Comparison of the Framingham risk and SCORE models in predicting the presence and severity of coronary artery disease considering SYNTAX score

被引:17
作者
Gunaydin, Zeki Yuksel [1 ]
Karagoz, Ahmet [2 ]
Bektas, Osman [1 ]
Kaya, Ahmet [1 ]
Kiris, Tuncay [3 ]
Erdogan, Guney [3 ]
Isik, Turgay [4 ]
Ayhan, Erkan [4 ]
机构
[1] Ordu Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Ordu, Turkey
[2] Giresun Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Giresun, Turkey
[3] Ordu State Hosp, Cardiol, Ordu, Turkey
[4] Balikesir Univ, Fac Med, Dept Cardiol, Balikesir, Turkey
关键词
SYNTAX score; Framingham risk score; SCORE; CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE; HEART-DISEASE; CLINICAL-PRACTICE; POPULATION; INTERVENTION; MEN; ACCURACY; SOCIETY; PROJECT; COHORT;
D O I
10.5152/AnatolJCardiol.2015.6317
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective: Although various risk stratification models are available and currently being used, the performance of these models in different populations is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the relation between the Framingham and SCORE models and the presence and severity of coronary artery disease, which is detected using the SYNTAX score. Methods: The observational cross-sectional study population consisted of 227 patients with a mean age of 63.3 +/- 9.2 years. The patients were classified into low-and high-risk groups in the Framingham and SCORE models separately. Following coronary angiography, the patients were classified into SYNTAX=0 (SYNTAX score 0), low SYNTAX (SYNTAX score 1-22), and high SYNTAX (SYNTAX score>22) groups. The relation between the risk models and SYNTAX score was evaluated by student t test, Mann-Whitney U test or Kruskal-Wallis test and Receiver operating characteristic analysis were used to detect the discrimination ability in the prediction of SYNTAX score>0 and a high SYNTAX score. Results: Both the Framingham and SCORE models were found to be effective in predicting the presence of coronary artery disease, and neither of the two models had superiority over each other [AUC=0.819 (0.767, 0.871) vs. 0.811 (0.757, 0.861), p=0.881]. Furthermore, both models were also effective in predicting the extent and severity of coronary artery disease [AUC=0.724 (0.656, 0.798) vs. 0.730 (0.662, 0.802), p=0.224]. When the subgroups were analyzed, the SCORE model was found to be better in predicting coronary artery disease extent and severity in subgroups of men and diabetics {[AUC=0.737 (0.668, 0.844) vs. 0.665 (0.560, 0.790), p=0.019], [AUC=0.733 (0.684, 0.798) vs. 0.680 (0.654, 0.750) p=0.029], respectively). Conclusion: In addition to their role in predicting cardiovascular events, the use of the Framingham and SCORE models may also have utility in predicting the extent and severity of coronary artery disease. The SCORE risk model has a slightly better performance than the Framingham risk model.
引用
收藏
页码:412 / 418
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Atherogenic Index of Plasma Is an Independent Risk Factor for Coronary Artery Disease and a Higher SYNTAX Score
    Wang, Luzhao
    Chen, Fangyao
    Xiaoqi, Chai
    Yujun, Chen
    Zijie, Li
    ANGIOLOGY, 2021, 72 (02) : 181 - 186
  • [32] A New Tool for the Risk Stratification of Patients With Complex Coronary Artery Disease The Clinical SYNTAX Score
    Garg, Scot
    Sarno, Giovanna
    Garcia-Garcia, Hector M.
    Girasis, Chrysafios
    Wykrzykowska, Joanna
    Dawkins, Keith D.
    Serruys, Patrick W.
    CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR INTERVENTIONS, 2010, 3 (04) : 317 - U94
  • [33] SYNTAX Score is Associated with Circulating Endothelial Progenitor Cells in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease
    Chiang, Chia-Hung
    Leu, Hsin-Bang
    Huang, Po-Hsun
    Chung, Fa-Po
    Huang, Chin-Chou
    Wu, Tao-Cheng
    Chen, Jaw-Wen
    Lin, Shing-Jong
    ACTA CARDIOLOGICA SINICA, 2012, 28 (03) : 216 - 224
  • [34] Applying the Framingham risk score for prediction of metabolic syndrome: The Kerman Coronary Artery Disease Risk Study, Iran
    Yousefzadeh, Gholamreza
    Shokoohi, Mostafa
    Najafipour, Hamid
    Shadkamfarokhi, Mitra
    ARYA ATHEROSCLEROSIS, 2015, 11 (03) : 179 - 185
  • [35] Framingham Risk Score for the prediction of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic rheumatic heart disease
    Lin, Yaowang
    Wei, Xuebiao
    Cai, Anping
    Yang, Xing
    Zhou, Yingling
    Yu, Danqing
    DIAGNOSIS, 2014, 1 (03) : 233 - 238
  • [36] Changing of SYNTAX score performing fractional flow reserve in multivessel coronary artery disease
    Novara, Marco
    D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
    Gonella, Anna
    Bollati, Mario
    Biondi-Zoccai, Giuseppe
    Moretti, Claudio
    Omede, Pierluigi
    Sciuto, Filippo
    Sheiban, Imad
    Gaita, Fiorenzo
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE, 2012, 13 (06) : 368 - 375
  • [37] ASSOCIATION OF ANTICARDIOLIPIN ANTIBODIES, COMPLEMENT AND LEPTIN WITH THE SEVERITY OF CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE EXPRESSED AS SYNTAX SCORE
    Runjic, F.
    Martinovic-Kaliterna, D.
    Salamunic, I
    Kristic, I
    Ljubkovic, M.
    Marinovic, J.
    JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2020, 71 (03): : 383 - 388
  • [38] Impact of Coronary Artery Disease Severity Assessed With the SYNTAX Score on Outcomes Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
    Paradis, Jean-Michel
    White, Jonathon M.
    Genereux, Philippe
    Urena, Marina
    Doshi, Darshan
    Nazif, Tamim
    Hahn, Rebecca
    George, Isaac
    Khalique, Omar
    Harjai, Kishore
    Lasalle, Laura
    Labbe, Benoit M.
    DeLarochelliere, Robert
    Doyle, Daniel
    Dumont, Eric
    Mohammadi, Siamak
    Leon, Martin B.
    Rodes-Cabau, Josep
    Kodali, Susheel
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION, 2017, 6 (02):
  • [39] SYNTAX score-0 patients: risk stratification in nonobstructive coronary artery disease
    Christoph Sinning
    Elvin Zengin
    Christoph Waldeyer
    Moritz Seiffert
    Renate B. Schnabel
    Edith Lubos
    Tanja Zeller
    Christoph Bickel
    Stefan Blankenberg
    Peter M. Clemmensen
    Dirk Westermann
    Clinical Research in Cardiology, 2016, 105 : 901 - 911
  • [40] Creating a genetic risk score for coronary artery disease
    Dandona, Sonny
    Roberts, Robert
    CURRENT ATHEROSCLEROSIS REPORTS, 2009, 11 (03) : 175 - 181