Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation

被引:316
作者
Choi, Jung Kyoon [1 ,2 ]
Yu, Ungsik [2 ]
Kim, Sangsoo [2 ]
Yoo, Ook Joon [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Adv Inst Sci & Technol, Dept Biol Sci, Taejon 305701, South Korea
[2] Korea Res Inst Biosci & Biotechnol, Genome Res Ctr, Taejon 305333, South Korea
关键词
microarray; meta-analysis; effect size; Bayesian meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1010
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We have established a method for systematic integration of multiple microarray datasets. The method was applied to two different sets of cancer profiling studies. The change of gene expression in cancer was expressed as 'effect size', a standardized index measuring the magnitude of a treatment or covariate effect. The effect sizes were combined to obtain the estimate of the overall mean. The statistical significance was determined by a permutation test extended to multiple datasets. It was shown that the data integration promotes the discovery of small but consistent expression changes with increased sensitivity and reliability. The effect size methods provided the efficient modeling framework for addressing interstudy variation as well. Based on the result of homogeneity tests, a fixed effects model was adopted for one set of datasets that had been created in controlled experimental conditions. By contrast, a random effects model was shown to be appropriate for the other set of datasets that had been published by independent groups. We also developed an alternative modeling procedure based on a Bayesian approach, which would offer flexibility and robustness compared to the classical procedure.
引用
收藏
页码:i84 / i90
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING
    BENJAMINI, Y
    HOCHBERG, Y
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) : 289 - 300
  • [2] SOME METHODS FOR STRENGTHENING THE COMMON X2 TESTS
    COCHRAN, WG
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1954, 10 (04) : 417 - 451
  • [3] Cooper H., 1994, HDB RES SYNTHESIS, V1st
  • [4] METAANALYSIS IN CLINICAL-TRIALS
    DERSIMONIAN, R
    LAIRD, N
    [J]. CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1986, 7 (03): : 177 - 188
  • [5] Delineation of prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer
    Dhanasekaran, SM
    Barrette, TR
    Ghosh, D
    Shah, R
    Varambally, S
    Kurachi, K
    Pienta, KJ
    Rubin, MA
    Chinnaiyan, AM
    [J]. NATURE, 2001, 412 (6849) : 822 - 826
  • [6] BAYES METHODS FOR COMBINING THE RESULTS OF CANCER STUDIES IN HUMANS AND OTHER SPECIES
    DUMOUCHEL, WH
    HARRIS, JE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1983, 78 (382) : 293 - 308
  • [7] Hedges LV., 2014, Statistical Methods for Meta -Analysis
  • [8] Luo J, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P4683
  • [9] Magee JA, 2001, CANCER RES, V61, P5692
  • [10] MOOD AM, 1995, INTRO THEORY STAT