Awakening, clinical recovery, and psychomotor effects after desflurane and propofol anesthesia

被引:34
作者
Apfelbaum, JL
Lichtor, JL
Lane, BS
Coalson, DW
Korttila, KT
机构
[1] Department of Anesthesia, Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
[2] Department of Anesthesia, University of Chicago, MC 4028, Chicago, IL 60637
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199610000-00010
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We compared postanesthetic and residual recovery of desflurane versus propofol anesthesia. Twenty volunteers were anesthetized for 1 h at 1-wk intervals with either propofol (induction) plus desflurane (1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) in O-2 (PD), propofol plus desflurane in N2O-O-2 (PDN), propofol plus propofol infusion with N2O-O-2 (PPN), or desflurane (induction) plus desflurane in O-2 (DD). Awakening and clinical recovery were measured. Psychomotor skills (attention, coordination, reactive skills, and memory) were tested before and 1, 3, 5, and 7 h after anesthesia. Awakening was fastest in Group PDN. Atl h after anesthesia, the subjects given desflurane for maintenance (PD, PDN, and DD) performed significantly (P < 0.05-0.01) better in several psychomotor tests compared with those whose anesthesia was maintained with propofol (PPN). However, subjects met criteria for home readiness as fast after PPN as after PDN anesthesia (mean times +/- SE until fitness for discharge were 126 +/- 20, 81 +/- 14, 70 +/- 7, and 106 +/- 14 min after PD, PDN, PPN, and DD, respectively). Awakening and early psychomotor recovery for as long as 1 h after anesthesia is faster after desflurane than after propofol, but there was no difference in time to home readiness or in residual effects thereafter between propofol and desflurane with N2O in O-2.
引用
收藏
页码:721 / 725
页数:5
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Recovery profile after desflurane with or without ondansetron compared with propofol in patients undergoing outpatient gynecological laparoscopy [J].
Eriksson, H ;
Korttila, K .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :533-538
[2]   NAUSEA - THE MOST IMPORTANT FACTOR DETERMINING LENGTH OF STAY AFTER AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF ISOFLURANE AND OR PROPOFOL TECHNIQUES [J].
GREEN, G ;
JONSSON, L .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (08) :742-746
[3]   MEASUREMENT OF RECOVERY FROM OUTPATIENT GENERAL ANAESTHESIA WITH A SIMPLE OCULAR TEST [J].
HANNINGTONKIFF, JG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1970, 3 (5715) :132-+
[4]   PSYCHOMOTOR FUNCTION AND PSYCHOACTIVE-DRUGS [J].
HINDMARCH, I .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 1980, 10 (03) :189-209
[5]   RECOVERY FROM PROPOFOL - DOES IT REALLY MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
KORTTILA, K .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ANESTHESIA, 1993, 5 (06) :443-446
[6]   RECOVERY FROM OUTPATIENT ANESTHESIA - FACTORS AFFECTING OUTCOME [J].
KORTTILA, K .
ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 50 :22-28
[7]   EFFECT OF PAIN ON HUMAN PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
SEPPALA, T .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1978, 22 (03) :334-338
[8]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF RECOVERY AFTER PROPOFOL-NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTONE-ISOFLURANE-NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
OSTMAN, P ;
FAURE, E ;
APFELBAUM, JL ;
PRUNSKIS, J ;
EKDAWI, M ;
ROIZEN, MF .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 (05) :400-403
[9]   CLINICAL RECOVERY AND PSYCHOMOTOR FUNCTION AFTER BRIEF ANESTHESIA WITH PROPOFOL OR THIOPENTAL [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
NUOTTO, EJ ;
LICHTOR, JL ;
OSTMAN, PL ;
APFELBAUM, J ;
RUPANI, G .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 76 (05) :676-681
[10]  
KORTTILA K, 1981, ANAESTHESIST, V30, P377