A study on the selection of benchmarking paths in DEA

被引:49
作者
Lim, Sungmook [2 ]
Bae, Hyerim [1 ]
Lee, Loo Hay [3 ]
机构
[1] Pusan Natl Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Pusan 609735, South Korea
[2] Korea Univ, Div Business Adm, Chungnam 339700, South Korea
[3] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Singapore 119260, Singapore
关键词
Data Envelopment Analysis; Benchmarking; Non-parametric method; Stratification; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; EFFICIENCY; PRODUCTIVITY; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.eswa.2010.12.148
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
One of the existing DEA methods' limitations noted in the literature lies in the process of benchmarking of reference targets for inefficient DMUs. Difficulties arising in this process can be summarized to three aspects. First, the reference target might be a hypothetical DMU that does not actually exist (it is difficult and indeed unrealistic to learn from such a DMU). Second, the reference set of an inefficient DMU often has multiple efficient DMUs making it difficult to benchmark multiple best-practice DMUs simultaneously. Third, it is quite impossible for an inefficient DMU to achieve its target's efficiency in a single step, especially when the inefficient DMU is far from the efficient frontier. In order to overcome these difficulties, we propose, in place of the selection of benchmarked DMUs on the efficient frontier, a method of selecting effective benchmarking paths that direct an inefficient DMU to its target on the efficient frontier in an implementable and realistic way. The proposed method was designed based on the idea of the context-dependent DEA proposed by Seiford and Zhu (2003). It starts by clustering DMUs into several layers according to their efficiency scores, and then establishes a benchmarking path across the sequence of layers. Among the DMUs in the next layer, the most preferable one is selected as the next benchmark target, based on three criteria: attractiveness, progress, and infeasibility. We tested the proposed method by applying it to the evaluation of the relative efficiency of operations of 26 container terminals located in Asia. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7665 / 7673
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2006, MARIT ECON LOGIST
[2]   THE USE OF CATEGORICAL VARIABLES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
MOREY, RC .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1986, 32 (12) :1613-1627
[3]   SOME MODELS FOR ESTIMATING TECHNICAL AND SCALE INEFFICIENCIES IN DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS [J].
BANKER, RD ;
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1984, 30 (09) :1078-1092
[4]   Determinants of hospital efficiency: the case of central government-owned hospitals in Taiwan [J].
Chang, HH .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1998, 26 (02) :307-317
[5]   FOUNDATIONS OF DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS FOR PARETO-KOOPMANS EFFICIENT EMPIRICAL PRODUCTION-FUNCTIONS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
GOLANY, B ;
SEIFORD, L ;
STUTZ, J .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 1985, 30 (1-2) :91-107
[6]   MEASURING EFFICIENCY OF DECISION-MAKING UNITS [J].
CHARNES, A ;
COOPER, WW ;
RHODES, E .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1978, 2 (06) :429-444
[7]  
Cooper W W., 2005, Introduction to data envelopment analysis and its uses: with DEA-solver software and references
[8]   RAM: A range adjusted measure of inefficiency for use with additive models, and relations to other models and measures in DEA [J].
Cooper, WW ;
Park, KS ;
Pastor, JT .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTIVITY ANALYSIS, 1999, 11 (01) :5-42
[9]  
Cullinane K., 2004, Review of Network Economics, V3, P184, DOI [DOI 10.2202/1446-9022.1050, 10.2202/1446-9022.1050]
[10]  
Diaz-Armas R., 1999, INTERNATIONALJOUR NA, V26, P237