Research on the Characteristics of Innovation in Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: A Comparative Analysis of Large Enterprises

被引:0
作者
Chen, Shouyu [1 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Yuexiu Univ Foreign Languages, Shaoxing, Peoples R China
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SOCIAL NETWORK, COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION (SNCE 2017) | 2017年 / 82卷
关键词
Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs); The characteristics of innovation; Comparative analysis; Behavior advantage; Resource inferiority; BARRIERS;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The number of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is huge, and the innovation of SMEs is of great significance to economic development. The innovation of SMEs is different from large enterprises, and has its own characteristics. The most important advantage of small and medium-sized enterprise innovation is behavior advantage, the biggest disadvantage lies in resource inferiority. It is of practical significance in guiding SMEs' innovative activities to fully understand the characteristics of SMEs' innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:264 / 268
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[11]   THE EFFECT OF A MARKET ORIENTATION ON BUSINESS PROFITABILITY [J].
NARVER, JC ;
SLATER, SF .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING, 1990, 54 (04) :20-35
[12]  
Oakey R., 1988, MANAGEMENT INNOVATIO
[13]   Is innovation always beneficial? A meta-analysis of the relationship between innovation and performance in SMEs [J].
Rosenbusch, Nina ;
Brinckmann, Jan ;
Bausch, Andreas .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2011, 26 (04) :441-457
[14]  
Rothwell R., 1994, The Handbook of industrial, P33
[15]  
Schumaker E., 1973, SMALL IS BEAUTIFUL, P25
[16]   Uncovering barriers to complex incremental product innovation in small and medium-sized financial services firms [J].
Vermeulen, PAM .
JOURNAL OF SMALL BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2005, 43 (04) :432-452
[17]  
Vossen R., 1998, International Small Business Journal, V16, P88, DOI DOI 10.1177/0266242698163005
[18]   SCHUMPETERIAN COMPETITION IN ALTERNATIVE TECHNOLOGICAL REGIMES [J].
WINTER, SG .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1984, 5 (3-4) :287-320