening and services intervention project. Methods. A brief intimate partner violence screen, which included items to measure sexual and physical assaults and psychological battering (using the Women's Experience With Battering scale) was administered to consenting women receiving care at 1 of 8 rural clinics in South Carolina. Results. Between April 2002 and August 2005, 4945 eligible women were offered intimate partner violence screening, to which 3664 (74.1%) consented. Prevalence of intimate partner violence in a current (ongoing) relationship was 13.3%, and 939 women (25.6%) had experienced intimate partner violence at some point in the past 5 years. Of those ever experiencing intimate partner violence, the majority (65.6%) experienced both assaults and psychological battering; 10.1% experienced assault only, and 24.3% experienced psychological battering only. Most women (85.5%) currently experiencing both psychological battering and assaults stated that violence was a problem in their current relationship. Conclusions. The intimate partner violence screening technique we used was feasible to implement, acceptable to women seeking health care at the targeted clinics, and indicated a high proportion of women reporting intimate partner violence in the past 5 years, with a majority of those women stating that such violence was a problem in their relationships. These findings demonstrated the viability of the screening technique, which supports the growing importance of implementing intimate partner violence screenings in clinical settings in order to reduce the prevalence of violence in intimate relationships.
引用
收藏
页码:1319 / 1325
页数:7
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
*AM MED ASS, 1992, ARCH FAM MED, V1, P39, DOI DOI 10.1001/ARCHFAMI.1.1.39
[2]  
[Anonymous], NCJ PUBLICATION
[3]   Conversational silence, coercion, equality: The role of language in influencing who gets identified as abused [J].
Bonomi, AE ;
Allen, DG ;
Holt, VL .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2006, 62 (09) :2258-2266
[4]  
Brown JB, 2000, J FAM PRACTICE, V49, P896
[5]  
Bullock L F, 1989, J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv, V27, P11
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), 2000, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, V49, P691
[7]  
COKER A, IN PRESS PREVENTING
[8]  
Coker A L, 2001, J Am Med Womens Assoc (1972), V56, P19
[9]   Physical health consequences of physical and psychological intimate partner violence [J].
Coker, AL ;
Smith, PH ;
Bethea, L ;
King, MR ;
McKeown, RE .
ARCHIVES OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2000, 9 (05) :451-457
[10]   Frequency and correlates of intimate partner violence by type: Physical, sexual, and psychological battering [J].
Coker, AL ;
Smith, PH ;
McKeown, RE ;
King, MJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2000, 90 (04) :553-559